Predicting changes in community composition and ecosystem functioning from plant traits: revisiting the Holy Grail

Summary 1. The concept of plant functional type proposes that species can be grouped according to common responses to the environment and/or common effects on ecosystem processes. However, the knowledge of relationships between traits associated with the response of plants to environmental factors such as resources and disturbances (response traits), and traits that determine effects of plants on ecosystem functions (effect traits), such as biogeochemical cycling or propensity to disturbance, remains rudimentary. 2. We present a framework using concepts and results from community ecology, ecosystem ecology and evolutionary biology to provide this linkage. Ecosystem functioning is the end result of the operation of multiple environmental filters in a hierarchy of scales which, by selecting individuals with appropriate responses, result in assemblages with varying trait composition. Functional linkages and trade-offs among traits, each of which relates to one or several processes, determine whether or not filtering by different factors gives a match, and whether ecosystem effects can be easily deduced

[1]  C. Raunkiær,et al.  The life forms of plants and statistical plant geography , 1934 .

[2]  W. Larcher Physiological Plant Ecology , 1977 .

[3]  H. Odum,et al.  Primary Productivity of the Biosphere , 1978, Ecological Studies.

[4]  J. Monteith Climate and the efficiency of crop production in Britain , 1977 .

[5]  J. Singh,et al.  The structure and function of ten Western North American grasslands: III. Net primary production, turnover and efficiencies of energy capture and water use , 1978 .

[6]  F. S. Chapin,et al.  The Mineral Nutrition of Wild Plants , 1980 .

[7]  C. Osmond,et al.  Physiological Plant Ecology I , 1981, Encyclopedia of Plant Physiology.

[8]  W. Platt,et al.  Ecology of Fire , 1984 .

[9]  T. R. E. Southwood,et al.  Tactics, strategies and templets* , 1988 .

[10]  H. W. Hunt,et al.  Nitrogen Limitation of Production and Decomposition in Prairie, Mountain Meadow, and Pine Forest , 1988 .

[11]  M. Austin Plant strategies and the dynamics and structure of plant communities , 1989 .

[12]  R. Aerts,et al.  Above-ground nutrient turnover and net primary production of an evergreen and a deciduous species in a heathland ecosystem. , 1989 .

[13]  Bill Shipley,et al.  Regeneration and Establishment Strategies of Emergent Macrophytes , 1989 .

[14]  R. Aerts Aboveground biomass and nutrient dynamics of Calluna vulgaris and Molinia caerulea in a dry heathland. , 1989 .

[15]  Robert W. Howarth,et al.  Nitrogen limitation on land and in the sea: How can it occur? , 1991 .

[16]  John Pastor,et al.  State-of-the-Art of Models of Production-Decomposition Linkages in Conifer and Grassland Ecosystems. , 1991, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[17]  F. Woodward,et al.  Functional Approaches to Predicting the Ecological Effects of Global Change , 1991 .

[18]  F. Berendse,et al.  Nitrogen mineralization in heathland ecosystems dominated by different plant species , 1992 .

[19]  Paul A. Keddy,et al.  Assembly and response rules: two goals for predictive community ecology , 1992 .

[20]  M. Westoby,et al.  Comparative evolutionary ecology of seed size. , 1992, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[21]  Michelle R. Leishman,et al.  Classifying plants into groups on the basis of associations of individual traits: evidence from Australian semi-arid woodlands , 1992 .

[22]  M. Westoby,et al.  Seedling growth in relation to seed size among species of arid Australia , 1992 .

[23]  P. Reich,et al.  Leaf Life‐Span in Relation to Leaf, Plant, and Stand Characteristics among Diverse Ecosystems , 1992 .

[24]  B. Walker Biodiversity and Ecological Redundancy , 1992 .

[25]  Ken Thompson,et al.  Seed size and shape predict persistence in soil , 1993 .

[26]  Miguel Franco,et al.  comparative plant demography - relative importance of life-cycle components to the finite rate of increase in woody and herbaceous perennials , 1993 .

[27]  Thomas M. Smith,et al.  Plant Functional Types , 1993 .

[28]  F. Stuart Chapin,et al.  16 – Functional Role of Growth Forms in Ecosystem and Global Processes , 1993 .

[29]  F. Stuart Chapin,et al.  Evolution of Suites of Traits in Response to Environmental Stress , 1993, The American Naturalist.

[30]  H. Mooney,et al.  Biodiversity and Ecosystem Function , 1994, Praktische Zahnmedizin Odonto-Stomatologie Pratique Practical Dental Medicine.

[31]  John H. Lawton,et al.  Redundancy in Ecosystems , 1994 .

[32]  O. T. Solbrig Plant Traits and Adaptive Strategies: Their Role in Ecosystem Function , 1994 .

[33]  M. Westoby,et al.  The role of large seed size in shaded conditions: experimental evidence , 1994 .

[34]  William J. Bond,et al.  Kill thy neighbour: an individulalistic argument for the evolution of flammability , 1995 .

[35]  J. P. Grime,et al.  Genome size predicts frost resistance in British herbaceous plants: implications for rates of vegetation response to global warming. , 1995 .

[36]  K. Hibbard,et al.  Aggregation of Species Properties for Biogeochemical Modeling: Empirical Results , 1995 .

[37]  I. C. Prentice,et al.  An integrated biosphere model of land surface processes , 1996 .

[38]  B. D. Campbell,et al.  25 – Interspecific Variation in the Growth Response of Plants to Elevated CO2: A Search for Functional Types , 1996 .

[39]  W. Steffen,et al.  Global vegetation models: incorporating transient changes to structure and composition , 1996 .

[40]  K. Giller,et al.  Driven by Nature: Plant Litter Quality and Decomposition , 1996 .

[41]  F. Bazzaz Plants in Changing Environments: Linking Physiological, Population, and Community Ecology , 1996 .

[42]  Wolfgang Cramer,et al.  Plant functional types and climatic change: Introduction , 1996 .

[43]  K. Thompson,et al.  Integrated screening validates primary axes of specialisation in plants , 1997 .

[44]  Petr Pyšek,et al.  Changes in Species Traits during Succession: A Search for Pattern , 1997 .

[45]  O. Kull,et al.  The relative share of graminoid and forb life-forms in a natural gradient of herb layer productivity , 1997 .

[46]  D. F. Grigal,et al.  NITROGEN MINERALIZATION AND PRODUCTIVITY IN 50 HARDWOOD AND CONIFER STANDS ON DIVERSE SOILS , 1997 .

[47]  P. Reich,et al.  From tropics to tundra: global convergence in plant functioning. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[48]  S. Díaz,et al.  Plant functional types and ecosystem function in relation to global change , 1997 .

[49]  J. Anderson,et al.  Plant litter quality and decomposition: an historical overview , 1997 .

[50]  S. Lavorel,et al.  Plant functional classifications: from general groups to specific groups based on response to disturbance. , 1997, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[51]  I. R. Noble,et al.  What are functional types and how should we seek them , 1997 .

[52]  Hendrik Poorter,et al.  Inherent Variation in Plant Growth , 1998 .

[53]  Thomas M. Smith,et al.  Plant functional types : their relevance to ecosystem properties and global change , 1998 .

[54]  Mark G. Tjoelker,et al.  Close association of RGR, leaf and root morphology, seed mass and shade tolerance in seedlings of nine boreal tree species grown in high and low light , 1998 .

[55]  Peter M. Vitousek,et al.  Effects of plant composition and diversity on nutrient cycling , 1998 .

[56]  Roderick Hunt,et al.  Allocating C-S-R plant functional types : a soft approach to a hard problem , 1999 .

[57]  Sandra Díaz,et al.  Ecological Assembly Rules: Functional implications of trait–environment linkages in plant communities , 1999 .

[58]  M. Roderick,et al.  Challenging Theophrastus: A common core list of plant traits for functional ecology , 1999 .

[59]  E. Rastetter,et al.  Effects of Plant Growth Characteristics on Biogeochemistry and Community Composition in a Changing Climate , 1999, Ecosystems.

[60]  I. Burke,et al.  Response of the Shortgrass Steppe to Changes in Rainfall Seasonality , 1999, Ecosystems.

[61]  A. Kinzig,et al.  Original Articles: Plant Attribute Diversity, Resilience, and Ecosystem Function: The Nature and Significance of Dominant and Minor Species , 1999, Ecosystems.

[62]  Mark Westoby,et al.  EVOLUTIONARY DIVERGENCES IN LEAF STRUCTURE AND CHEMISTRY, COMPARING RAINFALL AND SOIL NUTRIENT GRADIENTS , 1999 .

[63]  F. S. Chapin,et al.  The Mineral Nutrition of Wild Plants Revisited: A Re-evaluation of Processes and Patterns , 1999 .

[64]  Hendrik Poorter,et al.  A comparison of specific leaf area, chemical composition and leaf construction costs of field plants from 15 habitats differing in productivity , 1999 .

[65]  Michael Kleyer,et al.  Distribution of plant functional types along gradients of disturbance intensity and resource supply in an agricultural landscape , 1999 .

[66]  Sandra Díaz,et al.  Leaf structure and defence control litter decomposition rate across species and life forms in regional floras on two continents , 1999 .

[67]  D. Wardle,et al.  PLANT REMOVALS IN PERENNIAL GRASSLAND: VEGETATION DYNAMICS, DECOMPOSERS, SOIL BIODIVERSITY, AND ECOSYSTEM PROPERTIES , 1999 .

[68]  R. C. Muchow,et al.  Radiation Use Efficiency , 1999 .

[69]  Sandra Lavorel,et al.  Disturbance response in vegetation – towards a global perspective on functional traits , 1999 .

[70]  F. Chapin,et al.  Consequences of changing biodiversity , 2000, Nature.

[71]  Peter J. Bellingham,et al.  Resprouting as a life history strategy in woody plant communities , 2000 .

[72]  P. Reich,et al.  SEED SIZE, NITROGEN SUPPLY, AND GROWTH RATE AFFECT TREE SEEDLING SURVIVAL IN DEEP SHADE , 2000 .

[73]  N. Pavón,et al.  Distribution of Plant Life Forms along an Altitudinal Gradient in the Semi-Arid Valley of Zapotitlán, Mexico , 2000 .

[74]  W. Bond,et al.  Ecology of sprouting in woody plants: the persistence niche. , 2001, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[75]  B. Saugier Plant Strategies, Vegetation Processes, and Ecosystem Properties , 2001 .

[76]  S. Lavorel,et al.  Aardvarck to Zyzyxia- functional groups across kingdoms. , 2001, The New phytologist.

[77]  H. Mooney,et al.  23 – Estimations of Global Terrestrial Productivity: Converging toward a Single Number? , 2001 .

[78]  Ülo Niinemets,et al.  GLOBAL-SCALE CLIMATIC CONTROLS OF LEAF DRY MASS PER AREA, DENSITY, AND THICKNESS IN TREES AND SHRUBS , 2001 .

[79]  R. B. Jackson,et al.  Phenology, Growth, and Allocation in Global Terrestrial Productivity , 2001 .

[80]  Eric Garnier,et al.  Consistency of species ranking based on functional leaf traits. , 2001, The New phytologist.

[81]  David D. Ackerly,et al.  Flammability and serotiny as strategies: correlated evolution in pines , 2001 .

[82]  Sandra Lavorel,et al.  Livestock grazing in subtropical pastures: steps in the analysis of attribute response and plant functional types , 2001 .

[83]  K J Niklas,et al.  Invariant scaling relationships for interspecific plant biomass production rates and body size , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[84]  S. Díaz,et al.  Vive la différence: plant functional diversity matters to ecosystem processes , 2001 .

[85]  J. Pausas Resprouting vs seeding – a Mediterranean perspective , 2001 .

[86]  Mark Westoby,et al.  A leaf-height-seed (LHS) plant ecology strategy scheme , 1998, Plant and Soil.

[87]  M. Huston,et al.  A theory of the spatial and temporal dynamics of plant communities , 1989, Vegetatio.

[88]  I. Noble,et al.  The use of vital attributes to predict successional changes in plant communities subject to recurrent disturbances , 1980, Vegetatio.