Human SNPs reveal no evidence of frequent positive selection.

We compared the single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in humans in 182 housekeeping and 148 tissue-specific genes. SNPs were divided into rare and common polymorphisms based on their frequencies. We found that housekeeping genes tend to be less polymorphic than tissue-specific genes for both rare and common SNPs. Using mouse as a second species for computing sequence divergences, we found no evidence of positive selection: for both housekeeping and tissue-specific genes, the ratio of nonsynonymous to synonymous common SNPs per site showed no significant difference from that of divergence. Similarly, we observed no evidence of positive selection for the 289 and 149 genes that have orthologs available for divergence calculation between humans and chimpanzees and between humans and Old World monkeys, respectively. A comparison with previous SNP studies suggests that approximately 20% of the nonsynonymous SNPs in the human population are nearly neutral and that positive selection in the human genome might not be as frequent as previously thought.

[1]  Masatoshi Nei,et al.  Evolution of genes and proteins. , 1983 .

[2]  Pui-Yan Kwok,et al.  Sequence variations in the public human genome data reflect a bottlenecked population history , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[3]  Richard Judson,et al.  Genome-wide evaluation of the public SNP databases. , 2003, Pharmacogenomics.

[4]  E. Levanon,et al.  Human housekeeping genes are compact. , 2003, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[5]  S. Gabriel,et al.  Quality and completeness of SNP databases , 2003, Nature Genetics.

[6]  A. Orth,et al.  Large-scale analysis of the human and mouse transcriptomes , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[7]  M. Kimura,et al.  The neutral theory of molecular evolution. , 1983, Scientific American.

[8]  Alexei J Drummond,et al.  Time dependency of molecular rate estimates and systematic overestimation of recent divergence times. , 2005, Molecular biology and evolution.

[9]  Pui-Yan Kwok,et al.  Single-nucleotide polymorphisms in the public domain: how useful are they? , 2001, Nature Genetics.

[10]  L. Duret,et al.  Determinants of substitution rates in mammalian genes: expression pattern affects selection intensity but not mutation rate. , 2000, Molecular biology and evolution.

[11]  Justin C. Fay,et al.  Positive and negative selection on the human genome. , 2001, Genetics.

[12]  E. Lander,et al.  Characterization of single-nucleotide polymorphisms in coding regions of human genes , 1999 .

[13]  Wen-Hsiung Li,et al.  Mammalian housekeeping genes evolve more slowly than tissue-specific genes. , 2004, Molecular biology and evolution.

[14]  K. Holsinger The neutral theory of molecular evolution , 2004 .

[15]  Eric S. Lander,et al.  An SNP map of the human genome generated by reduced representation shotgun sequencing , 2000, Nature.

[16]  K. Hastings Strong evolutionary conservation of broadly expressed protein isoforms in the troponin I gene family and other vertebrate gene families , 1996, Journal of Molecular Evolution.

[17]  Ziheng Yang,et al.  PAML: a program package for phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood , 1997, Comput. Appl. Biosci..

[18]  Georgii A. Bazykin,et al.  Positive selection at sites of multiple amino acid replacements since rat–mouse divergence , 2004, Nature.

[19]  M. Kreitman,et al.  Adaptive protein evolution at the Adh locus in Drosophila , 1991, Nature.

[20]  A. Templeton,et al.  Contingency tests of neutrality using intra/interspecific gene trees: the rejection of neutrality for the evolution of the mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase II gene in the hominoid primates. , 1996, Genetics.

[21]  N. Shen,et al.  Patterns of single-nucleotide polymorphisms in candidate genes for blood-pressure homeostasis , 1999, Nature Genetics.

[22]  D. Lipman,et al.  Improved tools for biological sequence comparison. , 1988, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[23]  D. Hartl,et al.  Population genetics of polymorphism and divergence. , 1992, Genetics.