Vertical image registration in stereopsis

Most computational theories of stereopsis require a registration stage prior to stereo matching to reduce the matching to a one-dimensional search. Even after registration, it is critical that the stereo matching process tolerate some degree of residual misalignment. We have studied the tolerance to vertical disparity in situations in which false targets abound and corrective eye movements are eliminated. Our main results are: vertical disparity of only the central "figure" part of a random dot stereogram can be tolerated up to about 3.5', and vertical disparity of the "figure + ground" is tolerated up to about 6.5' in the presence of monocular cues to vertical disparity. Our data suggest that this tolerance is attained by two non-motor mechanisms: the spatial average performed by the receptive fields that filter the two images prior to stereo matching, and a non-motor shift mechanism that may be driven at least in part by monocular cues.

[1]  M. Posner,et al.  Orienting of Attention* , 1980, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[2]  T. Poggio,et al.  A computational theory of human stereo vision , 1979, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[3]  John E. W. Mayhew,et al.  Psychophysical and Computational Studies Towards a Theory of Human Stereopsis , 1981, Artif. Intell..

[4]  W E Grimson,et al.  A computer implementation of a theory of human stereo vision. , 1981, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[5]  A L Duwaer Nonmotor component of fusional response to vertical disparity: a second look using an afterimage method. , 1982, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[6]  Christopher W. Tyler,et al.  Spatio-temporal properties of Panum's fusional area , 1981, Vision Research.

[7]  B. Julesz Foundations of Cyclopean Perception , 1971 .

[8]  B. Julesz,et al.  Extension of Panum's fusional area in binocularly stabilized vision. , 1967, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[9]  J. E. W. Mayhew,et al.  A computational model of binocular depth perception , 1982, Nature.

[10]  J. Bergen,et al.  A four mechanism model for threshold spatial vision , 1979, Vision Research.

[11]  R S Harwerth,et al.  Viewing Time and Stereoscopic Threshold with Random‐Dot Stereograms , 1977, American journal of optometry and physiological optics.

[12]  Thomas O. Binford,et al.  Depth from Edge and Intensity Based Stereo , 1981, IJCAI.

[13]  Kenneth J. Ciuffreda,et al.  Vergence eye movements : basic and clinical aspects , 1983 .