MEETINGS IN THE PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT PROCESS: APPLYING DESIGN METHODS TO IMPROVE TEAM INTERACTION AND MEETING OUTCOMES

Design methods are used to support single steps of the product development process. They are expected to contribute to reducing the development time and to enhancing the degree of innovation of the outcome. But as they are time-consuming, cost-intensive and so far of little practical use, there is a call for new approaches and more appropriate selection of methods. The high level of abstraction and the theoretical overload of many design methods and their descriptions are seen as their main deficits. The inclusion of team competencies and team aspects (e.g., team size) is proposed to achieve a greater acceptance of design methods in practice. Supporting this idea, we present and evaluate the results of a single case study aiming at demonstrating the benefit of design methods in team meetings. Finally, we introduce an approach for using the observatory data to improve the use of design methods by means of an advanced methods assistance system.

[1]  Petra Badke-Schaub,et al.  METHODS IN PRACTICE – A STUDY ON REQUIREMENTS FOR DEVELOPMENT AND TRANSFER OF DESIGN METHODS , 2008 .

[2]  Joseph A. Allen,et al.  Meeting Design Characteristics and Att endee Perceptions of Staff/T eam Meeting Quality , 2011 .

[3]  Daniel Gatica-Perez,et al.  Automatic nonverbal analysis of social interaction in small groups: A review , 2009, Image Vis. Comput..

[4]  Björn W. Schuller,et al.  Acoustic emotion recognition: A benchmark comparison of performances , 2009, 2009 IEEE Workshop on Automatic Speech Recognition & Understanding.

[5]  Thomas Vietor,et al.  Konzept zur Methodenbeschreibung und -auswahl auf Basis von Kompetenzen und Zusammensetzung von Entwicklungsteams , 2014 .

[6]  Tamara Reinicke Möglichkeiten und Grenzen der Nutzerintegration in der Produktentwicklung , 2004 .

[7]  S. Löffler,et al.  THE DATABASE “METHODOS” ASSISTS AN EFFECTIVE APPLICATION OF DESIGN METHODS , 2003 .

[8]  Cornelius J. König,et al.  Meeting Preparation and Design Characteristics , 2015 .

[9]  Bradley L. Kirkman,et al.  Beyond Self-Management: Antecedents and Consequences of Team Empowerment , 1999 .

[10]  N. Lehmann-Willenbrock,et al.  Meetings Matter , 2012 .

[11]  U. Lindemann Methodische Entwicklung technischer Produkte , 2009 .

[12]  Zhihong Zeng,et al.  A Survey of Affect Recognition Methods: Audio, Visual, and Spontaneous Expressions , 2009, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[13]  Judith Jänsch Akzeptanz und Anwendung von Konstruktionsmethoden im industriellen Einsatz : Analyse und Empfehlungen aus kognitionswissenschaftlicher Sicht , 2007 .

[14]  D. Watson,et al.  Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. , 1988, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[15]  J. Bortz,et al.  Forschungsmethoden und Evaluation für Human- und Sozialwissenschaftler , 2006 .

[16]  K. Wallace,et al.  Transferring Design Methods into Practice , 2011 .

[17]  Dirk Heylen,et al.  Bridging the Gap between Social Animal and Unsocial Machine: A Survey of Social Signal Processing , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing.

[18]  Marc Graner Der Einsatz von Methoden in Produktentwicklungsprojekten , 2013 .

[19]  Petra Badke-Schaub,et al.  Towards a Designer-Centred Methodology: Descriptive Considerations and Prescriptive Reflections , 2011 .