A cloud based tool for knowledge exchange on local scale flood risk.

There is an emerging and urgent need for new approaches for the management of environmental challenges such as flood hazard in the broad context of sustainability. This requires a new way of working which bridges disciplines and organisations, and that breaks down science-culture boundaries. With this, there is growing recognition that the appropriate involvement of local communities in catchment management decisions can result in multiple benefits. However, new tools are required to connect organisations and communities. The growth of cloud based technologies offers a novel way to facilitate this process of exchange of information in environmental science and management; however, stakeholders need to be engaged with as part of the development process from the beginning rather than being presented with a final product at the end. Here we present the development of a pilot Local Environmental Virtual Observatory Flooding Tool. The aim was to develop a cloud based learning platform for stakeholders, bringing together fragmented data, models and visualisation tools that will enable these stakeholders to make scientifically informed environmental management decisions at the local scale. It has been developed by engaging with different stakeholder groups in three catchment case studies in the UK and a panel of national experts in relevant topic areas. However, these case study catchments are typical of many northern latitude catchments. The tool was designed to communicate flood risk in locally impacted communities whilst engaging with landowners/farmers about the risk of runoff from the farmed landscape. It has been developed iteratively to reflect the needs, interests and capabilities of a wide range of stakeholders. The pilot tool combines cloud based services, local catchment datasets, a hydrological model and bespoke visualisation tools to explore real time hydrometric data and the impact of flood risk caused by future land use changes. The novel aspects of the pilot tool are; the co-evolution of tools on a cloud based platform with stakeholders, policy and scientists; encouraging different science disciplines to work together; a wealth of information that is accessible and understandable to a range of stakeholders; and provides a framework for how to approach the development of such a cloud based tool in the future. Above all, stakeholders saw the tool and the potential of cloud technologies as an effective means to taking a whole systems approach to solving environmental issues. This sense of community ownership is essential in order to facilitate future appropriate and acceptable land use management decisions to be co-developed by local catchment communities. The development processes and the resulting pilot tool could be applied to local catchments globally to facilitate bottom up catchment management approaches.

[1]  Qunying Huang,et al.  Evaluating open-source cloud computing solutions for geosciences , 2013, Comput. Geosci..

[2]  S. Lane,et al.  Doing flood risk science differently: an experiment in radical scientific method , 2011 .

[3]  Andrew Titman,et al.  Measurement of flood peak effects as a result of soil and land management, with focus on experimental issues and scale. , 2014, Journal of environmental management.

[4]  R. Wilby,et al.  Scenario-neutral approach to climate change impact studies: Application to flood risk , 2010 .

[5]  Mirjam de Groot Exploring the relationship between public environmental ethics and river flood policies in western Europe. , 2012, Journal of environmental management.

[6]  Matthew T Perks,et al.  Monitoring agricultural diffuse pollution through a dense monitoring network in the River Eden Demonstration Test Catchment, Cumbria, UK , 2012 .

[7]  J Morris,et al.  The economic dimensions of integrating flood management and agri-environment through washland creation: a case from Somerset, England. , 2008, Journal of environmental management.

[8]  Patrick McAlpine,et al.  Bottom up and top down: analysis of participatory processes for sustainability indicator identification as a pathway to community empowerment and sustainable environmental management. , 2006, Journal of environmental management.

[9]  Paul D. Bates,et al.  Flood-plain mapping: a critical discussion of deterministic and probabilistic approaches , 2010 .

[10]  N. A. Odoni Hypothesis testing under uncertainty at the national scale: An application of the hydrological multi-modelling FUSE methodology for ~700 UK catchments. , 2012 .

[11]  H. Moel,et al.  Effect of uncertainty in land use, damage models and inundation depth on flood damage estimates , 2011 .

[12]  M. Reed,et al.  Encouraging collaboration for the provision of ecosystem services at a landscape scale—Rethinking agri-environmental payments , 2012 .

[13]  Michael Winter,et al.  Valuing local knowledge as a source of expert data: Farmer engagement and the design of decision support systems , 2012, Environ. Model. Softw..

[14]  Keith Beven,et al.  The Environmental Virtual Observatory (EVO) local exemplar: A cloud based local landscape learning visualisation tool for communicating flood risk to catchment stakeholders , 2013 .

[15]  Keith Beven,et al.  Modelling everything everywhere: a new approach to decision-making for water management under uncertainty , 2012 .

[16]  K. Beven Rainfall-Runoff Modelling: The Primer , 2012 .

[17]  Roland W. Scholz,et al.  Decision-making by farmers regarding ecosystem services: Factors affecting soil conservation efforts in Costa Rica , 2010 .

[18]  Tom Nisbet,et al.  From moorland to forest: the Coalburn catchment experiment , 1998 .

[19]  Bethanna Jackson,et al.  Modelling Environmental Change: Quantification of Impacts of Land Use and Land Management Change on UK Flood Risk , 2012 .

[20]  C. Kerchner,et al.  Trends in the Northeast dairy industry: large-scale modern confinement feeding and management-intensive grazing. , 2010, Journal of dairy science.

[21]  Gordon S. Blair,et al.  Building a Cloud Infrastructure for a Virtual Environmental Observatory , 2012 .

[22]  Yehia El-khatib,et al.  Web technologies for environmental Big Data , 2015, Environ. Model. Softw..

[23]  Keith Beven,et al.  Communicating uncertainty in flood inundation mapping: a case study , 2015 .

[24]  Mark Gahegan,et al.  Geospatial Cyberinfrastructure: Past, present and future , 2010, Comput. Environ. Urban Syst..

[25]  Chris Kilsby,et al.  Monitoring a flood event in a densely instrumented catchment, the Upper Eden, Cumbria, UK , 2006 .

[26]  Keith Beven,et al.  Framework for assessing uncertainty in fluvial flood risk mapping , 2014 .

[27]  Andrew Stirling,et al.  Keep it complex , 2010, Nature.

[28]  Sheila Greene,et al.  A geospatial framework to support integrated biogeochemical modelling in the United Kingdom , 2015, Environ. Model. Softw..

[29]  N. McIntyre,et al.  The impact of rural land management changes on soil hydraulic properties and runoff processes: results from experimental plots in upland UK , 2014 .

[30]  Mark G. Macklin,et al.  Changing climate and extreme floods in the British uplands , 2007 .

[31]  M G Macklin,et al.  Flood-related contamination in catchments affected by historical metal mining: an unexpected and emerging hazard of climate change. , 2014, The Science of the total environment.

[32]  Keith Beven,et al.  Climate change and fluvial flood risk in the UK: more of the same? , 2008 .

[33]  Günter Blöschl,et al.  Flood fatalities in Africa: From diagnosis to mitigation , 2010 .

[34]  Peter Fox,et al.  Changing the Equation on Scientific Data Visualization , 2011, Science.

[35]  Caspar J. M. Hewett,et al.  The Floods and Agriculture Risk Matrix: a decision support tool for effectively communicating flood risk from farmed landscapes , 2013 .

[36]  Robert L. Wilby,et al.  Adapting to flood risk under climate change , 2012 .

[37]  Peter C. Young,et al.  Testing probabilistic adaptive real‐time flood forecasting models , 2014 .

[38]  Miles R. Marshall,et al.  Identification of rural land management signals in runoff response , 2010 .

[39]  A. J. R. Burton,et al.  LAND USE AND FLOOD RISK THROUGH CATCHMENT FLOOD‐MANAGEMENT PLANS , 2003 .

[40]  M. Stutter,et al.  The Tarland Catchment Initiative and its effect on stream water quality and macroinvertebrate indices. , 2012, Journal of environmental quality.

[41]  Matthew T Perks,et al.  High-frequency monitoring of nitrogen and phosphorus response in three rural catchments to the end of the 2011–2012 drought in England , 2014 .

[42]  Andreas Wahren,et al.  Potentials and limitations of natural flood retention by forested land in headwater catchments: evidence from experimental and model studies , 2012 .

[43]  Suraje Dessai,et al.  Robust adaptation to climate change , 2010 .

[44]  K. Beven,et al.  A physically based, variable contributing area model of basin hydrology , 1979 .

[45]  Tim Hess,et al.  Estimating the impact of rural land management changes on catchment runoff generation in England and Wales , 2010 .

[46]  Mark Paine,et al.  Aligning farm decision making and genetic information systems to improve animal production: methodology and findings from the Australian dairy industry , 2010 .

[47]  Keith Beven,et al.  Exchanging environmental information and decision making: developing the local Pilot Environmental Virtual Observatory with stakeholder communities , 2012 .

[48]  N. Watson,et al.  IWRM in England: bridging the gap between top-down and bottom-up implementation , 2014 .

[49]  Gordon S. Blair,et al.  Experiences of using a hybrid cloud to construct an environmental virtual observatory , 2013, CloudDP '13.

[50]  M. Stutter,et al.  Interactions of land use and dynamic river conditions on sorption equilibria between benthic sediments and river soluble reactive phosphorus concentrations. , 2008, Water research.

[51]  Peter C. Young,et al.  Visualization approaches for communicating real‐time flood forecasting level and inundation information , 2010 .

[52]  Paul Samuels,et al.  An analysis of the current practice of policies on river flood risk management in different countries , 2006 .

[53]  G. O'Donnell,et al.  Is there a link between agricultural land-use management and flooding? , 2007 .

[54]  Keith Beven,et al.  Adaptive correction of deterministic models to produce probabilistic forecasts , 2012 .

[55]  P. Quinn,et al.  A framework for managing runoff and pollution in the rural landscape using a Catchment Systems Engineering approach. , 2014, The Science of the total environment.

[56]  Arthur C. Petersen,et al.  A method for the analysis of assumptions in model-based environmental assessments , 2011, Environ. Model. Softw..

[57]  A A Lovett,et al.  Developing Demonstration Test Catchments as a platform for transdisciplinary land management research in England and Wales. , 2014, Environmental science. Processes & impacts.

[58]  Keith Beven,et al.  Towards integrated environmental models of everywhere: uncertainty, data and modelling as a learning process , 2007 .

[59]  Mark G. Macklin,et al.  Geomorphological records of extreme floods and their relationship to decadal-scale climate change , 2014 .

[60]  Fergus L. Sinclair,et al.  Land use management effects on flood flows and sediments – guidance on prediction , 2013 .