Changes in the methodology of medical teaching due to the COVID-19 pandemic

ABSTRACT Objective To evaluate the perceptions of students and teachers regarding remote teaching modality in comparison with the traditional face-to-face method. Methods In this observational, retrospective, comparative, single-center study, questionnaires containing three major assessment domains were sent to two groups: university professors and undergraduate and graduate students. The first domain collected demographic and general data on the platforms used. The second and third domains contained questions that compared the perception of the quality of information offered by the two systems. Results Between May and September 2020, 162 students and 71 teachers participated in the study. A greater proportion of students demonstrated previous contact with the online method, while professors had presented a greater number of courses. Most participants reported that their expectations regarding the remote teaching method were met (students, 80.3%; teachers, 94.4%). A significant number of students (83.3%) and teachers (88.7%) rated the classes as easier to attend and manage. Despite difficulties, such as concentration retention, most of the participants agree (at least partially) that the format should be maintained. Conclusion The remote teaching methodology, although still incipient in Brazil, has become a reality in light of current health restrictions. Our study demonstrated a high level of overall satisfaction and a high sense of learning from both students and faculty. However, new challenges associated with this system have been identified, such as retention of attention and interference from the external environment. Longitudinal comparative studies that incorporate various aspects of medical education in all cycles are necessary to corroborate the findings of this study. Design Retrospective comparative study, level III evidence.

[1]  Sarah Rose Fitzgerald,et al.  Twelve tips for teaching medical students online under COVID-19 , 2020, Medical education online.

[2]  D. Araújo,et al.  Student Evaluation of Distance Learning for Health Care Professionals. , 2019, Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association.

[3]  F. Scheele,et al.  Development of an Instructional Design Evaluation Survey for Postgraduate Medical E-Learning: Content Validation Study , 2019, Journal of Medical Internet Research.

[4]  R. Bajpai,et al.  Health Professions’ Digital Education: Review of Learning Theories in Randomized Controlled Trials by the Digital Health Education Collaboration , 2019, Journal of medical Internet research.

[5]  Leisi Pei,et al.  Does online learning work better than offline learning in undergraduate medical education? A systematic review and meta-analysis , 2019, Medical education online.

[6]  I. El Sayed,et al.  A cross-sectional study to assess Evidence-Based Medicine teaching method: online or face-to-face? , 2018, BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine.

[7]  P. McDonald,et al.  Comparing student outcomes in traditional vs intensive, online graduate programs in health professional education , 2018, BMC Medical Education.

[8]  Elisa Rocha,et al.  Neural Basis of Learning , 2018 .

[9]  L. DeRuisseau The flipped classroom allows for more class time devoted to critical thinking. , 2016, Advances in physiology education.

[10]  Elizabeth A Gazza,et al.  Using student satisfaction data to evaluate a new online accelerated nursing education program. , 2016, Evaluation and program planning.

[11]  M. A. Ferreira,et al.  What Are We Looking for in Computer-Based Learning Interventions in Medical Education? A Systematic Review , 2016, Journal of medical Internet research.

[12]  Jeffrey R. Raker,et al.  Improved Student Learning through a Faculty Learning Community: How Faculty Collaboration Transformed a Large-Enrollment Course from Lecture to Student Centered , 2016, CBE life sciences education.

[13]  Antonio Gugliotta,et al.  Delivery of a urology online course using moodle versus didactic lectures methods , 2015, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[14]  C. Senior,et al.  Learning in friendship groups: developing students’ conceptual understanding through social interaction , 2014, Front. Psychol..

[15]  Barbara Lom,et al.  Classroom Activities: Simple Strategies to Incorporate Student-Centered Activities within Undergraduate Science Lectures , 2012, Journal of undergraduate neuroscience education : JUNE : a publication of FUN, Faculty for Undergraduate Neuroscience.

[16]  Edwin M Robertson,et al.  New Insights in Human Memory Interference and Consolidation , 2012, Current Biology.

[17]  Slava Kalyuga Cognitive Load Theory: How Many Types of Load Does It Really Need? , 2011 .

[18]  D. Cook,et al.  Instructional Design Variations in Internet-Based Learning for Health Professions Education: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis , 2010, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[19]  Kadriye O. Lewis,et al.  Teaching medical professionals online: A cross-discipline experience , 2010, Medical teacher.

[20]  Vimla L. Patel,et al.  Cognitive and learning sciences in biomedical and health instructional design: A review with lessons for biomedical informatics education , 2009, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[21]  D. Cook,et al.  Internet-based learning in the health professions: a meta-analysis. , 2008, JAMA.

[22]  H. Thompson,et al.  Health science students and their learning environment: a comparison of perceptions of on-site, remote-site, and traditional classroom students. , 2008, Perspectives in health information management.

[23]  Judi Harris,et al.  What Is Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge , 2009 .

[24]  M. Orkin Motivating Students , 2008 .