Withdrawal of mechanical ventilation in anticipation of death in the intensive care unit.

BACKGROUND In critically ill patients who are receiving mechanical ventilation, the factors associated with physicians' decisions to withdraw ventilation in anticipation of death are unclear. The objective of this study was to examine the clinical determinants that were associated with the withdrawal of mechanical ventilation. METHODS We studied adults who were receiving mechanical ventilation in 15 intensive care units, recording base-line physiological characteristics, daily Multiple Organ Dysfunction Scores, the patient's decision-making ability, the type of life support administered, the use of do-not-resuscitate orders, the physician's prediction of the patient's status, and the physician's perceptions of the patient's preferences about the use of life support. We examined the relation between these factors and withdrawal of mechanical ventilation, using Cox proportional-hazards regression analysis. RESULTS Of 851 patients who were receiving mechanical ventilation, 539 (63.3 percent) were successfully weaned, 146 (17.2 percent) died while receiving mechanical ventilation, and 166 (19.5 percent) had mechanical ventilation withdrawn. The need for inotropes or vasopressors was associated with withdrawal of the ventilator (hazard ratio, 1.78; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.20 to 2.66; P=0.004), as were the physician's prediction that the patient's likelihood of survival in the intensive care unit was less than 10 percent (hazard ratio, 3.49; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.39 to 8.79; P=0.002), the physician's prediction that future cognitive function would be severely impaired (hazard ratio, 2.51; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.28 to 4.94; P=0.04), and the physician's perception that the patient did not want life support used (hazard ratio, 4.19; 95 percent confidence interval, 2.57 to 6.81; P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS Rather than age or the severity of the illness and organ dysfunction, the strongest determinants of the withdrawal of ventilation in critically ill patients were the physician's perception that the patient preferred not to use life support, the physician's predictions of a low likelihood of survival in the intensive care unit and a high likelihood of poor cognitive function, and the use of inotropes or vasopressors.

[1]  D. Asch,et al.  Biases in how physicians choose to withdraw life support , 1993, The Lancet.

[2]  R. Epstein,et al.  Calibrating the Physician: Personal Awareness and Effective Patient Care , 1997 .

[3]  R. Epstein,et al.  Calibrating the physician. Personal awareness and effective patient care. Working Group on Promoting Physician Personal Awareness, American Academy on Physician and Patient. , 1997, JAMA.

[4]  J. Garrett,et al.  Stability of Choices about Life-Sustaining Treatments , 1994, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[5]  K. Faber‐Langendoen.  The clinical management of dying patients receiving mechanical ventilation. A survey of physician practice. , 1994, Chest.

[6]  D. Meier,et al.  The inaccessibility of advance directives on transfer from ambulatory to acute care settings. , 1995, JAMA.

[7]  G. Wahl,et al.  Withdrawing Care: Experience in a Medical Intensive Care Unit , 1994 .

[8]  Gordon H. Guyatt,et al.  Determinants in Canadian health care workers of the decision to withdraw life support from the critically ill. Canadian Critical Care Trials Group. , 1995, JAMA.

[9]  C. Sprung,et al.  Multiple organ dysfunction score: a reliable descriptor of a complex clinical outcome. , 1995, Critical care medicine.

[10]  J. Luce,et al.  Increasing incidence of withholding and withdrawal of life support from the critically ill. , 1997, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[11]  J. Kalbfleisch,et al.  The Statistical Analysis of Failure Time Data , 1980 .

[12]  J. L. Gall,et al.  APACHE II--a severity of disease classification system. , 1986, Critical care medicine.

[13]  J. Szalai,et al.  Death in two Canadian intensive care units: Institutional difference and changes over time , 2000, Critical care medicine.

[14]  J. Luce,et al.  A national survey of end-of-life care for critically ill patients. , 1998, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[15]  A S Detsky,et al.  Prognosis, survival, and the expenditure of hospital resources for patients in an intensive-care unit. , 1981, The New England journal of medicine.

[16]  J. Slomka.  The negotiation of death: clinical decision making at the end of life. , 1992, Social science & medicine.

[17]  E. Emanuel,et al.  Four models of the physician-patient relationship. , 1992, JAMA.

[18]  Gordon H. Guyatt,et al.  Determinants in Canadian health care workers of the decision to withdraw life support from the critically ill. Canadian Critical Care Trials Group. , 1995 .

[19]  D. Cook,et al.  Withdrawing and withholding life support in the intensive care unit: a Spanish prospective multi-centre observational study , 2001, Intensive Care Medicine.

[20]  H. Brody,et al.  Physician Recommendations and Patient Autonomy: Finding a Balance between Physician Power and Patient Choice , 1996, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[21]  S. Keenan,et al.  Withdrawal and withholding of life support in the intensive care unit: a comparison of teaching and community hospitals. The Southwestern Ontario Critical Care Research Network. , 1998, Critical care medicine.

[22]  F. Lemaire,et al.  Withholding and withdrawal of life support in intensive-care units in France: a prospective survey , 2001, The Lancet.

[23]  D. Asch,et al.  Medical specialists prefer to withdraw familiar technologies when discontinuing life support , 1995, Journal of general internal medicine.

[24]  R. Houts,et al.  Modal Preferences Predict Elderly Patients' Life-sustaining Treatment Choices as Well as Patients' Chosen Surrogates Do , 2000, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[25]  Withholding and withdrawal of life support from the critically ill. , 1990, The New England journal of medicine.

[26]  E. Martin,et al.  Withholding and withdrawing life-sustaining therapy in a Canadian intensive care unit , 1995 .

[27]  W. Knaus,et al.  Preferences for cardiopulmonary resuscitation: physician-patient agreement and hospital resource use. The SUPPORT Investigators. , 1995, Journal of general internal medicine.

[28]  D. Bartels,et al.  Process of forgoing life‐sustaining treatment in a university hospital: An empirical study , 1992, Critical care medicine.

[29]  J. Vincent,et al.  Forgoing life support in western European intensive care units: the results of an ethical questionnaire. , 1999, Critical care medicine.

[30]  W. Knaus,et al.  Do-Not-Resuscitate Orders in Intensive Care Units: Current Practices and Recent Changes , 1994 .

[31]  D. Asch,et al.  Why do physicians prefer to withdraw some forms of life support over others? Intrinsic attributes of life-sustaining treatments are associated with physicians' preferences. , 1996, Medical care.

[32]  R. Hall,et al.  End-of-life care in the ICU: treatments provided when life support was or was not withdrawn. , 2000, Chest.

[33]  K. Faber-Langendoen,et al.  A multi-institutional study of care given to patients dying in hospitals. Ethical and practice implications. , 1996, Archives of internal medicine.

[34]  G. Guyatt,et al.  Cardiopulmonary resuscitation directives on admission to intensive-care unit: an international observational study , 2001, The Lancet.

[35]  Frank E. Harrell,et al.  Identification of Comatose Patients at High Risk for Death or Severe Disability , 1995 .

[36]  S. Keenan,et al.  A retrospective review of a large cohort of patients undergoing the process of withholding or withdrawal of life support. , 1997, Critical care medicine.

[37]  Barbara Gandek,et al.  Characteristics of Physicians with Participatory Decision-Making Styles , 1996, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[38]  W. Knaus,et al.  APACHE II: a severity of disease classification system. , 1985 .