Periodic Event-Triggered Quantization Policy Design for a Scalar LTI System With i.i.d. Feedback Dropouts

This technical note proposes an event-triggered quantization policy design method to stabilize a scalar continuous-time linear time-invariant (LTI) system, whose feedback loop is closed over an unreliable digital communication network. The feedback packets suffer from network delay and may be dropped in an independent and identically distributed (i.i.d.) way. In order to save quantization bit rate, we implement a periodic event-triggering strategy which periodically samples the state and only quantizes and transmits the sampled state when a predefined event is triggered. By making good use of both the information bits and the sampling time instants of the feedback packets, our policy can obtain the desired mean-square stability at a lower bit rate than the conventional time-triggered quantization policies which utilize only the information bits inside the feedback packets. Under our quantization policy, the stabilizing bit rate condition is up to the dropout rate, the processing and network delays and the unstable eigenvalue of the system, and is independent of the bounded process noise.

[1]  J. Lunze,et al.  Event-based control using quantized state information , 2010 .

[2]  Manuel Mazo,et al.  Asynchronous decentralized event-triggered control , 2012, Autom..

[3]  Qiang Ling Bit-Rate Conditions to Stabilize a Continuous-Time Linear System With Feedback Dropouts , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[4]  Anant Sahai,et al.  The Necessity and Sufficiency of Anytime Capacity for Stabilization of a Linear System Over a Noisy Communication Link—Part I: Scalar Systems , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[5]  Jorge Cortés,et al.  Event-Triggered Stabilization of Linear Systems Under Bounded Bit Rates , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[6]  Eduardo Sontag,et al.  New characterizations of input-to-state stability , 1996, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[7]  Massimo Franceschetti,et al.  Data Rate Theorem for Stabilization Over Time-Varying Feedback Channels , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[8]  João P. Hespanha,et al.  Control With Minimal Cost-Per-Symbol Encoding and Quasi-Optimality of Event-Based Encoders , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[9]  Andrey V. Savkin,et al.  Comments on "Control over noisy channels" and relevant negative results , 2005, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[10]  Robin J. Evans,et al.  Stabilizability of Stochastic Linear Systems with Finite Feedback Data Rates , 2004, SIAM J. Control. Optim..

[11]  Massimo Franceschetti,et al.  The value of timing information in event-triggered control: The scalar case , 2016, 2016 54th Annual Allerton Conference on Communication, Control, and Computing (Allerton).

[12]  Eloy García,et al.  Model-Based Event-Triggered Control for Systems With Quantization and Time-Varying Network Delays , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[13]  J.H. Braslavsky,et al.  Level Crossing Sampling in Feedback Stabilization under Data-Rate Constraints , 2006, Proceedings of the 45th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[14]  Qiang Ling,et al.  A Necessary and Sufficient Feedback Dropout Condition to Stabilize Quantized Linear Control Systems With Bounded Noise , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[15]  Sekhar Tatikonda,et al.  Control over noisy channels , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[16]  Qiang Ling Stabilizing bit rate conditions for a scalar continuous time linear system with bounded processing delay and bounded process noise , 2016, 2016 IEEE 55th Conference on Decision and Control (CDC).

[17]  Paulo Tabuada,et al.  Event-Triggered Real-Time Scheduling of Stabilizing Control Tasks , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[18]  Lihua Xie,et al.  Minimum Data Rate for Mean Square Stabilization of Discrete LTI Systems Over Lossy Channels , 2010, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[19]  Sekhar Tatikonda,et al.  Control under communication constraints , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[20]  Munther A. Dahleh,et al.  Feedback stabilization of uncertain systems in the presence of a direct link , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[21]  João Pedro Hespanha,et al.  A Survey of Recent Results in Networked Control Systems , 2007, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[22]  Panos J. Antsaklis,et al.  Control and Communication Challenges in Networked Real-Time Systems , 2007, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[23]  W. P. M. H. Heemels,et al.  Model-based periodic event-triggered control for linear systems , 2013, Autom..

[24]  Qiang Ling,et al.  Bit Rate Conditions to Stabilize a Continuous-Time Scalar Linear System Based on Event Triggering , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[25]  Xiaofeng Wang,et al.  Efficiently Attentive Event-Triggered Systems With Limited Bandwidth , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[26]  Daniel Liberzon,et al.  On stabilization of linear systems with limited information , 2003, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[27]  K. Åström,et al.  Comparison of Riemann and Lebesgue sampling for first order stochastic systems , 2002, Proceedings of the 41st IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, 2002..

[28]  Robin J. Evans,et al.  Feedback Control Under Data Rate Constraints: An Overview , 2007, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[29]  Daniel Liberzon,et al.  Quantized feedback stabilization of linear systems , 2000, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[30]  Xiaofeng Wang,et al.  Self-Triggered Feedback Control Systems With Finite-Gain ${\cal L}_{2}$ Stability , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.