Precipitation-filtering technology for uranium waste solution generated on washing-electrokinetic decontamination

Abstract Large volumes of uranium waste solution are generated during the operation of washing-electrokinetic decontamination equipment used to remove uranium from radioactive soil. A treatment technology for uranium waste solution generated upon washing-electrokinetic decontamination for soil contaminated with uranium has been developed. The results of laboratory-size precipitation experiments were as follows. The total amount of metal precipitation by NaOH for waste solution was highest at pH 11. Ca(II), K(I), and Al(III) ions in the supernatant partially remained after precipitation, whereas the concentration of uranium in the supernatant was below 0.2 ppm. Also, when NaOH was used as a precipitant, the majority of the K(I) ions in the treated solution remained. The problem of CaO is to need a long dissolution time in the precipitation tank, while Ca(OH) 2 can save a dissolution time. However, the volume of the waste solution generated when using Ca(OH) 2 increased by 8 mL/100 mL (waste solution) compared to that generated when using CaO. NaOH precipitant required lower an injection volume lower than that required for Ca(OH) 2 or CaO. When CaO was used as a precipitant, the uranium radioactivity in the treated solution at pH 11 reached its lowest value, compared to values of uranium radioactivity at pH 9 and pH 5. Also, the uranium radioactivity in the treated solution upon injection of 0.2 g of alum with CaO or Ca(OH) 2 was lower than that upon injection of 0.4 g of alum. The results of industrial scale precipitation experiments were as follows. When NaOH was injected as a precipitant, the uranium radioactivity in the treated solution was the lowest of the three precipitants, and the dried sludge volume was the smallest. However, when the treated solution was recycled as a washing solution or electrolyte, K(I) ions can be accumulated in the treated solution. When Ca(OH) 2 was injected as a precipitant, the volume of the generated waste solution was found to increase. After drying for 24 h, the volume of sludge was reduced to 35% of the initial sludge volume. Meanwhile, a recycling process diagram for the volume reduction of waste solution generated from soil washing and electrokinetic decontamination was developed through experiments.

[1]  Y. Fujii,et al.  Ion Exchange Separation for Decontamination of Centrifuge Enrichment Plant , 2002 .

[2]  T. Morimoto,et al.  Determination of uranium in water samples by ICP-AES with chelating resin disk preconcentration. , 2000 .

[3]  S. Badawy,et al.  URANIUM ISOTOPE ENRICHMENT BY COMPLEXATION WITH CHELATING POLYMER ADSORBENT , 2003 .

[4]  Baohua Gu,et al.  Sorption and binary exchange of nitrate, sulfate, and uranium on an anion-exchange resin. , 2004, Environmental science & technology.

[5]  Jizhong Zhou,et al.  Sequestering uranium and technetium through co-precipitation with aluminum in a contaminated acidic environment. , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[6]  T. Todd,et al.  Crossflow filtration testing of INEEL radioactive and non-radioactive waste slurries , 2000 .

[7]  Wen-Hui Wang,et al.  Effect of pH, ionic strength and humic acid on the sorption of uranium(VI) to attapulgite. , 2009, Applied radiation and isotopes : including data, instrumentation and methods for use in agriculture, industry and medicine.

[8]  D. Watson,et al.  In situ bioreduction of technetium and uranium in a nitrate-contaminated aquifer. , 2004, Environmental science & technology.

[9]  W. Cooper,et al.  An alternate process for the recovery of uranium by ion exchange: A study of the HIMIX process , 1986 .

[10]  W. P. Ball,et al.  Influence of calcite and dissolved calcium on uranium(VI) sorption to a hanford subsurface sediment. , 2005, Environmental science & technology.

[11]  A. Makishima,et al.  Separation of thorium and uranium from silicate rock samples using two commercial extraction chromatographic resins. , 1999, Analytical chemistry.

[12]  M. Shamsipur,et al.  A Rapid Method for the Extraction and Separation of Uranium from Thorium and Other Accompanying Elements Using Octadecyl Silica Membrane Disks Modified by Tri-n-octyl Phosphine Oxide , 2000 .

[13]  Kitae Baek,et al.  Electrokinetic Restoration of Sulfate-Accumulated Saline Greenhouse Soil , 2011 .

[14]  L. Couston,et al.  Speciation of Uranyl Species in Nitric Acid Medium by Time-Resolved Laser-Induced Fluorescence , 1995 .

[15]  Shunitz Tanaka,et al.  Effect of addition of glucose on micellar electrokinetic capillary chromatography with sodium dodecyl sulphate , 1992 .

[16]  G. Longworth,et al.  Determination of uranium and thorium in geological materials using extraction chromatography , 1999 .

[17]  P. Zhou,et al.  Extraction of oxidized and reduced forms of uranium from contaminated soils: effects of carbonate concentration and pH. , 2005, Environmental science & technology.

[18]  S. Brooks,et al.  Geochemical reactions and dynamics during titration of a contaminated groundwater with high uranium, aluminum, and calcium , 2003 .

[19]  S. Badawy,et al.  Chelating polymer granules prepared by radiation‐induced homopolymerization. I—Kinetic study of radiation polymerization process , 2000 .

[20]  R. Saini,et al.  Reaction between U(IV) and H2O2 in hydrochloric acid medium , 1982 .

[21]  O. Alhassanieh,et al.  Separation of Th, U, Pa, Ra and Ac from natural uranium and thorium series , 1999 .

[22]  S. Badawy,et al.  Cross-Linked Polyacrylonitrile Prepared by Radiation-Induced Polymerization Technique , 2003 .

[23]  D. Langmuir,et al.  Uranium solution-mineral equilibria at low temperatures with applications to sedimentary ore deposits , 1978 .

[24]  George M. Murray,et al.  Molecularly imprinted ion exchange resin for purification, preconcentration and determination of UO22+by spectrophotometry and plasma spectrometry , 1999 .

[25]  C. Tondre,et al.  Time-Resolved Laser-Induced Fluorescence as a Unique Tool for Low-Level Uranium Speciation , 1998 .