Transcallosal inhibition in cortical and subcortical cerebral vascular lesions

The excitability of the motor cortex after transcranial magnetic stimulation was investigated in 10 patients with purely subcortical, and in 22 patients with cortical-subcortical cerebrovascular lesions. In the first investigation we applied magnetic double stimuli over both motor cortices with different inter-stimulus intervals. The first (conditioning) stimulus was applied to the affected hemisphere and the second stimulus (test stimulus) to the unaffected side. The responses of the first dorsal interosseal (FDI) muscle, contralateral to the test stimulus, were recorded after applying the test stimulus alone and at inter-stimulus intervals of 5 ms, 7 ms, 15 ms, 30 ms and 60 ms. In a second investigation the patients were asked to activate their non-paretic first dorsal interosseus muscle and the magnetic stimulus was applied over the affected hemisphere. The EMG responses were rectified and averaged. Patients with subcortical cerebral lesions below the centrum semiovale (i.e., having no effect on the transcallosal fibres) displayed a pronounced inhibition of one motor cortex after the stimulation of the contralateral side, comparable with normal subjects. Patients with cortical-subcortical cerebral lesions displayed only partly less inhibition of their motor cortex but the results in this group were not uniform. Since inhibition was preserved in patients with subcortical lesions, which had destroyed the corticospinal tract, we conclude that this inhibition is not mediated through an ipsilateral projection but via a transcallosal route.

[1]  D. Burke,et al.  Corticospinal volleys evoked by anodal and cathodal stimulation of the human motor cortex. , 1990, The Journal of physiology.

[2]  B. Meyer,et al.  Inhibitory and excitatory interhemispheric transfers between motor cortical areas in normal humans and patients with abnormalities of the corpus callosum. , 1995, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[3]  R. Sperry Lateral specialization in the surgically separated hemispheres. , 1974 .

[4]  V E Amassian,et al.  A comparison of corticospinal activation by magnetic coil and electrical stimulation of monkey motor cortex. , 1990, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[5]  C. Marsden,et al.  Corticocortical inhibition in human motor cortex. , 1993, The Journal of physiology.

[6]  K. Krnjević,et al.  Pharmacology of cortical inhibition , 1966, The Journal of physiology.

[7]  K. Krnjević,et al.  Nature of a cortical inhibitory process , 1966, The Journal of physiology.

[8]  H. Asanuma,et al.  Effects of transcallosal volleys on pyramidal tract cell activity of cat. , 1962, Journal of neurophysiology.

[9]  H. Asanuma,et al.  Unitary study on evoked activity of callosal neurons and its effect on pyramidal tract cell activity on cats. , 1959, The Japanese journal of physiology.

[10]  Jordan Grafman,et al.  Handbook of Neuropsychology , 1991 .

[11]  V. Amassian,et al.  Focal stimulation of human cerebral cortex with the magnetic coil: a comparison with electrical stimulation. , 1989, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[12]  K. Mills,et al.  Responses in small hand muscles from magnetic stimulation of the human brain. , 1987, The Journal of physiology.

[13]  V. Swayze,et al.  Two Hemispheres—One Brain: Functions of the Corpus Callosum , 1987 .

[14]  J. Kaas,et al.  The relation of corpus callosum connections to architectonic fields and body surface maps in sensorimotor cortex of new and old world monkeys , 1983, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[15]  K. Krnjević,et al.  An inhibitory process in the cerebral cortex , 1966, The Journal of physiology.

[16]  M. Hallett,et al.  Effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation on ipsilateral muscles , 1991, Neurology.

[17]  B. Day,et al.  Interhemispheric inhibition of the human motor cortex. , 1992, The Journal of physiology.

[18]  B. Day,et al.  Electric and magnetic stimulation of human motor cortex: surface EMG and single motor unit responses. , 1989, The Journal of physiology.

[19]  H. Curtis INTERCORTICAL CONNECTIONS OF CORPUS CALLOSUM AS INDICATED BY EVOKED POTENTIALS , 1940 .

[20]  S. Miller,et al.  Excitation of the corticospinal tract by electromagnetic and electrical stimulation of the scalp in the macaque monkey. , 1990, The Journal of physiology.

[21]  J. R. Hughes Basic mechanisms of neuronal hyperexcitability , 1984 .

[22]  J. Kaas,et al.  The relationship of corpus callosum connections to electrical stimulation maps of motor, supplementary motor, and the frontal eye fields in owl monkeys , 1986, The Journal of comparative neurology.