Geochemical and metallogenic provinces: a discussion initiated by results from geochemical mapping across northern Fennoscandia

Abstract The concept of metallogenic province has won general acceptance in economic geology. It is agreed that metallogenic provinces offer good opportunities for exploration of new ore deposits. The concept of geochemical province is also established, but its exact meaning is disputable. In this paper, geochemical province is used as an abnormal spatial distribution of an element or element combination in a particular sample type as measured by a particular analytical technique. The practical consequences of this concept of geochemical provinces in mineral exploration seem not to have been fully utilized, although geochemical and metallogenic provinces could only be different manifestations of the same regional features. The location of geochemical provinces should be of greater importance in exploration than the location of metallogenic provinces, simply because a geochemical province can be identified early in an exploration program, while a metallogenic province cannot be defined until a number of ore discoveries has already been made. We have compared metallogenic provinces with geochemical provinces obtained by regional geochemical mapping in Fennoscandia (mainly data from the Nordkalott Project) and other places such as England, Wales, Germany and Alaska in order to study to what degree large-scale geochemical dispersion patterns can be associated with clusters of economically interesting mineral deposits. It is concluded that metallogenic provinces lie within or coincide with a number of geochemical provinces, some of which may have causal relationships with the ore deposits. It can be assumed that an enormous hierarchy of large and small geochemical provinces exist at the earth's surface. The main features of this system would be detectable by worldwide low-density geochemical mapping. Such mapping should be performed in order to shorten the time lapse between possible rises in the demand of certain raw materials and their supply. Worldwide geochemical mapping would also contribute to a better understanding of major geochemical processes of the Earth and provide baselines for environmental research.

[1]  G. Gaál,et al.  Structure and composition of the Precambrian crust along the POLAR Profile in the northern Baltic Shield , 1989 .

[2]  A. A. Beus,et al.  Geochemical exploration methods for mineral deposits , 1977 .

[3]  O. Selinus,et al.  Biogeochemical studies of plants from stream banks in Northern Sweden , 1987 .

[4]  A. A. Levinson INTRODUCTION TO EXPLORATION GEOCHEMISTRY , 1974 .

[5]  G. Govett,et al.  Applications of rock geochemistry to productive plutons and volcanic sequences , 1988 .

[6]  E. M. Cameron,et al.  Distribution of Uranium in the crust of the northwestern canadian shield as shown by lake-sediment analysis , 1973 .

[7]  R. Zilliacus,et al.  Neutron activation analysis of geochemical samples , 1983 .

[8]  B. Lehmann Metallogeny of tin; magmatic differentiation versus geochemical heritage , 1982 .

[9]  A. Kahma The main sulphide ore belt of Finland between Lake Ladoga and the Bothnian Bay , 1978 .

[10]  A. Steenfelt Geochemical patterns related to major tectono-stratigraphic units in the Precambrian of northern Scandinavia and Greenland , 1990 .

[11]  M. Ødegård The use of inductively coupled argon plasma (ICAP) atomic emission spectroscopy in the analysis of stream sediments , 1981 .

[12]  Raymond E. Smith,et al.  The implications to exploration of chalcophile corridors in the Archaean Yilgarn Block, Western Australia, as revealed by laterite geochemistry , 1989 .

[13]  M. Hale,et al.  Developments in regional geochemistry for mineral exploration , 1988 .

[14]  R. Ottesen,et al.  Overbank sediment: a representative sample medium for regional geochemical mapping , 1989 .

[15]  I. Nichol,et al.  Regional geochemical reconnaissance and the location of metallogenic provinces , 1970 .

[16]  N. Gustavsson,et al.  Visualization of geochemical data on maps: New options , 1987 .

[17]  S. Hoffman Regional Geochemical Atlas, Great Glen , 1990 .

[18]  D. Rickard,et al.  Studies on the genesis of the Laisvall sandstone lead-zinc deposit, Sweden , 1979 .

[19]  G. C. Amstutz,et al.  Studies on the genesis of the Laisvall sandstone lead-zinc deposit, Sweden; discussion , 1981 .

[20]  Warren J. Nokleberg,et al.  Significant metalliferous lode deposits and placer districts of Alaska , 1987 .

[21]  N. Gustavsson,et al.  Geochemical Atlas of Finland: preliminary aspects , 1989 .

[22]  G. Gaál 2200 million years of crustal evolution: The Baltic Shield , 1986 .

[23]  J. Bergström,et al.  Regional prospecting for ores based on heavy minerals in glacial till , 1977 .

[24]  M. Logsdon,et al.  Halogens in Apatites from the Providencia Area, Mexico , 1974 .

[25]  H. E. Hawkes,et al.  Geochemistry in Mineral Exploration , 1962 .

[26]  C. E. Nelson,et al.  Proterozoic origins of uranium mineralization in the Colorado Front Range , 1982 .

[27]  R. I. Thorpe,et al.  The source of lead in the Osen sandstone lead deposit on the Baltic Shield, Norway , 1982 .

[28]  R. V. Alstine Continental rifts and lineaments associated with major fluorspar districts , 1976 .

[29]  G. J. S. Govett,et al.  Rock geochemistry in mineral exploration , 1983 .

[30]  J. Munoz,et al.  Chloride-hydroxyl exchange in biotite and estimation of relative HCl/HF activities in hydrothermal fluids , 1981 .