A Theory of Enzyme Chemotaxis: From Experiments to Modeling.

Enzymes show two distinct transport behaviors in the presence of their substrates in solution. First, their diffusivity enhances with an increasing substrate concentration. In addition, enzymes perform directional motion toward regions with a high substrate concentration, termed as chemotaxis. While a variety of enzymes has been shown to undergo chemotaxis, there remains a lack of quantitative understanding of the phenomenon. Here, we derive a general expression for the active movement of an enzyme in a concentration gradient of its substrate. The proposed model takes into account both the substrate-binding and catalytic turnover step, as well as the enhanced diffusion of the enzyme. We have experimentally measured the chemotaxis of a fast and a slow enzyme: urease under catalytic conditions and hexokinase for both full catalysis and for simple noncatalytic substrate binding. There is good agreement between the proposed model and the experiments. The model is general, has no adjustable parameters, and only requires three experimentally defined constants to quantify chemotaxis: enzyme-substrate binding affinity ( Kd), Michaelis-Menten constant ( KM), and level of diffusion enhancement in the associated substrate (α).

[1]  L. Pradel,et al.  Yeast hexokinase: interaction with substrates and analogs studied by difference spectrophotometry. , 1974, European journal of biochemistry.

[2]  H. Pelicano,et al.  Glycolysis inhibition for anticancer treatment , 2006, Oncogene.

[3]  P. Braun,et al.  Autonomic molecular transport by polymer films containing programmed chemical potential gradients. , 2015, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[4]  Samudra Sengupta,et al.  Substrate catalysis enhances single-enzyme diffusion. , 2010, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[5]  Ayusman Sen,et al.  Chemotactic separation of enzymes. , 2014, ACS nano.

[6]  P. Wolynes,et al.  On the hydrodynamics of swimming enzymes. , 2015, The Journal of chemical physics.

[7]  Kambiz M. Hamadani,et al.  The heat released during catalytic turnover enhances the diffusion of an enzyme , 2014, Nature.

[8]  Rajarshi Guha,et al.  Chemotaxis of Molecular Dyes in Polymer Gradients in Solution. , 2017, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[9]  M. Ahmadian,et al.  Simulation of red blood cell motion in microvessels using modified moving particle semi-implicit method , 2012 .

[10]  Ramin Golestanian,et al.  Micromotors Powered by Enzyme Catalysis. , 2015, Nano letters.

[11]  E. Webb,et al.  Jack bean urease (EC 3.5.1.5). A new purification and reliable rate assay. , 1969, Biochemistry.

[12]  J. Michael Schurr,et al.  A theory of macromolecular chemotaxis. , 2013, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[13]  G. Battaglia,et al.  Chemotactic synthetic vesicles: Design and applications in blood-brain barrier crossing , 2016, Science Advances.

[14]  A. Zydney,et al.  Use of fluorescently-labeled nanoparticles to study pore morphology and virus capture in virus filtration membranes , 2017 .

[15]  T. Tlusty,et al.  Enzyme leaps fuel antichemotaxis , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[16]  A. Fersht,et al.  Catalysis, binding and enzyme-substrate complementarity , 1974, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[17]  G. Lienhard,et al.  Enzymatic Catalysis and Transition-State Theory , 1973, Science.

[18]  J. L. Anderson,et al.  Transport Mechanisms of Biological Colloids a , 1986, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[19]  M. Gilson,et al.  Substrate-driven chemotactic assembly in an enzyme cascade. , 2018, Nature chemistry.

[20]  Rajarshi Guha,et al.  Modulation of Spatiotemporal Particle Patterning in Evaporating Droplets: Applications to Diagnostics and Materials Science. , 2017, ACS applied materials & interfaces.

[21]  R. Astumian,et al.  DNA polymerase as a molecular motor and pump. , 2014, ACS nano.

[22]  Kayla Gentile,et al.  Powering Motion with Enzymes. , 2018, Accounts of chemical research.

[23]  Samuel Sánchez,et al.  Chemically powered micro- and nanomotors. , 2015, Angewandte Chemie.

[24]  H. Fromm,et al.  Kinetic studies of yeast hexokinase. , 1962, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[25]  Tristan Tabouillot,et al.  Enzyme molecules as nanomotors. , 2013, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[26]  A. Mikhailov,et al.  Hydrodynamic collective effects of active protein machines in solution and lipid bilayers , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[27]  Directed transport by surface chemical potential gradients for enhancing analyte collection in nanoscale sensors. , 2015, Nano letters.

[28]  Ayusman Sen,et al.  Dynamic Coupling at the Ångström Scale. , 2016, Angewandte Chemie.

[29]  R. Golestanian,et al.  Exothermicity Is Not a Necessary Condition for Enhanced Diffusion of Enzymes. , 2017, Nano letters.

[30]  C. Cori,et al.  A comparative study of hexokinase from yeast and animal tissues. , 1950, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[31]  Ayusman Sen,et al.  Chemically Propelled Molecules and Machines. , 2017, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[32]  R. Golestanian,et al.  Phoresis and Enhanced Diffusion Compete in Enzyme Chemotaxis. , 2018, Nano letters.

[33]  S. Sánchez,et al.  Cross-stream migration of active particles , 2017, Science Advances.

[34]  C. O’Hern,et al.  The Bacterial Cytoplasm Has Glass-like Properties and Is Fluidized by Metabolic Activity , 2014, Cell.

[35]  Ming Guo,et al.  Probing the Stochastic, Motor-Driven Properties of the Cytoplasm Using Force Spectrum Microscopy , 2014, Cell.

[36]  J. Mccammon,et al.  Brownian dynamic study of an enzyme metabolon in the TCA cycle: Substrate kinetics and channeling , 2017, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[37]  Ayusman Sen,et al.  Enhanced Diffusion of Passive Tracers in Active Enzyme Solutions. , 2017, Nano letters.

[38]  Juan J de Pablo,et al.  Molecular propulsion: chemical sensing and chemotaxis of DNA driven by RNA polymerase. , 2009, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[39]  Shlomi Reuveni,et al.  Role of substrate unbinding in Michaelis–Menten enzymatic reactions , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[40]  S. Pressé,et al.  Spatiotemporal Organization of Catalysts Driven by Enhanced Diffusion. , 2017, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[41]  Ayusman Sen,et al.  Impulsive Enzymes: A New Force in Mechanobiology , 2015, Cellular and molecular bioengineering.