Site characterization by seismic noise in Istanbul, Turkey

Single station seismic noise measurements were carried out at 192 sites in the western part of Istanbul, Turkey. This extensive survey allowed the fundamental resonance frequency of the sedimentary cover to be mapped, and identify areas prone to site amplification. The results are in good agreement with the geological distribution of sedimentary units, indicating a progressive decrease of the fundamental resonance frequencies from the northeastern part, where the bedrock outcrops, towards the southwestern side, where a thickness of some hundreds meters for the sedimentary cover is estimated. The particular distribution of fundamental resonance frequencies indicates that local amplification of the ground motion might play a significative role in explaining the anomalous damage distribution after the 17 August 1999 Kocaeli Earthquake. Furthermore, 2D array measurements of seismic noise were performed in the metropolitan area with the aim of obtaining a preliminary geophysical characterization of the different sedimentary covers. These measurements allow the estimation of the shear-wave velocity profile for some representative areas and the identification of the presence of strong impedance contrast responsible of seismic ground motion amplification. Comparison of a theoretical site response from an estimated S-wave velocity profile with an empirical one based on earthquake recordings strongly encourages the use of the low cost seismic noise techniques for the study of seismic site effects.

[1]  M. Erdik,et al.  Earthquake risk assessment for Istanbul metropolitan area , 2003 .

[2]  Marco Mucciarelli,et al.  Comparison of Empirical and Numerical Site Responses at the Tito Test Site, Southern Italy , 2007 .

[3]  Dario Albarello,et al.  Statistical Analysis of Noise Horizontal-to-Vertical Spectral Ratios (HVSR) , 2005 .

[4]  M. Erdik,et al.  Two-dimensional nonlinear site response analysis of Adapazarı plain and predictions inferred from aftershocks of the Kocaeli earthquake of 17 August 1999 , 2004 .

[5]  Dario Albarello,et al.  Combining genetic and linearized algorithms for a two-step joint inversion of Rayleigh wave dispersion and H/V spectral ratio curves , 2007 .

[6]  Semih S. Tezcan,et al.  Seismic amplification at Avcılar, Istanbul , 2002 .

[7]  S. Parolai,et al.  Rayleigh wave dispersion curves from seismological and engineering geotechnical methods: a comparison at the Bornheim test site (Germany) , 2007 .

[8]  M. Ohori,et al.  A Comparison of ESAC and FK Methods of Estimating Phase Velocity Using Arbitrarily Shaped Microtremor Arrays , 2002 .

[9]  Keiiti Aki,et al.  Space and Time Spectra of Stationary Stochastic Waves, with Special Reference to Microtremors , 1957 .

[10]  M. Ergin,et al.  Site amplification at Avcılar, Istanbul , 2004 .

[11]  Stefano Parolai,et al.  Joint inversion of phase velocity dispersion and H/V ratio curves from seismic noise recordings using a genetic algorithm, considering higher modes , 2005 .

[12]  Joint Inversion of Receiver Functions and Surface-Wave Dispersion for Crustal Structure , 2000 .

[13]  Hiroaki Yamanaka,et al.  Application of genetic algorithms to an inversion of surface-wave dispersion data , 1996, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[14]  S. Dalgıç,et al.  Factors affecting the greater damage in the Avcılar area of Istanbul during the 17 August 1999 Izmit earthquake , 2004 .

[15]  Rongjiang Wang,et al.  A simple orthonormalization method for stable and efficient computation of Green's functions , 1999, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[16]  Kohji Tokimatsu,et al.  Effects of Multiple Modes on Rayleigh Wave Dispersion Characteristics , 1992 .

[17]  Walter H. F. Smith,et al.  Free software helps map and display data , 1991 .

[18]  Y Nakamura,et al.  A METHOD FOR DYNAMIC CHARACTERISTICS ESTIMATION OF SUBSURFACE USING MICROTREMOR ON THE GROUND SURFACE , 1989 .

[19]  Dino Bindi,et al.  Suitability of Short-Period Sensors for Retrieving Reliable H/V Peaks for Frequencies Less Than 1 Hz , 2008 .

[20]  S. Parolai,et al.  S-wave Velocity Profiles for Earthquake Engineering Purposes for the Cologne Area (Germany) , 2006 .

[21]  G. Grünthal European Macroseismic Scale 1998 , 1998 .

[22]  Charles S. Mueller,et al.  Earthquake Damage, Site Response, and Building Response in Avcilar, West of Istanbul, Turkey , 2000 .

[23]  Maria Rosaria Gallipoli,et al.  Comparison between VS30 and other estimates of site amplification in Italy , 2006 .

[24]  D. Albarello,et al.  QUICK ESTIMATES OF SOFT SEDIMENT THICKNESSES FROM AMBIENT NOISE HORIZONTAL TO VERTICAL SPECTRAL RATIOS: A CASE STUDY IN SOUTHERN ITALY , 2004 .

[26]  Peter Bormann,et al.  ASSESSMENT OF THE NATURAL FREQUENCY OF THE SEDIMENTARY COVER IN THE COLOGNE AREA (GERMANY) USING NOISE MEASUREMENTS , 2001 .

[27]  J. Peterson,et al.  Observations and modeling of seismic background noise , 1993 .

[28]  A. Strollo,et al.  On the suitability of 1 s geophone for ambient noise measurements in the 0.1–20Hz frequency range: experimental outcomes , 2008 .

[29]  Jonathan P. Stewart,et al.  Amplification Factors for Spectral Acceleration in Tectonically Active Regions , 2003 .

[30]  Masanori Horike,et al.  INVERSION OF PHASE VELOCITY OF LONG-PERIOD MICROTREMORS TO THE S-WAVE-VELOCITY STRUCTURE DOWN TO THE BASEMENT IN URBANIZED AREAS , 1985 .

[31]  J. Capon High-resolution frequency-wavenumber spectrum analysis , 1969 .

[32]  Maria Rosaria Gallipoli,et al.  Analysis and Modeling of hvsr in the Presence of a Velocity Inversion: The Case of Venosa, Italy , 2005 .

[33]  M. Erdik,et al.  Site Characterization and Site Amplification for a Seismic Microzonation Study in Turkey , 2004 .

[34]  N. N. Ambraseys,et al.  Long‐term seismicity of Istanbul and of the Marmara Sea region , 1991 .

[35]  Kohji Tokimatsu,et al.  S-Wave Velocity Profiling by Joint Inversion of Microtremor Dispersion Curve and Horizontal-to-Vertical (H/V) Spectrum , 2005 .

[36]  Kuvvet Atakan,et al.  Local site effects in Ataköy, Istanbul, Turkey, due to a future large earthquake in the Marmara Sea , 2006 .

[37]  Seismic demands and analysis of site effects in the Marmara region during the 1999 Kocaeli earthquake , 2007 .

[38]  N. Theodulidis,et al.  Empirical evaluation of microtremor H/V spectral ratio , 2008 .

[39]  Kohji Tokimatsu,et al.  S-Wave Velocity Profiling by Inversion of Microtremor H/V Spectrum , 2004 .

[40]  Jim Mori,et al.  Evaluation of Methods for Estimating Linear Site-Response Amplifications in the Los Angeles Region , 2000 .

[41]  D. Bindi,et al.  Comparison of Different Site Response Estimation Techniques Using Aftershocks of the 1999 Izmit Earthquake , 2004 .

[42]  Donat Fäh,et al.  A theoretical investigation of average H/V ratios , 2001 .

[43]  Frank Scherbaum,et al.  Determination of shallow shear wave velocity profiles in the Cologne, Germany area using ambient vibrations , 2003 .

[44]  Mustafa Erdik,et al.  Site-Specific Issues for Strong Ground Motions during the Kocaeli, Turkey, Earthquake of 17 August 1999, as Inferred from Array Observations of Microtremors and Aftershocks , 2002 .