The Structure of Creative Design: What Problem Maps Can Tell Us About Problem Formulation and Creative Designers

Problem formulation is an important part of the design process that has been largely underexplored. Similarly, the relationship between how designers formulate problems and creative outcome is not well understood. To shed light on what the process of problem formulation can tell us about creativity in design, we use the problem map model ‐ a flexible, domainindependent ontology for modeling the design formulation process ‐ to analyze protocols from eight expert designers. In this paper, we discuss the effectiveness of using problem maps for coding design protocols and what the problem map model can tell us about the protocols of designers. In this exploratory study, we use the problem map model to code and analyze the problem formulation stage of the design process.

[1]  Renate Eisentraut.  Styles of problem solving and their influence on the design process , 1999 .

[2]  Nigel Cross,et al.  Analysing design activity , 1996 .

[3]  Nigel Cross,et al.  Creativity in the design process: co-evolution of problem–solution , 2001 .

[4]  John S. Gero,et al.  An approach to the analysis of design protocols , 1998 .

[5]  John S. Gero,et al.  The Situated Function - Behaviour - Structure Framework , 2002, AID.

[6]  Rivka Oxman,et al.  Think-maps: teaching design thinking in design education , 2004 .

[7]  B. Chandrasekaran,et al.  Function in Device Representation , 2000, Engineering with Computers.

[8]  Alberto J. Cañas,et al.  Florida Institute for Human and Machine Cognition (IHMC) , 2011 .

[9]  S Harfield,et al.  On design ‘problematization’: Theorising differences in designed outcomes , 2007 .

[10]  Elliot Soloway,et al.  A model of software design , 1986, Int. J. Intell. Syst..

[11]  Steven M. Smith,et al.  Metrics for measuring ideation effectiveness , 2003 .

[12]  Wolfgang Beitz,et al.  Engineering Design: A Systematic Approach , 1984 .

[13]  John A. Barnden,et al.  Semantic Networks , 1998, Encyclopedia of Social Network Analysis and Mining.

[14]  Raymond Y. K. Lau,et al.  Predicting problem-solving performance with concept maps: An information-theoretic approach , 2010, Decis. Support Syst..

[15]  John S. Gero,et al.  A function–behavior–structure ontology of processes , 2007, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing.

[16]  B. Chandrasekaran,et al.  Functional representation: A brief historical perspective , 1994, Appl. Artif. Intell..

[17]  John S. Gero,et al.  Locating Creativity in a Framework of Designing for Innovation , 2007, IFIP CAI.

[18]  Jami J. Shah,et al.  Applied Tests of Design Skills—Part 1: Divergent Thinking , 2012 .

[19]  John S. Gero,et al.  Design Prototypes: A Knowledge Representation Schema for Design , 1990, AI Mag..

[20]  Morteza Pourmohamadi,et al.  LINKOGRAPHER: AN ANALYSIS TOOL TO STUDY DESIGN PROTOCOLS BASED ON FBS CODING SCHEME , 2011 .

[21]  Alberto J. Cañas,et al.  A TEORIA SUBJACENTE AOS MAPAS CONCEITUAIS E COMO ELABORÁ-LOS E USÁ-LOS * THE THEORY UNDERLYING CONCEPT MAPS AND HOW TO CONSTRUCT AND USE THEM , 2010 .

[22]  P. Langley,et al.  A structure for representing problem formulation in design , 2011 .

[23]  Thomas G. Dietterich,et al.  A model of the mechanical design process based on empirical data , 1988, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing.

[24]  Robert L. Glass.  The Loyal Opposition - On Design , 1999, IEEE Software.

[25]  Nigel Cross,et al.  Research in design Thinking , 1992 .

[26]  Gerd Fricke,et al.  Successful approaches in dealing with differently precise design problems , 1999 .

[27]  H. Chertkow,et al.  Semantic memory , 2002, Current neurology and neuroscience reports.

[28]  Ashok K. Goel,et al.  Structure, behavior, and function of complex systems: The structure, behavior, and function modeling language , 2008, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing.

[29]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  The Structure of Ill Structured Problems , 1973, Artif. Intell..

[30]  K. A. Ericsson,et al.  Protocol Analysis: Verbal Reports as Data , 1984 .