Towards Opportunistic Data Dissemination in Mobile Phone Sensor Networks

Recently, there has been a growing interest within the research community in developing opportunistic routing protocols. Many schemes have been proposed; however, they differ greatly in assumptions and in type of network for which they are evaluated. As a result, researchers have an ambiguous understanding of how these schemes compare against each other in their specific applications. To investigate the performance of existing opportunistic routing algorithms in realistic scenarios, we propose a heterogeneous architecture including fixed infrastructure, mobile infrastructure, and mobile nodes. The proposed architecture focuses on how to utilize the available, low cost short-range radios of mobile phones for data gathering and dissemination. We also propose a new realistic mobility model and metrics. Existing opportunistic routing protocols are simulated and evaluated with the proposed heterogeneous architecture, mobility models, and transmission interfaces. Results show that some protocols suffer long time-to-live (TTL), while others suffer short TTL. We show that heterogeneous sensor network architectures need heterogeneous routing algorithms, such as a combination of Epidemic and Spray and Wait.

[1]  Ian F. Akyildiz,et al.  Sensor Networks , 2002, Encyclopedia of GIS.

[2]  Rabin K. Patra,et al.  Routing in a delay tolerant network , 2004, SIGCOMM '04.

[3]  T. Spyropoulos,et al.  Multiple-copy Routing in Intermittently Connected Mobile Networks , 2004 .

[4]  Cauligi S. Raghavendra,et al.  Spray and wait: an efficient routing scheme for intermittently connected mobile networks , 2005, WDTN '05.

[5]  Pan Hui,et al.  Impact of Human Mobility on the Design of Opportunistic Forwarding Algorithms , 2006, Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM 2006. 25TH IEEE International Conference on Computer Communications.

[6]  Hongyi Wu,et al.  Delay/Fault-Tolerant Mobile Sensor Network (DFT-MSN): A New Paradigm for Pervasive Information Gathering , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing.

[7]  Flavio Fabbri,et al.  DR.11.1: State of the art of research on opportunistic networks, and definition of a common framework for reference models and performance metrics , 2008 .

[8]  Jörg Ott,et al.  Working day movement model , 2008, MobilityModels '08.

[9]  Amin Vahdat,et al.  Epidemic Routing for Partially-Connected Ad Hoc Networks , 2009 .

[10]  Jörg Ott,et al.  The ONE simulator for DTN protocol evaluation , 2009, SIMUTools 2009.

[11]  Arta Dilo,et al.  A fault-tolerant data dissemination based on Honeycomb Architecture for Mobile Multi-Sink wireless sensor networks , 2010, 2010 Sixth International Conference on Intelligent Sensors, Sensor Networks and Information Processing.

[12]  Christian Bonnet,et al.  Propagation of Public Safety Warning Messages: A Delay Tolerant Network Approach , 2010, 2010 IEEE Wireless Communication and Networking Conference.

[13]  Jörg Ott,et al.  Simulating Mobility and DTNs with the ONE (Invited Paper) , 2010, J. Commun..

[14]  J. Ott,et al.  Simulating Mobility and DTNs with the ONE , 2010 .

[15]  Nirvana Meratnia,et al.  A directional data dissemination protocol for vehicular environments , 2011, Comput. Commun..

[16]  Chin-Tser Huang,et al.  Look-Ahead Routing and Message Scheduling in Delay-Tolerant Networks , 2011, Comput. Commun..

[17]  Anders Lindgren,et al.  Probabilistic Routing Protocol for Intermittently Connected Networks , 2012, RFC.