Infants' sensitivity to word boundaries in fluent speech

Infants' sensitivity to word units in fluent speech was examined by inserting I sec pauses either at boundaries between successive words (Coincident versions) or between syllables within words (Noncoincident versions). In Experiment 1, 24 11-month-olds listened significantly longer to the Coincident versions. In Experiment 2, 24 four-and-a-half- and 24 nine-month-olds did not exhibit the preference for the Coincident versions that the 11-month-olds showed. When the stimuli were low-pass filtered in Experiment 3, 24 11-month-olds showed no preference for the Coincident versions, suggesting they rely on more than prosodic cues. New stimulus materials in Experiment 4 indicated that responses by 24 11-month-olds to the Coincident and Noncoindent versions did not depend solely on prior familiarity with the targets. Two groups of 30 11-month-olds tested in Experiment 5 were as sensitive to groups of 30 11-month-olds tested in Experiment 5 were as sensitive to boundaries for Strong/Weak words as for Weak/Strong words. Taken together, the results suggest that, by 11 months, infants are sensitive to word boundaries in fluent speech, and that this sensitivity depends on more than just prosodic information or prior knowledge of the words.

[1]  Kari Suomi,et al.  An outline of a developmental model of adult phonological organization and behavior , 1993 .

[2]  Robert Grieve,et al.  The development of young children's awareness of the word as a unit of spoken language , 1983, Journal of Psycholinguistic Research.

[3]  D. Stern,et al.  The prosody of maternal speech: infant age and context related changes , 1983, Journal of Child Language.

[4]  R. Cole,et al.  How are syllables used to recognize words? , 1980, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  J. Mehler,et al.  Syllables as units in infant speech perception , 1981 .

[6]  Peter W. Jusczyk,et al.  Does sentential prosody help infants organize and remember speech information? , 1994, Cognition.

[7]  P. Jusczyk,et al.  Two-month-old infants’ sensitivity to allophonic differences , 1994, Perception & psychophysics.

[8]  K. Stevens,et al.  Linguistic experience alters phonetic perception in infants by 6 months of age. , 1992, Science.

[9]  T. A. Cartwright,et al.  Distributional regularity and phonotactic constraints are useful for segmentation , 1996, Cognition.

[10]  A. Woodward,et al.  Perception of acoustic correlates of major phrasal units by young infants , 1992, Cognitive Psychology.

[11]  P. Jusczyk,et al.  Infants' sensitivity to phonotactic patterns in the native language. , 1994 .

[12]  P. Jusczyk,et al.  The head-turn preference procedure for testing auditory perception , 1995 .

[13]  J. Werker,et al.  Cognitive Influences on Cross-Language Speech Perception in Infancy , 1995 .

[14]  A. Friederici,et al.  Phonotactic knowledge of word boundaries and its use in infant speech perception , 1993, Perception & psychophysics.

[15]  J R Saffran,et al.  Emerging integration of sequential and suprasegmental information in preverbal speech segmentation. , 1995, Child development.

[16]  Anne Cutler,et al.  The predominance of strong initial syllables in the English vocabulary , 1987 .

[17]  James L. Morgan,et al.  Converging measures of speech segmentation in preverbal infants , 1994 .

[18]  P. Jusczyk,et al.  Infants′ Detection of the Sound Patterns of Words in Fluent Speech , 1995, Cognitive Psychology.

[19]  P. Jusczyk,et al.  Infants' preference for the predominant stress patterns of English words. , 1993, Child development.

[20]  J. Werker,et al.  Developmental changes in perception of nonnative vowel contrasts. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[21]  Carolyn Chaney.  I pledge a legiance tothe flag: Three studies in word segmentation , 1989, Applied Psycholinguistics.

[22]  J. Werker,et al.  Cross-language speech perception: Evidence for perceptual reorganization during the first year of life , 1984 .

[23]  B. Hayes.  A metrical theory of stress rules , 1980 .

[24]  Walter H. MacGinitie,et al.  Children's Conceptions of Word Boundaries in Speech and Print. , 1972 .

[25]  P. Jusczyk,et al.  When prosody fails to cue syntactic structure: 9-month-olds' sensitivity to phonological versus syntactic phrases , 1994, Cognition.

[26]  Kenneth Ward Church,et al.  Phonological parsing and lexical retrieval , 1987, Cognition.

[27]  P. Jusczyk,et al.  Clauses are perceptual units for young infants , 1987, Cognition.

[28]  A. Cutler,et al.  Rhythmic cues to speech segmentation: Evidence from juncture misperception , 1992 .

[29]  J. Mehler,et al.  Do infants perceive word boundaries? An empirical study of the bootstrapping of lexical acquisition. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[30]  Kathy Hirsh-Pasek,et al.  A moment of silence: How the prosodic cues in motherese might assist language learning , 1986 .

[31]  P. Jusczyk,et al.  Infants′ Sensitivity to the Sound Patterns of Native Language Words , 1993 .

[32]  Anne Cutler,et al.  The role of strong syllables in segmentation for lexical access , 1988 .

[33]  David J. Messer.  The identification of names in maternal speech to infants , 1981 .

[34]  H. Benedict,et al.  Early lexical development: comprehension and production , 1979, Journal of Child Language.

[35]  P. Jusczyk,et al.  Young infants' retention of information about bisyllabic utterances. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[36]  J. Morgan.  A Rhythmic Bias in Preverbal Speech Segmentation , 1996 .