30 Days Wild: Development and Evaluation of a Large-Scale Nature Engagement Campaign to Improve Well-Being

There is a need to increase people’s engagement with and connection to nature, both for human well-being and the conservation of nature itself. In order to suggest ways for people to engage with nature and create a wider social context to normalise nature engagement, The Wildlife Trusts developed a mass engagement campaign, 30 Days Wild. The campaign asked people to engage with nature every day for a month. 12,400 people signed up for 30 Days Wild via an online sign-up with an estimated 18,500 taking part overall, resulting in an estimated 300,000 engagements with nature by participants. Samples of those taking part were found to have sustained increases in happiness, health, connection to nature and pro-nature behaviours. With the improvement in health being predicted by the improvement in happiness, this relationship was mediated by the change in connection to nature.

[1]  RichardsonMiles,et al.  Reflective Self-Attention: A More Stable Predictor of Connection to Nature Than Mindful Attention , 2015 .

[2]  J. Ernst,et al.  Evaluating the effects of environmental education programming on connectedness to nature , 2011 .

[3]  R. Cowling,et al.  Responses of South African land-use planning stakeholders to the New Ecological Paradigm and the Inclusion of Nature in Self scales: Assessment of their potential as components of social assessments for conservation projects , 2014 .

[4]  F. Mayer,et al.  The importance of connection to nature in assessing environmental education programs , 2014 .

[5]  M. Frommer,et al.  Criteria for evaluating evidence on public health interventions , 2002, Journal of epidemiology and community health.

[6]  Jim McCambridge,et al.  The Effects of Demand Characteristics on Research Participant Behaviours in Non-Laboratory Settings: A Systematic Review , 2012, PloS one.

[7]  G. Leboucher,et al.  On Public Influence on People’s Interactions with Ordinary Biodiversity , 2015, PloS one.

[8]  R. Pyle,et al.  Nature matrix: reconnecting people and nature , 2003, Oryx.

[9]  R. Kaplan,et al.  The Experience of Nature: A Psychological Perspective , 1989 .

[10]  Joanne Vining,et al.  The Distinction between Humans and Nature: Human Perceptions of Connectedness to Nature and Elements of the Natural and Unnatural , 2008 .

[11]  John M. Zelenski,et al.  The NR-6: a new brief measure of nature relatedness , 2013, Front. Psychol..

[12]  S. Wheeler,et al.  Understanding and encouraging greater nature engagement in Australia: results from a national survey , 2016 .

[13]  A. Abdel-Khalek Measuring happiness with a single-item scale , 2006 .

[14]  Don C Des Jarlais,et al.  Improving the reporting quality of nonrandomized evaluations of behavioral and public health interventions: the TREND statement. , 2004, American journal of public health.

[15]  Steven A. Murphy,et al.  The Nature Relatedness Scale , 2009 .

[16]  R. Julliard,et al.  The Need for Flexibility in Conservation Practices: Exotic Species as an Example , 2011, Environmental management.

[17]  A. Hayes Beyond Baron and Kenny: Statistical Mediation Analysis in the New Millennium , 2009 .

[18]  张静,et al.  Banana Ovate family protein MaOFP1 and MADS-box protein MuMADS1 antagonistically regulated banana fruit ripening , 2015 .

[19]  A. Dale,et al.  Celebrating the Mundane: Nature and the Built Environment , 2013 .

[20]  Mike Thelwall,et al.  Online Interventions for Social Marketing Health Behavior Change Campaigns: A Meta-Analysis of Psychological Architectures and Adherence Factors , 2011, Journal of medical Internet research.

[21]  John M. Zelenski,et al.  Underestimating Nearby Nature , 2011, Psychological science.

[22]  John M. Zelenski,et al.  The relationship between nature connectedness and happiness: a meta-analysis , 2014, Front. Psychol..

[23]  Jennifer N Solomon,et al.  The Pigeon Paradox: Dependence of Global Conservation on Urban Nature , 2006, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[24]  Xavier Basurto,et al.  Humans and Nature: How Knowing and Experiencing Nature Affect Well-Being , 2013 .

[25]  Robert L. Goldstone,et al.  Similarity-Dissimilarity Competition in Disjunctive Classification Tasks , 2013, Front. Psychology.

[26]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[27]  Kim‐Pong Tam Concepts and measures related to connection to nature: Similarities and differences , 2013 .

[28]  Steven A. Murphy,et al.  Happiness is in our Nature: Exploring Nature Relatedness as a Contributor to Subjective Well-Being , 2011 .

[29]  C. Marshall,et al.  Has the Earth’s sixth mass extinction already arrived? , 2011, Nature.

[30]  P. Schultz THE STRUCTURE OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN: CONCERN FOR SELF, OTHER PEOPLE, AND THE BIOSPHERE , 2001 .

[31]  M. Petticrew,et al.  Alternatives to randomisation in the evaluation of public health interventions: design challenges and solutions , 2009, Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health.

[32]  E. Wilson,et al.  The biophilia hypothesis , 1993 .

[33]  D. Haluza,et al.  Connectedness to Nature and Public (Skin) Health Perspectives: Results of a Representative, Population-Based Survey among Austrian Residents , 2014, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[34]  L. Green,et al.  Limitations of the randomized controlled trial in evaluating population-based health interventions. , 2007, American journal of preventive medicine.

[35]  C. Armitage,et al.  Evidence that boosters augment the long-term impact of implementation intentions on fruit and vegetable intake , 2010, Psychology & health.

[36]  C. Armitage,et al.  Comparing implementation intention interventions in relation to young adults’ intake of fruit and vegetables , 2009, Psychology & health.

[37]  C. Victora,et al.  Evaluation designs for adequacy, plausibility and probability of public health programme performance and impact. , 1999, International journal of epidemiology.

[38]  Miles Richardson,et al.  One Thousand Good Things in Nature: Aspects of Nearby Nature Associated with Improved Connection to Nature , 2015 .

[39]  P. Schultz New Environmental Theories: Empathizing With Nature: The Effects ofPerspective Taking on Concern for Environmental Issues , 2000 .

[40]  Timothy Taylor The Artificial Ape: How Technology Changed the Course of Human Evolution , 2010 .

[41]  F. Mayer,et al.  The connectedness to nature scale: A measure of individuals’ feeling in community with nature ☆ , 2004 .

[42]  Jennifer J. Tabanico,et al.  Getting to know nature: evaluating the effects of the Get to Know Program on children’s connectedness with nature , 2017 .

[43]  William Cronon,et al.  The Trouble with Wilderness: Or, Getting Back to the Wrong Nature , 1996, Environmental History.

[44]  C. Binns,et al.  Increasing fruit and vegetable consumption: success of the Western Australian Go for 2&5®campaign , 2008, Public Health Nutrition.

[45]  H. Frumkin,et al.  Nature and health. , 2014, Annual review of public health.

[46]  R. Kityo,et al.  Students and Scientists Connect with Nature in Uganda, East Africa. , 2014 .

[47]  Paul Stevens,et al.  Embedment in the environment: A new paradigm for well-being? , 2010, Perspectives in public health.

[48]  K. Gaston,et al.  Opportunity or Orientation? Who Uses Urban Parks and Why , 2014, PloS one.

[49]  M. Townsend,et al.  Healthy nature healthy people: 'contact with nature' as an upstream health promotion intervention for populations. , 2006, Health promotion international.

[50]  K. Röderer,et al.  Are nature lovers happy? On various indicators of well-being and connectedness with nature , 2012, Journal of health psychology.

[51]  N. Adler,et al.  Objective and subjective assessments of socioeconomic status and their relationship to self-rated health in an ethnically diverse sample of pregnant women. , 2000, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.