A Unified Theory of Adaptive Subspace Detection Part II: Numerical Examples

This paper is devoted to the performance analysis of the detectors proposed in the companion paper (Orlando et al., 2022) where a comprehensive design framework is presented for the adaptive detection of subspace signals. The framework addresses four variations on subspace detection: the subspace may be known or known only by its dimension; consecutive visits to the subspace may be unconstrained or they may be constrained by a prior probability distribution. In this paper, Monte Carlo simulations are used to compare the detectors derived in (Orlando et al., 2022) with estimate-and-plug (EP) approximations of the generalized likelihood ratio (GLR) detectors. Remarkably, some of the EP approximations appear here for the first time (at least to the best of the authors' knowledge). The numerical examples indicate that GLR detectors are effective for the detection of partially-known signals affected by inherent uncertainties due to the system or the operating environment. In particular, if the signal subspace is known, GLR detectors tend to ouperform EP detectors. If, instead, the signal subspace is known only by its dimension, the performance of GLR and EP detectors is very similar. Actually, there does not exist a general rule for recommending the first-order approach with respect to the second-order one and vice versa. Nevertheless, the analysis contains a specific case where the second-order detectors can outperform the first-order detectors.

[1]  L. Scharf,et al.  A Unified Theory of Adaptive Subspace Detection Part I: Detector Designs , 2021, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[2]  Danilo Orlando,et al.  Adaptive Radar Detection and Classification Algorithms for Multiple Coherent Signals , 2020, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[3]  G. Ricci,et al.  Learning Strategies for Radar Clutter Classification , 2020, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[4]  Meiping Song,et al.  Orthogonal Subspace Projection Target Detector for Hyperspectral Anomaly Detection , 2021, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing.

[5]  Marco Diani,et al.  Subspace-Based Target Detection in LWIR Hyperspectral Imaging , 2020, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[6]  Danilo Orlando,et al.  New ECCM Techniques Against Noiselike and/or Coherent Interferers , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[7]  Ying Zhang,et al.  A Hyperspectral Subspace Target Detection Method Based on AMUSE , 2019, Int. J. Pattern Recognit. Artif. Intell..

[8]  Jian Li,et al.  Robust Detection in MIMO Radar With Steering Vector Mismatches , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[9]  Siyu Sun,et al.  One-Step Persymmetric GLRT for Subspace Signals , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[10]  R. Sarpong,et al.  Bio-inspired synthesis of xishacorenes A, B, and C, and a new congener from fuscol† †Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available. See DOI: 10.1039/c9sc02572c , 2019, Chemical science.

[11]  Eric Chaumette,et al.  Generalized Likelihood Ratio Test for Detection of Gaussian Rank-One Signals in Gaussian Noise With Unknown Statistics , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[12]  Danilo Orlando,et al.  Advanced Radar Detection Schemes Under Mismatched Signal Models , 2009, Advanced Radar Detection Schemes Under Mismatched Signal Models.

[13]  Henry Cox,et al.  Eigenvalue Beamforming Using a Multirank MVDR Beamformer and Subspace Selection , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[14]  Olivier Besson,et al.  GLRT-Based Direction Detectors in Homogeneous Noise and Subspace Interference , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[15]  Giuseppe Ricci,et al.  Adaptive Radar Detection of Distributed Targets in Homogeneous and Partially Homogeneous Noise Plus Subspace Interference , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[16]  Giuseppe Ricci,et al.  Adaptive Radar Detection of Extended Gaussian Targets , 2004 .

[17]  P. Stoica,et al.  Cyclic minimizers, majorization techniques, and the expectation-maximization algorithm: a refresher , 2004, IEEE Signal Process. Mag..

[18]  Mukund Desai,et al.  Robust Gaussian and non-Gaussian matched subspace detection , 2003, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[19]  A. Farina,et al.  Vector subspace detection in compound-Gaussian clutter. Part I: survey and new results , 2002 .

[20]  L. Scharf,et al.  A review of matched and adaptive subspace detectors , 2000, Proceedings of the IEEE 2000 Adaptive Systems for Signal Processing, Communications, and Control Symposium (Cat. No.00EX373).

[21]  L. Scharf,et al.  The CFAR adaptive subspace detector is a scale-invariant GLRT , 1998, Ninth IEEE Signal Processing Workshop on Statistical Signal and Array Processing (Cat. No.98TH8381).

[22]  James Ward,et al.  Space-time adaptive processing for airborne radar , 1994, 1995 International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing.

[23]  L. Scharf,et al.  Matched subspace detectors , 1993, Proceedings of 27th Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers.

[24]  Daniel R. Fuhrmann,et al.  A CFAR adaptive matched filter detector , 1992 .

[25]  E J Kelly,et al.  Adaptive Detection and Parameter Estimation for Multidimensional Signal Models , 1989 .

[26]  Y. Bresler Maximum likelihood estimation of a linearly structured covariance with application to antenna array processing , 1988, Fourth Annual ASSP Workshop on Spectrum Estimation and Modeling.