Learnings from a collaborative academia –construction sector bespoke study programme – a reflective case study

The construction industry is known as a competitive, fragmented and often adversarial work environment. Maintaining high levels of productivity and profitability within such an environment frequently requires a diverse range of skills and experience. Published research investigating the application of integration, collaboration, and organizational learning has demonstrated that leveraging these concepts can begin to address fragmentation, increase integration and encourage innovative thinking thereby providing the opportunity for productivity gains within the construction industry. Two years ago a first tier New Zealand commercial construction company approached a tertiary provider to consider tendering for its management training programme. The primary aim was to focus on introducing the principles of lean construction and integrated project delivery to over 300 middle management onsite construction staff over the next 5 years. The company wanted a delivery approach that would have the greatest possible impact on staff in terms of engagement and knowledge transfer. A bespoke training programme of study was developed and delivered collaboratively with the company, for 50 managers in 2016 and another 50 in 2017. The tertiary provider drew on the latest innovations in construction education, and combined that with the partnered company's culture vision for the wider sector potentially. Feedback has been positive and constructive from the construction company partner, the programme participants and the academic staff on the programme.

[1]  T. Schofield,et al.  Critical Success Factors for Knowledge Transfer Collaborations between University and Industry , 2013 .

[2]  Richard Fellows,et al.  Managing organizational interfaces in engineering construction projects: addressing fragmentation and boundary issues across multiple interfaces , 2012 .

[3]  Nima Jafari Navimipour,et al.  Knowledge sharing mechanisms and techniques in project teams: Literature review, classification, and current trends , 2016, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[4]  Natasa Rupcic,et al.  The fifth discipline-the art and practice of the learning organisation , 2002 .

[5]  Xi Zhang,et al.  Effect of knowledge sharing visibility on incentive-based relationship in Electronic Knowledge Management Systems: An empirical investigation , 2013, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[6]  Keith R. Molenaar,et al.  Impact of Team Integration and Group Cohesion on Project Delivery Performance , 2017 .

[7]  Andrew R.J. Dainty,et al.  The extent of team integration within construction projects , 2006 .

[8]  R. Ayres,et al.  Managing curriculum change and ‘ontological uncertainty’ in tertiary education , 2014 .

[9]  Richard Fellows,et al.  Sensemaking in the cross-cultural contexts of projects , 2016 .

[10]  R. Birchmore,et al.  The XYZ of the living curriculum , 2011 .

[11]  Retrospective: tracking the impact of communications effectiveness on client satisfaction, trust and loyalty in professional services , 2016 .

[12]  P Wong.  Exploring the traction between intra-organisational and inter-organisational learning , 2015 .

[13]  Samaneh Bagheri,et al.  Classification Framework of Knowledge Transfer Issues Across Value Networks , 2016 .

[14]  S N. Ankrah,et al.  University-Industry Interorganisational Relationships for Technology/Knowledge Transfer: A Systematic Literature Review , 2013 .

[15]  Sai On Cheung,et al.  The soft power of construction contracting organisations , 2015 .

[16]  Claire Howell Major,et al.  Boundary Crossings: Cooperative Learning, Collaborative Learning, and Problem-Based Learning , 2014 .

[17]  Sarfraz A. Mian,et al.  Entrepreneurial universities: emerging models in the new social and economic landscape , 2016, Small Business Economics.

[18]  Lianying Zhang,et al.  Sharing Tacit Knowledge for Integrated Project Team Flexibility: Case Study of Integrated Project Delivery , 2013 .

[19]  Wei-Tsong Wang,et al.  Knowledge sharing practices of project teams when encountering changes in project scope: A contingency approach , 2012, J. Inf. Sci..

[20]  E. Delbufalo.  Outcomes of inter‐organizational trust in supply chain relationships: a systematic literature review and a meta‐analysis of the empirical evidence , 2012 .

[21]  A. Crane.  Rethinking construction. , 1999, Health estate.

[22]  Robin S. Poston,et al.  Designing an Academic Project Management Program: A Collaboration Between a University and a PMI Chapter , 2011, J. Inf. Syst. Educ..