Effect of masker modulation depth on speech masking release
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Emily Buss,et al. Effect of amplitude modulation coherence for masked speech signals filtered into narrow bands. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[2] S. Bacon,et al. The effects of hearing loss and noise masking on the masking release for speech in temporally complex backgrounds. , 1998, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.
[3] M. Cooke,et al. Consonant identification in N-talker babble is a nonmonotonic function of N. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[4] J M Festen,et al. Limited resolution of spectral contrast and hearing loss for speech in noise. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[5] Fan-Gang Zeng,et al. Speech recognition with amplitude and frequency modulations. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[6] Martin Cooke,et al. A glimpsing model of speech perception in noise. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[7] R. Plomp,et al. The Reception Threshold of Interrupted Speech for Hearing-Impaired Listeners , 1983 .
[8] B. Moore,et al. Benefits of linear amplification and multichannel compression for speech comprehension in backgrounds with spectral and temporal dips. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[9] Hideki Kawahara,et al. YIN, a fundamental frequency estimator for speech and music. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[10] S P Bacon,et al. Modulation detection, modulation masking, and speech understanding in noise in the elderly. , 1992, Journal of speech and hearing research.
[11] R Plomp,et al. Effect of multiple speechlike maskers on binaural speech recognition in normal and impaired hearing. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[12] Michael K. Qin,et al. Effects of simulated cochlear-implant processing on speech reception in fluctuating maskers. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[13] Peggy B Nelson,et al. Factors affecting speech understanding in gated interference: cochlear implant users and normal-hearing listeners. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[14] Frédéric Berthommier,et al. Masking release for consonant features in temporally fluctuating background noise , 2006, Hearing Research.
[15] Thomas Baer,et al. Speech reception thresholds in noise with and without spectral and temporal dips for hearing‐impaired and normally hearing people , 1997 .
[16] R. Drullman. Temporal envelope and fine structure cues for speech intelligibility , 1994 .
[17] Brian C J Moore,et al. Speech perception problems of the hearing impaired reflect inability to use temporal fine structure , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[18] Frédéric Berthommier,et al. Effects of envelope expansion on speech recognition , 1999, Hearing Research.
[19] B C Moore,et al. Factors affecting thresholds for sinusoidal signals in narrow-band maskers with fluctuating envelopes. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[20] R. Fay,et al. Speech Processing in the Auditory System , 2010, Springer Handbook of Auditory Research.
[21] S. Rosen,et al. Uncomodulated glimpsing in "checkerboard" noise. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[22] Paul J. Abbas. Auditory-nerve fiber responses to tones in a noise masker , 1981, Hearing Research.
[23] H. Gustafsson,et al. Masking of speech by amplitude-modulated noise. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[24] Fan-Gang Zeng,et al. Contribution of frequency modulation to speech recognition in noise. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[25] Christian Lorenzi,et al. Speech masking release in listeners with flat hearing loss: Effects of masker fluctuation rate on identification scores and phonetic feature reception , 2006, International journal of audiology.
[26] R V Shannon,et al. Speech Recognition with Primarily Temporal Cues , 1995, Science.
[27] Michelle R. Molis,et al. Speech recognition in fluctuating and continuous maskers: effects of hearing loss and presentation level. , 2004, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.
[28] Q Summerfield,et al. The contribution of waveform interactions to the perception of concurrent vowels. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[29] Peggy B Nelson,et al. Understanding speech in modulated interference: cochlear implant users and normal-hearing listeners. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[30] K. S. Rhebergen,et al. A Speech Intelligibility Index-based approach to predict the speech reception threshold for sentences in fluctuating noise for normal-hearing listeners. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[31] G. A. Miller,et al. The Intelligibility of Interrupted Speech , 1948 .
[32] B C Moore,et al. Effects of spectral smearing on the intelligibility of sentences in the presence of interfering speech. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[33] Emily Buss,et al. Spectral integration of synchronous and asynchronous cues to consonant identification. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[34] Stuart Rosen,et al. THE PERCEPTION OF SPEECH IN FLUCTUATING NOISE , 1993 .
[35] C D Geisler,et al. Auditory nerve fiber response to wide-band noise and tone combinations. , 1978, Journal of neurophysiology.
[36] T. Houtgast,et al. Factors affecting masking release for speech in modulated noise for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[37] B J Kwon,et al. Consonant identification under maskers with sinusoidal modulation: masking release or modulation interference? , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[38] K. S. Rhebergen,et al. Extended speech intelligibility index for the prediction of the speech reception threshold in fluctuating noise. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[39] G. A. Miller,et al. Erratum: An Analysis of Perceptual Confusions Among Some English Consonants [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 27, 339 (1955)] , 1955 .
[40] J. Culling,et al. Perceptual and computational separation of simultaneous vowels: cues arising from low-frequency beating. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[41] Jayne B Ahlstrom,et al. Benefit of modulated maskers for speech recognition by younger and older adults with normal hearing. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[42] Christian Lorenzi,et al. The ability of listeners to use recovered envelope cues from speech fine structure. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[43] G. A. Miller,et al. An Analysis of Perceptual Confusions Among Some English Consonants , 1955 .
[44] A. Duquesnoy. Effect of a single interfering noise or speech source upon the binaural sentence intelligibility of aged persons. , 1983, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[45] R. Klinke,et al. HEARING — Physiological Bases and Psychophysics , 1983, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
[46] R. Plomp,et al. Effects of fluctuating noise and interfering speech on the speech-reception threshold for impaired and normal hearing. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[47] R. Plomp,et al. Effect of spectral envelope smearing on speech reception. II. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.