Molecular Docking Simplified: Literature Review

Molecular docking is the prominent method for structural analysis and designing of drugs which is assisted by computer programs. The aim of docking is to predict the binding between two molecule ligand and receptor when they bind to form stable complex. The ligand could be any macromolecule but mainly this method is performed with protein of known 3-D structure. Fruitful docking method utilizes a scoring function which appropriately ranks the docking candidates. It could be utilized for performing hypothetical screening of huge collection of diverse compounds which rank the results and proposes the hypothesis of process leading to ligand blockage to intended target which is not found appropriate for the process of lead optimization which aims to increase the promising compound for enhancing its effectiveness, decreased toxicity or enhanced absorption. Beside all this, the setup of input structure for docking is as critical as the docking itself. The evaluation of the result of algorithms which could perform a broad search of design space and ignores local optima named stochastic search could also few times found to be unclear. As molecular docking had become important for drug designing so the reliable theories for this includes sampling algorithms scoring function. The distinction among the docking software and approaches of molecular docking had been mention. Also recently developed docking software Local Move Monte Carlo (LMMC) is mentioned which provides potent solution towards flexible receptor docking programs. Beside all these things, applications of molecular docking have also been described. Docking is basically a process which identifies appropriate positions of molecule with other when bound together for forming stable orientation of complex. The understanding of suitable conformation may be utilized for predicting the power of involvement in affinity of binding among two molecules with the utilization of scoring which helps in predicting the binding capability between two molecules after they have been docked. The involvement of macromolecules biologically admissible like lipids, carbohydrates, protein performs significant function in cell signaling. Moreover, the comparable orientation among 2 binding molecules could also affect the kind of signal produced. Though docking is helpful for both providing strength and type of signal produced. This technique basically works both structural and computer assisted drug designing and to identify the binding in between ligand and protein in which three dimension structure of protein is already known. Successful method of docking identifies high dimensional spaces prominently and scoring function utilization results in appropriate ranking of candidate docking. Docking can also be involve in performing screening virtually on huge libraries of molecules and give the structural hypothesis of the process ligand inhibits the target which critically leads to optimization.

[1]  J. A. T. Silva Convalescent plasma: A possible treatment of COVID-19 in India. , 2020 .

[2]  J. A. Teixeira da Silva Convalescent plasma: A possible treatment of COVID-19 in India , 2020, Medical Journal Armed Forces India.

[3]  Liliane Mouawad,et al.  Efficient conformational sampling and weak scoring in docking programs? Strategy of the wisdom of crowds , 2017, Journal of Cheminformatics.

[4]  Shuai Liu,et al.  D3R grand challenge 2015: Evaluation of protein–ligand pose and affinity predictions , 2016, Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design.

[5]  Vincent Zoete,et al.  A BOILED‐Egg To Predict Gastrointestinal Absorption and Brain Penetration of Small Molecules , 2016, ChemMedChem.

[6]  M. Sturlese,et al.  NMR‐Assisted Molecular Docking Methodologies , 2015, Molecular informatics.

[7]  Leonardo L. G. Ferreira,et al.  Molecular Docking and Structure-Based Drug Design Strategies , 2015, Molecules.

[8]  Lei Shi,et al.  What Can Crystal Structures of Aminergic Receptors Tell Us about Designing Subtype-Selective Ligands? , 2015, Pharmacological Reviews.

[9]  R. Mehrotra,et al.  A Structural Insight into Major Groove Directed Binding of Nitrosourea Derivative Nimustine with DNA: A Spectroscopic Study , 2014, PloS one.

[10]  L. Dardenne,et al.  Receptor–ligand molecular docking , 2014, Biophysical Reviews.

[11]  A. Srivastava,et al.  Interaction Studies of Anticancer Drug Lomustine with Calf Thymus DNA using Surface Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy , 2013 .

[12]  Tingjun Hou,et al.  ADMET Evaluation in Drug Discovery. 11. PharmacoKinetics Knowledge Base (PKKB): A Comprehensive Database of Pharmacokinetic and Toxic Properties for Drugs , 2012, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[13]  Ruben Abagyan,et al.  Status of GPCR modeling and docking as reflected by community-wide GPCR Dock 2010 assessment. , 2011, Structure.

[14]  M. Mezei,et al.  Molecular docking: a powerful approach for structure-based drug discovery. , 2011, Current computer-aided drug design.

[15]  David S. Goodsell,et al.  AutoDock4 and AutoDockTools4: Automated docking with selective receptor flexibility , 2009, J. Comput. Chem..

[16]  Arthur J. Olson,et al.  AutoDock Vina: Improving the speed and accuracy of docking with a new scoring function, efficient optimization, and multithreading , 2009, J. Comput. Chem..

[17]  Vincent Le Guilloux,et al.  Fpocket: An open source platform for ligand pocket detection , 2009, BMC Bioinformatics.

[18]  M. Mezei,et al.  Prediction of protein loop structures using a local move Monte Carlo approach and a grid-based force field. , 2008, Protein engineering, design & selection : PEDS.

[19]  Jonathan B. Chaires,et al.  Molecular Docking of Intercalators and Groove-Binders to Nucleic Acids Using Autodock and Surflex , 2008, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[20]  R. Friesner,et al.  Novel procedure for modeling ligand/receptor induced fit effects. , 2006, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[21]  Robin Taylor,et al.  Comparing protein–ligand docking programs is difficult , 2005, Proteins.

[22]  Dawoon Jung,et al.  Discovery of a novel class of reversible non-peptide caspase inhibitors via a structure-based approach. , 2005, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[23]  E. Jaeger,et al.  Docking: successes and challenges. , 2005, Current pharmaceutical design.

[24]  Martin Stahl,et al.  Scoring functions for protein-ligand interactions: a critical perspective. , 2004, Drug discovery today. Technologies.

[25]  J. Bajorath,et al.  Docking and scoring in virtual screening for drug discovery: methods and applications , 2004, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[26]  Shaomeng Wang,et al.  An Extensive Test of 14 Scoring Functions Using the PDBbind Refined Set of 800 Protein-Ligand Complexes , 2004, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[27]  W Patrick Walters,et al.  A detailed comparison of current docking and scoring methods on systems of pharmaceutical relevance , 2004, Proteins.

[28]  D. J. Price,et al.  Assessing scoring functions for protein-ligand interactions. , 2004, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[29]  Claudio N. Cavasotto,et al.  Protein flexibility in ligand docking and virtual screening to protein kinases. , 2004, Journal of molecular biology.

[30]  Jordi Mestres,et al.  Guided docking approaches to structure-based design and screening. , 2004, Current topics in medicinal chemistry.

[31]  Matthew P. Repasky,et al.  Glide: a new approach for rapid, accurate docking and scoring. 1. Method and assessment of docking accuracy. , 2004, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[32]  Paul Watson,et al.  Virtual Screening Using Protein-Ligand Docking: Avoiding Artificial Enrichment , 2004, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[33]  Maria Kontoyianni,et al.  Evaluation of docking performance: comparative data on docking algorithms. , 2004, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[34]  Ruth Nussinov,et al.  Predicting molecular interactions in silico: II. Protein-protein and protein-drug docking. , 2003, Current medicinal chemistry.

[35]  Richard D. Taylor,et al.  Improved protein–ligand docking using GOLD , 2003, Proteins.

[36]  B. Bosch,et al.  The Coronavirus Spike Protein Is a Class I Virus Fusion Protein: Structural and Functional Characterization of the Fusion Core Complex , 2003, Journal of Virology.

[37]  S. Teague Implications of protein flexibility for drug discovery , 2003, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[38]  Renxiao Wang,et al.  Comparative evaluation of 11 scoring functions for molecular docking. , 2003, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[39]  Gerhard Klebe,et al.  Virtual screening for submicromolar leads of tRNA-guanine transglycosylase based on a new unexpected binding mode detected by crystal structure analysis. , 2003, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[40]  Mihaly Mezei,et al.  Efficient Monte Carlo sampling for long molecular chains using local moves, tested on a solvated lipid bilayer , 2003 .

[41]  Ajay N. Jain Surflex: fully automatic flexible molecular docking using a molecular similarity-based search engine. , 2003, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[42]  Martin Stahl,et al.  Binding site characteristics in structure-based virtual screening: evaluation of current docking tools , 2003, Journal of molecular modeling.

[43]  Tingjun Hou,et al.  ADME evaluation in drug discovery , 2002, Journal of molecular modeling.

[44]  J. Irwin,et al.  Lead discovery using molecular docking. , 2002, Current opinion in chemical biology.

[45]  G. Hammes Multiple conformational changes in enzyme catalysis. , 2002, Biochemistry.

[46]  Ming-Ming Zhou,et al.  Bromodomain: an acetyl‐lysine binding domain , 2002, FEBS letters.

[47]  Todd J. A. Ewing,et al.  DOCK 4.0: Search strategies for automated molecular docking of flexible molecule databases , 2001, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[48]  Thomas Lengauer,et al.  FlexE: efficient molecular docking considering protein structure variations. , 2001, Journal of molecular biology.

[49]  R. M. Burnett,et al.  DARWIN: A program for docking flexible molecules , 2000, Proteins.

[50]  F. Bushman,et al.  Developing a dynamic pharmacophore model for HIV-1 integrase. , 2000, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[51]  Pieter F. W. Stouten,et al.  Fast prediction and visualization of protein binding pockets with PASS , 2000, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[52]  M. Deem,et al.  Analytical rebridging Monte Carlo: Application to cis/trans isomerization in proline-containing, cyclic peptides , 1999, physics/9904057.

[53]  David S. Goodsell,et al.  Automated docking using a Lamarckian genetic algorithm and an empirical binding free energy function , 1998, J. Comput. Chem..

[54]  M L Lamb,et al.  Computational approaches to molecular recognition. , 1997, Current opinion in chemical biology.

[55]  M. Sternberg,et al.  Modelling protein docking using shape complementarity, electrostatics and biochemical information. , 1997, Journal of molecular biology.

[56]  Colin McMartin,et al.  QXP: Powerful, rapid computer algorithms for structure-based drug design , 1997, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[57]  Thomas Lengauer,et al.  Multiple automatic base selection: Protein–ligand docking based on incremental construction without manual intervention , 1997, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[58]  P Willett,et al.  Development and validation of a genetic algorithm for flexible docking. , 1997, Journal of molecular biology.

[59]  I. Kuntz,et al.  Molecular docking to ensembles of protein structures. , 1997, Journal of molecular biology.

[60]  Ernst-Walter Knapp,et al.  Polypeptide folding with off-lattice Monte Carlo dynamics: the method , 1996, European Biophysics Journal.

[61]  Thomas Lengauer,et al.  A fast flexible docking method using an incremental construction algorithm. , 1996, Journal of molecular biology.

[62]  Daniel A. Gschwend,et al.  Molecular docking towards drug discovery , 1996, Journal of molecular recognition : JMR.

[63]  R. Laskowski SURFNET: a program for visualizing molecular surfaces, cavities, and intermolecular interactions. , 1995, Journal of molecular graphics.

[64]  Hans-Joachim Böhm,et al.  The development of a simple empirical scoring function to estimate the binding constant for a protein-ligand complex of known three-dimensional structure , 1994, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[65]  Robert P. Sheridan,et al.  FLOG: A system to select ‘quasi-flexible’ ligands complementary to a receptor of known three-dimensional structure , 1994, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[66]  R. Abagyan,et al.  Biased probability Monte Carlo conformational searches and electrostatic calculations for peptides and proteins. , 1994, Journal of molecular biology.

[67]  A. Leach,et al.  Ligand docking to proteins with discrete side-chain flexibility. , 1994, Journal of molecular biology.

[68]  I. Kuntz,et al.  Structure-based discovery of inhibitors of thymidylate synthase. , 1993, Science.

[69]  D. Theodorou,et al.  A concerted rotation algorithm for atomistic Monte Carlo simulation of polymer melts and glasses , 1993 .

[70]  D. Levitt,et al.  POCKET: a computer graphics method for identifying and displaying protein cavities and their surrounding amino acids. , 1992, Journal of molecular graphics.

[71]  I. Kuntz,et al.  Automated docking with grid‐based energy evaluation , 1992 .

[72]  Johan Desmet,et al.  The dead-end elimination theorem and its use in protein side-chain positioning , 1992, Nature.

[73]  R. Read,et al.  A multiple-start Monte Carlo docking method. , 1992, Proteins.

[74]  S. Kim,et al.  "Soft docking": matching of molecular surface cubes. , 1991, Journal of molecular biology.

[75]  P M Dean,et al.  Automated site-directed drug design: a general algorithm for knowledge acquisition about hydrogen-bonding regions at protein surfaces , 1989, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. B. Biological Sciences.

[76]  J M Blaney,et al.  A geometric approach to macromolecule-ligand interactions. , 1982, Journal of molecular biology.

[77]  C. Bron,et al.  Algorithm 457: finding all cliques of an undirected graph , 1973 .

[78]  N. Go,et al.  Ring Closure and Local Conformational Deformations of Chain Molecules , 1970 .

[79]  D. Koshland,et al.  CORRELATION OF STRUCTURE AND FUNCTION IN ENZYME ACTION. , 1963, Science.

[80]  Paul Bã ¼ rger Chemoinformatics In Drug Discovery , 2016 .

[81]  Ćemal B. Dolićanin,et al.  The Geometric Approach , 2014 .

[82]  Mohini Gore,et al.  Computer-aided drug designing. , 2014, Methods in molecular biology.

[83]  Amy C. Anderson and Dennis L. Wright The Design and Docking of Virtual Compound Libraries to Structures of Drug Targets , 2005 .

[84]  Nouri Neamati,et al.  Beta-diketo acid pharmacophore hypothesis. 1. Discovery of a novel class of HIV-1 integrase inhibitors. , 2005, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[85]  C. Venkatachalam,et al.  LigandFit: a novel method for the shape-directed rapid docking of ligands to protein active sites. , 2003, Journal of molecular graphics & modelling.

[86]  Aaron R. Dinner,et al.  Local deformations of polymers with nonplanar rigid main-chain internal coordinates , 2000, J. Comput. Chem..

[87]  T Schlick,et al.  The loop opening/closing motion of the enzyme triosephosphate isomerase. , 1998, Biophysical journal.

[88]  Advances in Medical, Dental and Health Sciences , 2022 .