Sensitivity and noise in GC-MS: Achieving low limits of detection for difficult analytes

Abstract Gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS) instrument limit of detection (LOD) is typically listed by major vendors as that of octafluoronaphthalene (OFN). Most current GC–MS instruments can achieve LODs in the low femtogram range. However, GC–MS LODs for realistic analytes in actual samples are often a few orders of magnitude higher than OFN's. Users seldom encounter 1 pg LOD in the single ion monitoring mode in their applications. We define this detectability difference as the “OFN gap.” In this paper, we demonstrate and discuss how the OFN gap can be significantly reduced by the use of GC–MS with supersonic molecular beams (SMB). Experimental results were obtained with a recently developed GC–MS with SMB named 1200-SMB, that is based on the conversion of the Varian 1200 system into a GC–MS–MS with SMB. With this 1200-SMB system, the LOD of all types of analytes, including OFN, in real samples is significantly improved through the combination of: (a) enhanced molecular ion; (b) elimination of vacuum background noise; (c) elimination of mass independent noise; (d) elimination of ion source peak tailing and degradation; (e) significantly increased range of thermally labile and low volatility compounds that are amenable for analysis through lower sample elution temperatures; (f) reduced column bleed and ghost peaks through sample elution at lower temperatures; (g) improved compatibility with large volume injections; and (h) reduced matrix interferences through the combination of enhanced molecular ion and MS–MS. As a result, the 1200-SMB LODs of common and/or difficult compounds are much closer to its OFN LOD, even in complex matrices. We crossed the 400 for methomyl, and >2000 for C 32 H 66 . In general, the harder the compound analysis, the greater is the gain in sample detectability using the 1200-SMB versus traditional GC–MS. Thus, the 1200-SMB lowers LOD, particularly for difficult analytes that are normally sacrificed in methods, and the detectability gains can amount to a few orders of magnitude over traditional GC–MS in real-world applications.

[1]  K. Grob,et al.  Vaporising systems for large volume injection or on-line transfer into gas chromatography: Classification, critical remarks and suggestions , 1996 .

[2]  P. Worsfold,et al.  Selectivity and detectability optimizations in HPLC , 1989 .

[3]  W. Engewald,et al.  Methods for, and applications of, large-volume injection in capillary gas chromatography , 2002 .

[4]  S. Lehotay Analysis of pesticide residues in mixed fruit and vegetable extracts by direct sample introduction/gas chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry. , 2000, Journal of AOAC International.

[5]  A. Amirav,et al.  Cluster chemical ionization for improved confidence level in sample identification by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry. , 2003, Rapid communications in mass spectrometry : RCM.

[6]  T. Cajka,et al.  Gas chromatography-high-resolution time-of-flight mass spectrometry in pesticide residue analysis: advantages and limitations. , 2004, Journal of chromatography. A.

[7]  S. Dagan,et al.  Fast, high temperature and thermolabile GC—MS in supersonic molecular beams , 1994 .

[8]  H L Pardue,et al.  The inseparable triad: analytical sensitivity, measurement uncertainty, and quantitative resolution. , 1997, Clinical chemistry.

[9]  S. Stein,et al.  Establishing the fitness for purpose of mass spectrometric methods , 2003, Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry.

[10]  John B. Phillips,et al.  Comprehensive Two-Dimensional Gas Chromatography using an On-Column Thermal Modulator Interface , 1991 .

[11]  P. Magni,et al.  Concurrent solvent recondensation large sample volume splitless injection , 2003 .

[12]  Roger Ekins,et al.  Point On the meaning of “sensitivity” , 1997 .

[13]  A. Gordin,et al.  Supersonic gas chromatography/mass spectrometry. , 2001, Rapid communications in mass spectrometry : RCM.

[14]  Steven J Lehotay,et al.  Fast and easy multiresidue method employing acetonitrile extraction/partitioning and "dispersive solid-phase extraction" for the determination of pesticide residues in produce. , 2003, Journal of AOAC International.

[15]  A. Amirav,et al.  Electron impact mass spectrometry in supersonic molecular beams , 1990 .

[16]  S. Dagan,et al.  Megabore versus Microbore as the Optimal Column for Fast Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry , 1998 .

[17]  A. Amirav Electron impact and hyperthermal surface ionization mass spectrometry in supersonic molecular beams , 1991 .

[18]  K. Grob Split and Splitless Injection for Quantitative Gas Chromatography: Concepts, Processes, Practical Guidelines, Sources of Error , 2001 .

[19]  S. Dagan,et al.  Cluster chemical ionization and deuterium exchange mass spectrometry in supersonic molecular Beams , 1996, Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry.

[20]  J. Fillion,et al.  Multiresidue method for the determination of residues of 251 pesticides in fruits and vegetables by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry and liquid chromatography with fluorescence detection. , 2000, Journal of AOAC International.

[21]  A. Gordin,et al.  Extending the range of compounds amenable for gas chromatography-mass spectrometric analysis. , 2003, Journal of chromatography. A.

[22]  R. Fussell,et al.  Evaluation of gas chromatography-tandem quadrupole mass spectrometry for the determination of organochlorine pesticides in fats and oils. , 2005, Journal of chromatography. A.

[23]  A. Gordin,et al.  Fast, high-sensitivity, multipesticide analysis of complex mixtures with supersonic gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. , 2002, Journal of chromatography. A.

[24]  A. Amirav,et al.  Identification of novel synthetic organic compounds with supersonic gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. , 2004, Journal of chromatography. A.

[25]  A. Gordin,et al.  Improved electron ionization ion source for the detection of supersonic molecular beams , 2002 .

[26]  Steven J Lehotay,et al.  Use of buffering and other means to improve results of problematic pesticides in a fast and easy method for residue analysis of fruits and vegetables. , 2005, Journal of AOAC International.

[27]  U. Brinkman,et al.  Comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography: a powerful and versatile analytical tool. , 2003, Journal of chromatography. A.

[28]  T. Cajka,et al.  Evaluation of two-dimensional gas chromatography-time-of-flight mass spectrometry for the determination of multiple pesticide residues in fruit. , 2003, Journal of chromatography. A.

[29]  L. B. Jones,et al.  A new type of GC–MS with advanced capabilities , 2006 .

[30]  S. Dagan,et al.  Fast, very fast, and ultra-fast gas chromatography-mass spectrometry of thermally labile steroids, carbamates, and drugs in supersonic molecular beams , 1996, Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry.

[31]  J. Hajšlová,et al.  Optimization and evaluation of low-pressure gas chromatography-mass spectrometry for the fast analysis of multiple pesticide residues in a food commodity. , 2001, Journal of chromatography. A.

[32]  S. Lehotay,et al.  Evaluation of two fast and easy methods for pesticide residue analysis in fatty food matrixes. , 2005, Journal of AOAC International.

[33]  N. Nibbering,et al.  The effect of temperature on photoionisation mass spectra , 1986 .

[34]  W. Chupka Effect of Thermal Energy on Ionization Efficiency Curves of Fragment Ions , 1971 .

[35]  S. Dagan,et al.  Electron impact mass spectrometry of alkanes in supersonic molecular beams , 1995, Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry.

[36]  M. Galceran,et al.  Modern developments in gas chromatography-mass spectrometry-based environmental analysis. , 2003, Journal of chromatography. A.