Microstructure noise, realized volatility, and optimal sampling

Recorded prices are known to diverge from their "efficient" values due to the presence of market microstructure contaminations. The microstructure noise creates a dichotomy in the model-free estimation of integrated volatility. While it is theoretically necessary to sum squared returns that are computed over very small intervals to better identify the underlying quadratic variation over a period, the summing of numerous contaminated return data entails substantial accumulation of noise. Using asymptotic arguments as in the extant theoretical literature on the subject, we argue that the realized volatility estimator diverges to infinity almost surely when noise plays a role. While realized volatility cannot be a consistent estimate of the quadratic variation of the log price process, we show that a standardized version of the realized volatility estimator can be employed to uncover the second moment of the (unobserved) noise process. More generally, we show that straightforward sample moments of the noisy return data provide consistent estimates of the moments of the noise process. Finally, we quantify the finite sample bias/variance trade-off that is induced by the accumulation of noisy observations and provide clear and easily implementable directions for optimally sampling contaminated high frequency return data for the purpose of volatility estimation

[1]  M. Osborne,et al.  Market Making and Reversal on the Stock Exchange , 1966 .

[2]  Portfolio theory, 25 years after : essays in honor of Harry Markowitz , 1979 .

[3]  Ruth J. Williams,et al.  Introduction to Stochastic Integration , 1994 .

[4]  Jonathan D. Cryer,et al.  Time Series Analysis , 1986 .

[5]  M. Yor,et al.  Continuous martingales and Brownian motion , 1990 .

[6]  A. Lo,et al.  THE ECONOMETRICS OF FINANCIAL MARKETS , 1996, Macroeconomic Dynamics.

[7]  Ananth N. Madhavan Market Microstructure: A Survey , 2000 .

[8]  Francis X. Diebold,et al.  Modeling and Forecasting Realized Volatility , 2001 .

[9]  N. Shephard,et al.  Non‐Gaussian Ornstein–Uhlenbeck‐based models and some of their uses in financial economics , 2001 .

[10]  F. Diebold,et al.  The Distribution of Realized Exchange Rate Volatility , 2000 .

[11]  F. Diebold,et al.  The distribution of realized stock return volatility , 2001 .

[12]  A. Ohanissian Using Temporal Aggregation to Distinguish between True and Spurious Long Memory , 2001 .

[13]  N. Meddahi,et al.  A theoretical comparison between integrated and realized volatility , 2002 .

[14]  N. Shephard,et al.  Econometric analysis of realized volatility and its use in estimating stochastic volatility models , 2002 .

[15]  Roel C. A. Oomen,et al.  Statistical Models for High Frequency Security Prices , 2002 .

[16]  N. Shephard,et al.  Econometric Analysis of Realized Covariation: High Frequency Based Covariance, Regression, and Correlation in Financial Economics , 2004 .

[17]  Yacine Ait-Sahalia,et al.  How Often to Sample a Continuous-Time Process in the Presence of Market Microstructure Noise , 2003 .

[18]  J. Powell,et al.  How accurate is the asymptotic approximation to the distribution of realised variance ? , 2003 .

[19]  Benoit Perron,et al.  Long Memory and the Relation between Implied and Realized Volatility , 2006 .

[20]  Torben G. Andersen,et al.  Correcting the errors: Volatility forecast evaluation using high-frequency data and realized volatilities , 2005 .