Adolescents' favourite places and environmental self-regulation

The objective of the study was to give credence to the argument that favourite places are used as a means of regulating unpleasant and pleasant feelings, the coherence of self-experience, and self-esteem. High school and vocational school students (n = 144), 17 and 18 years of age, wrote essays about their favourite place, describing the situational and/or emotional context for seeking out a favourite place and the experiences they had there. The essays that emphasized the importance of the place itself (n = 19) rather than social experiences or recreational facilities were included in the content analysis. Internal thoughts and feelings, external stimuli and social conflicts that threatened self-esteem and the coherence of self-experience were the reasons given for going to a favourite place. Since these rationales led to experiences emphasizing the avoidance of pain and threats to self, and to the effort to maintain self-esteem and produce coherence to one's self-experience, the interpretation of these experiences as environmental self-regulation is more warranted than previously. However, this observation is still based on retrospective self-reports alone. Positive and supportive experiences also preceded the visit to the favourite place. This suggests hypotheses for future studies; positive experiences may just be prolonged in a favourite place or they may create incoherence in selfexperience, thus necessitating introspection in a favourite place.

[1]  R. Ulrich Visual landscapes and psychological well‐being , 1979 .

[2]  R. Ulrich Aesthetic and Affective Response to Natural Environment , 1983 .

[3]  K. Eyferth,et al.  Development as Action in Context , 1986 .

[4]  R. Kaplan,et al.  The Experience of Nature: A Psychological Perspective , 1989 .

[5]  John M. Neale,et al.  Science and behavior : an introduction to methods of research / John M. Neale , 1973 .

[6]  Preference and meaning of arboretum landscapes: Combining quantitative and qualitative data , 1991 .

[7]  S. Freud Beyond the Pleasure Principle , 1925 .

[8]  K. Eyferth,et al.  Place for Development: Adolescents, Leisure Settings, and Developmental Tasks , 1986 .

[9]  I. Altman,et al.  Handbook of environmental psychology , 1987 .

[10]  Mira Engler EXPERIENCE AT VIEW PLACES: AN INQUIRY INTO THE EMOTIONAL TIES BETWEEN PEOPLE AND PLACES. , 1990 .

[11]  Stephen Kaplan,et al.  Psychological Benefits of a Wilderness Experience , 1983 .

[12]  K. Craik,et al.  Editor's Introduction , 1977 .

[13]  Irwin Altman,et al.  Human Behavior and Environment , 1977, Springer US.

[14]  Turo Reenkola Pol. Mag. The Position of Metapsychology in the Formation of Psychoanalytic Knowledge and the Concept of “I” (Ego) , 1983 .

[15]  Richard C. Knopf,et al.  Recreational Needs and Behavior in Natural Settings , 1983 .

[16]  E. Rochberg-Halton,et al.  Object Relations, Role Models, and Cultivation of the Self , 1984 .

[17]  Stephen Kaplan,et al.  A Model of Person-Environment Compatibility , 1983 .

[18]  S. Epstein The Implications of Cognitive‐experiential Self‐theory for Research in Social Psychology and Personality1 , 1985 .

[19]  Irwin Altman,et al.  Human behavior and environment : advances in theory and research , 1976 .

[20]  R. Hart,et al.  Children's experience of place , 1979 .

[21]  G. Evans,et al.  Restorative Effects of Natural Environment Experiences , 1991 .

[22]  S. Epstein The self-concept revisited. Or a theory of a theory. , 1973, The American psychologist.

[23]  Brian R. Little,et al.  Personal Projects , 1983, The Wiley Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences.

[24]  K. Korpela Place-identity as a product of environmental self-regulation , 1989 .

[25]  R. Simons,et al.  Stress recovery during exposure to natural and urban environments , 1991 .

[26]  George A. Lundberg,et al.  The Use of Personal Documents in Psychological Science. , 1942 .