Biomass production and energy balance of a 12‐year‐old short‐rotation coppice poplar stand under different cutting cycles

Given today's political targets, energy production from agricultural areas is likely to increase and therefore needs to be more sustainable. The aim of this study was thus to carry out a long‐term field trial based on the poplar short‐rotation coppice (SRC), in order to compare dry matter, energy‐use efficiency and the net energy yield obtainable from this crop in relation to different harvest frequencies (1‐, 2‐ and 3‐year cutting cycles). The results showed that poplar SRC performed very well under temperate climates as it can survive up to 12 years, providing a considerable annual biomass yield (9.9, 13.8, 16.4 t ha−1 yr−1 for annual T1, biannual T2 and triennial T3 cutting cycles, respectively). The system tested in southern Europe showed a positive energy balance characterized by a high energy efficiency. We found that the choice of harvest interval had huge consequences in terms of energy yields. In fact, the energy efficiency improved from T1 to T2 and T3, while the net energy yield increased from 172 to 299 GJ ha−1 yr−1. This study suggests that, with 3‐year harvest cycles, poplar SRC can contribute to agronomic and environmental sustainability not only in terms of its high yield and energy efficiency but also in terms of its positive influence on limiting soil tillage and on the environment, given its low pesticide and nutrient requirements.

[1]  R. Ceulemans,et al.  Dynamics of biomass production in a poplar coppice culture over three rotations (11 years) , 2008 .

[2]  R. Ceulemans,et al.  Growth and production of a short rotation coppice culture of poplar. III. Second rotation results , 2005 .

[3]  B. Basso,et al.  Energy Use and Economic Evaluation of a Three Year Crop Rotation for Conservation and Organic Farming in NE Italy , 2005 .

[4]  Bruce R. Hartsough,et al.  Harvesting SRF poplar for pulpwood: Experience in the Pacific Northwest , 2006 .

[5]  P. Heilman,et al.  Effect of harvest cycle and spacing on productivity of black cottonwood in intensive culture , 1981 .

[6]  M. Moscatelli,et al.  Short- and medium-term contrasting effects of nitrogen fertilization on C and N cycling in a poplar plantation soil , 2008 .

[7]  T. Volk,et al.  Willow biomass production during ten successive annual harvests , 2001 .

[8]  Traian I. Teodorescu,et al.  Field performance and biomass production of 12 willow and poplar clones in short-rotation coppice in southern Quebec (Canada) , 2005 .

[9]  Franz Makeschin,et al.  Short-rotation plantations of balsam poplars, aspen and willows on former arable land in the Federal Republic of Germany. I. Site–growth relationships , 1999 .

[10]  C. Gasol,et al.  Economic assessment and comparison of acacia energy crop with annual traditional crops in Southern Europe , 2010 .

[11]  R. Ceulemans,et al.  Biomass production of 17 poplar clones in a short-rotation coppice culture on a waste disposal site and its relation to soil characteristics , 2004 .

[12]  Carles M. Gasol,et al.  Feasibility assessment of poplar bioenergy systems in the Southern Europe , 2009 .

[13]  E. Bonari,et al.  Evapotranspiration and crop coefficient of poplar and willow short-rotation coppice used as vegetation filter. , 2008, Bioresource technology.

[14]  David Pimentel,et al.  Use of energy analyses in silvicultural decision-making. , 2006 .

[15]  M. Proe,et al.  Effects of spacing, species and coppicing on leaf area, light interception and photosynthesis in short rotation forestry , 2002 .

[16]  M. Acaroğlu,et al.  The cultivation and energy balance of Miscanthus×giganteus production in Turkey , 2005 .

[17]  T. Blake.  Coppice systems for short-rotation intensive forestry: the influence of cultural, seasonal and plant factors. , 1983 .

[18]  E. Bonari,et al.  Bark content estimation in poplar (Populus deltoides L.) short-rotation coppice in Central Italy , 2008 .

[19]  S. Nonhebel.  Energy yields in intensive and extensive biomass production systems , 2002 .

[20]  Enrico Bonari,et al.  Long-term evaluation of biomass production and quality of two cardoon (Cynara cardunculus L.) cultivars for energy use , 2009 .

[21]  P. Börjesson.  Environmental effects of energy crop cultivation in Sweden—I: Identification and quantification , 1999 .

[22]  I. Tubby,et al.  Effects of spacing and cutting cycle on the yield of poplar grown as an energy crop , 1999 .

[23]  Enrico Bonari,et al.  Comparison of Arundo donax L. and Miscanthus x giganteus in a long-term field experiment in Central Italy: Analysis of productive characteristics and energy balance , 2009 .

[24]  C. Campbell,et al.  Effect of crop rotations and fertilization on energy balance in typical production systems on the Canadian Prairies , 1989 .

[25]  M. Mazzoncini,et al.  Energy efficiency in long-term Mediterranean cropping systems with different management intensities , 2011 .

[26]  G. Marland,et al.  A synthesis of carbon sequestration, carbon emissions, and net carbon flux in agriculture: comparing tillage practices in the United States , 2002 .

[27]  I. Lewandowski,et al.  Comparing annual and perennial energy cropping systems with different management intensities , 2008 .

[28]  C. P. Mitchell,et al.  New cultural treatments and yield optimisation , 1995 .

[29]  V. Scholz,et al.  Energy balance of solid biofuels. , 1998 .

[30]  A. Antón,et al.  LCA of poplar bioenergy system compared with Brassica carinata energy crop and natural gas in regional scenario , 2009 .

[31]  G. Wuehlisch,et al.  Aspen for short-rotation coppice plantations on agricultural sites in Germany: Effects of spacing and rotation time on growth and biomass production of aspen progenies , 1999 .

[32]  R. Matthews,et al.  Modelling of energy and carbon budgets of wood fuel coppice systems , 2001 .

[33]  Reinhart Ceulemans,et al.  Biomass yield of poplar after five 2-year coppice rotations , 1999 .

[34]  G. Keoleian,et al.  Life cycle assessment of a willow bioenergy cropping system , 2003 .

[35]  R. Ceulemans,et al.  Production physiology and growth potential of poplars under short-rotation forestry culture , 1999 .

[36]  Bart Muys,et al.  Poplar growth and yield in short rotation coppice: model simulations using the process model SECRETS , 2004 .

[37]  Xavier Dubuisson,et al.  Energy and CO2 balances in different power generation routes using wood fuel from short rotation coppice , 1998 .

[38]  M. Pei,et al.  Rust resistance of some varieties and recently bred genotypes of biomass willows , 2008 .

[39]  R. Norby,et al.  Nutrient cycling and fertility management in temperate short rotation forest systems , 1998 .

[40]  P. Hakkila,et al.  Fuel resources from the forest. , 2002 .

[41]  Nachwachsende Energieträger: Grundlagen, Verfahren, ökologische Bilanzierung Hrsg.: Martin Kaltschmitt , 1998 .

[42]  J. Zavitkovski,et al.  Energy Production in Irrigated, Intensively Cultured Plantations of Populus 'Tristis #1' and Jack Pine , 1979 .

[43]  Enrico Bonari,et al.  Biomass yield and energy balance of giant reed (Arundo donax L.) cropped in central Italy as related to different management practices , 2005 .