Evaluating the strategic behavior of cement producers: An equilibrium problem with equilibrium constraints

Abstract This paper investigates the equilibria reached by a number of strategic producers in the cement sector through a technological representation of the market. We present a bilevel model for each producer that characterizes its profit maximizing behavior. In the bilevel model, the upper-level problem of each producer is constrained by a lower-level market clearing problem representing cement trading and whose objective function corresponds to social welfare. Replacing the lower level problem by its optimality condition yields a Mathematical Program with Equilibrium Constraints (MPEC). Then, all strategic producers are jointly considered. Representing their interaction requires solving jointly the interrelated MPECs of all producers, which results in an Equilibrium Problem with Equilibrium Constraints (EPEC). A parametric analysis concerning cost, capacity and demand fluctuations has been conducted. Our analysis shows that the European cement sector is mature and has lost its competitiveness; African cement market can assume a prominent role in international markets in the coming future if investments in new and efficient capacity are carried out. Finally, the Far East will remain the reference exporter of cement at worldwide level.

[1]  Philippe Quirion,et al.  Changing the Allocation Rules in the EU ETS: Impact on Competitiveness and Economic Efficiency , 2008 .

[2]  Bethany L. Nicholson,et al.  Mathematical Programs with Equilibrium Constraints , 2021, Pyomo — Optimization Modeling in Python.

[3]  A. J. Conejo,et al.  Equilibria in an Oligopolistic Electricity Pool With Stepwise Offer Curves , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[4]  F.D. Galiana,et al.  A mixed-integer LP procedure for the analysis of electric grid security under disruptive threat , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[5]  Daniel Huppmann,et al.  National-Strategic Investment in European Power Transmission Capacity , 2014, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[6]  Andreas Fischer,et al.  On generalized Nash games and variational inequalities , 2007, Oper. Res. Lett..

[7]  José Fortuny-Amat,et al.  A Representation and Economic Interpretation of a Two-Level Programming Problem , 1981 .

[8]  P. Harker Generalized Nash games and quasi-variational inequalities , 1991 .

[9]  Guy Meunier,et al.  Capacity Decisions with Demand Fluctuations and Carbon Leakage , 2014, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[10]  Elisabetta Allevi,et al.  The steel industry: A mathematical model under environmental regulations , 2015, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[11]  Marcel Boyer,et al.  Economic Analysis of the European Cement Industry , 2013 .

[12]  C. Hepburn,et al.  The impact of CO2 emissions trading on firm profits and market prices , 2006 .

[13]  Francisco Facchinei,et al.  Generalized Nash Equilibrium Problems , 2010, Ann. Oper. Res..

[14]  B. Hobbs,et al.  Complementarity Modeling in Energy Markets , 2012 .

[15]  Jean-Pierre Ponssard,et al.  Carbon Control and Competitiveness Post 2020: The Cement Report. FINAL REPORT, February 2014 , 2014 .

[16]  Sven Leyffer,et al.  Solving multi-leader–common-follower games , 2010, Optim. Methods Softw..

[17]  J. Ponssard,et al.  EU emissions trading and the cement sector: a spatial competition analysis , 2008 .

[18]  Masao Fukushima,et al.  Quasi-variational inequalities, generalized Nash equilibria, and multi-leader-follower games , 2009, Comput. Manag. Sci..