An economic analysis of wireless network infrastructure sharing

Internet service providers (ISPs) struggle to invest in upgrading their networks to catch up with growing mobile data demand, while users have to face significant data overage fees. Pooling ISPs' network infrastructures can potentially enable better user experience and lower prices. For example, Google recently launched a cross-carrier MVNO (mobile virtual network operator) data plan called Project Fi, where users' devices can automatically access either of two partner cellular networks or any available open WiFi network. We consider the economic impact of cross-carrier MVNOs on the mobile data market. We begin by analyzing a network selection strategy that optimizes cross-carrier users' costs. We then study ISPs' behavior, deriving the prices that partner ISPs charge the cross-carrier MVNO and that the cross-carrier MVNO charges its end users. Although the cross-carrier MVNO may lose money from selling data, it can offset this loss with side revenue, e.g., advertisement revenue when users consume more content. We derive conditions under which the cross-carrier MVNO achieves a profit and its users reduce their costs. Finally, we use a real-world network quality dataset to simulate users' network selection behavior and demonstrate the benefits of the ISP competition brought by the cross-carrier MVNO.

[1]  Mung Chiang,et al.  RAT selection games in HetNets , 2013, 2013 Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM.

[2]  Chi Sun,et al.  A Constrained MDP-Based Vertical Handoff Decision Algorithm for 4G Wireless Networks , 2008, ICC 2008.

[3]  Rui Zhang,et al.  User-Initiated Data Plan Trading via a Personal Hotspot Market , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[4]  Sangtae Ha,et al.  Offering Supplementary Network Technologies: Adoption Behavior and Offloading Benefits , 2015, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking.

[5]  J. Walrand,et al.  WiFi access point pricing as a dynamic game , 2006, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking.

[6]  Yung Yi,et al.  Economics of WiFi offloading: Trading delay for cellular capacity , 2013, 2013 Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM.

[7]  Sangtae Ha,et al.  Sponsoring mobile data: An economic analysis of the impact on users and content providers , 2015, 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Communications (INFOCOM).

[8]  Liang Zheng,et al.  Economic viability of a virtual ISP , 2017, IEEE INFOCOM 2017 - IEEE Conference on Computer Communications.

[9]  Shaolei Ren,et al.  Entry and Spectrum Sharing Scheme Selection in Femtocell Communications Markets , 2013, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking.

[10]  Mung Chiang,et al.  A Survey of Client-Controlled HetNets for 5G , 2017, IEEE Access.

[11]  R. Srikant,et al.  Economics of Network Pricing With Multiple ISPs , 2006, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking.

[12]  Ted Taekyoung Kwon,et al.  AMUSE: Empowering users for cost-aware offloading with throughput-delay tradeoffs , 2013, 2013 Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM.

[13]  陈耕艺 无线网络新兵:Project Fi , 2015 .

[14]  Harish Viswanathan,et al.  A practical traffic management system for integrated LTE-WiFi networks , 2014, MobiCom.

[15]  Sangtae Ha,et al.  Secondary markets for mobile data: Feasibility and benefits of traded data plans , 2015, 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Communications (INFOCOM).

[16]  Leandros Tassiulas,et al.  An iterative double auction for mobile data offloading , 2013, 2013 11th International Symposium and Workshops on Modeling and Optimization in Mobile, Ad Hoc and Wireless Networks (WiOpt).