A potentially robust plasma profile control approach for ITER using real-time estimation of linearized profile response models

An active plasma profile control approach for ITER, which is potentially robust by being tolerant to changing and uncertain physics, has been explored in this work, using a technique based on real-time estimation of linearized profile response models. The linearized models approximate static responses of the plasma profiles to power changes in auxiliary heating and current drive systems. These models are updated in real-time, differing from the model-based technique which deduces a dynamic model from identification experiments. The underlying physics is simplified with several assumptions to allow real-time update of the profile response models; however, without significant loss of information necessary for feedback control of the plasma profiles. The response of the electron temperature profile is modelled by simplifying the electron heat transport equation. The response of the safety factor profile is computed by directly relating it to the changes in source current density profiles. The required actuator power changes are directly computed by inverting the response matrix using the singular value decomposition technique. The saturation of the actuator powers is taken into account and the capability of using quantized auxiliary powers is provided. The potential of our active control approach has been tested by applying it to simulations of the ITER hybrid mode operation using CRONOS. In these simulations, either a global transport model or a theory-based local transport model has been used and the electron temperature and safety factor profiles were well controlled either independently or simultaneously.

[1]  E. Joffrin,et al.  The CRONOS suite of codes for integrated tokamak modelling , 2010 .

[2]  Emilio Molina,et al.  Summary and Discussion , 2014 .

[3]  Eugenio Schuster,et al.  Optimal Tracking Control of Current Profile in Tokamaks , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology.

[4]  R. Waltz,et al.  A gyro-Landau-fluid transport model , 1997 .

[5]  Joseph A. Snipes,et al.  Latest results on the H-mode threshold using the international H-mode threshold database , 2000 .

[6]  Participant Teams,et al.  ITER: burning plasma physics experiment , 2003 .

[7]  E. Joffrin,et al.  Real-time control of internal transport barriers in JET , 2002 .

[8]  A. Murari,et al.  LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Active control of the current density profile in JET , 2003 .

[9]  Didier Mazon,et al.  Feedback control of the safety factor profile evolution during formation of an advanced tokamak discharge , 2006 .

[10]  C. Kessel,et al.  Integrated modelling of the current profile in steady-state and hybrid ITER scenarios , 2005 .

[11]  E. Schuster,et al.  Transport Parameter Estimations of Plasma Transport Dynamics Using the Extended Kalman Filter , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science.

[12]  J. T. Scoville,et al.  Stationary high-performance discharges in the DIII-D tokamak , 2002 .

[13]  R. H. Bulmer,et al.  Sustained Spheromak Physics Experiment (SSPX): design and physics results , 2012 .

[14]  E. Joffrin,et al.  A control-oriented model of the current profile in tokamak plasma , 2007 .

[15]  X. Litaudon,et al.  Predictive transport simulations of real-time profile control in JET advanced tokamak plasmas , 2005 .

[16]  C. Kessel,et al.  Simulation of the hybrid and steady state advanced operating modes in ITER , 2007 .

[17]  F. Felici,et al.  Non-linear model-based optimization of actuator trajectories for tokamak plasma profile control , 2012 .

[18]  C. Kessel,et al.  Control of plasma profiles in DIII-D discharges , 2006 .

[19]  D. A. Humphreys,et al.  Towards model-based current profile control at DIII-D , 2007 .

[20]  F. Felici,et al.  Real-time physics-model-based simulation of the current density profile in tokamak plasmas , 2011 .

[21]  A. Manini,et al.  The improved H-mode at ASDEX Upgrade: a candidate for an ITER hybrid scenario , 2005 .

[22]  Jet Efda Contributors,et al.  A two-time-scale dynamic-model approach for magnetic and kinetic profile control in advanced tokamak scenarios on JET , 2008 .

[23]  J. Hobirk,et al.  Confinement and transport properties during current ramps in the ASDEX Upgrade tokamak , 2011 .

[24]  Yongsheng Ou,et al.  Robust Control Design for the Poloidal Magnetic Flux Profile Evolution in the Presence of Model Uncertainties , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science.

[25]  Alfredo Pironti,et al.  A model-based technique for integrated real-time profile control in the JET tokamak , 2004 .

[26]  R. Budny,et al.  The ‘hybrid’ scenario in JET: towards its validation for ITER , 2005 .

[27]  F. Saint-Laurent,et al.  Integration of advanced feedback control techniques on Tore Supra , 2007 .

[28]  J. Citrin,et al.  Impact of heating and current drive mix on the ITER hybrid scenario , 2010 .

[29]  F. Imbeaux,et al.  Simulations of steady-state scenarios for Tore Supra using the CRONOS code , 2003 .

[30]  P. C. de Vries,et al.  Real-time control of the q-profile in JET for steady state advanced tokamak operation , 2003 .

[31]  E. Joffrin,et al.  Integrated plasma controls for steady state scenarios , 2007 .