A comparison of JIT and TOC buffering philosophies on system performance with unplanned machine downtime

The impact of buffering under just in time (JIT) and theory of constraints (TOC) is studied to determine whether a difference in performance exists in systems faced with unplanned machine downtime. Comparisons are based on results obtained from simulation of a five-station cell utilised in computer substrate manufacturing. Analysis of the simulation output suggests that the TOC technique, drum–buffer–rope (DBR), achieves higher levels of performance as measured by total output and lead time while reducing inventory requirements relative to the tested JIT technique, Kanban. Improved system performance stems from the strategic placement of buffers in DBR, which maximises protection of the constraint from variation rather than attempting to protect each individual station. Further, analysis suggests that DBR systems are more robust than JIT systems in that they are able to maintain higher levels of system performance across a range of inventory levels.

[1]  Lorraine R. Gardiner,et al.  Drum‐Buffer‐Rope and Buffer Management: Impact on Production Management Study and Practices , 1993 .

[2]  J. George Shanthikumar,et al.  A GENERAL APPROACH FOR COORDINATING PRODUCTION IN MULTIPLE‐CELL MANUFACTURING SYSTEMS , 1992 .

[3]  Norman M. Sadeh,et al.  An empirical study of policies to integrate reactive scheduling and control in just-in-time job shop environments , 2004 .

[4]  Arnoldo C. Hax,et al.  Production and inventory management , 1983 .

[5]  M. Michael Umble,et al.  Synchronous Manufacturing: Principles for World Class Excellence , 1995 .

[6]  Satya S. Chakravorty,et al.  A comparative study of line design approaches for serial production systems , 1996 .

[7]  Shie-Gheun Koh,et al.  Comparison of DBR with CONWIP in an unbalanced production line with three stations , 2004 .

[8]  Wallace J. Hopp,et al.  Factory physics : foundations of manufacturing management , 1996 .

[9]  J. Jaccard,et al.  LISREL Approaches to Interaction Effects in Multiple Regression , 1998 .

[10]  Phillip S. Mitchell.  Japanese Manufacturing Techniques: Nine Hidden Lessons in Simplicity , 1983 .

[11]  William L. Maxwell,et al.  The Role of Work-in-Process Inventory in Serial Production Lines , 1988, Oper. Res..

[12]  John H. Blackstone,et al.  The evolution of a management philosophy: The theory of constraints , 2007 .

[13]  新郷 重夫,et al.  A revolution in manufacturing : the SMED system , 1985 .

[14]  Marc Lambrecht,et al.  Buffer Stock Allocation in Serial and Assembly Type of Production Lines , 1990 .

[15]  Satya S. Chakravorty,et al.  Does Protective Capacity Assist Managers in Competing Along Time-Based Dimensions? , 1994 .

[16]  Hokey Min,et al.  Selection of management accounting systems in Just-In-Time and Theory of Constraints-based manufacturing , 2003 .

[17]  B. J. Berkley,et al.  A REVIEW OF THE KANBAN PRODUCTION CONTROL RESEARCH LITERATURE , 2009 .

[18]  V. J. Mabin,et al.  The World of the Theory of Constraints: A Review of the International Literature , 1999 .

[19]  H. Popper,et al.  The goal. , 1967, Journal of the Mount Sinai Hospital, New York.

[20]  R. Schonberger.  Japanese manufacturing techniques : nine hidden lessons simplicity , 1982 .

[21]  Barbara B. Flynn,et al.  Relationship Between JIT and TQM: Practices and Performance , 1995 .