AN EMPIRICAL STUDY OF KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER IN WORKING RELATIONSHIPS WITH SUPPLIERS IN NEW PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT

This study examines the factors (trust, communication, supplier relationship specific adaptations, supplier flexibility, and relationship history) that influence knowledge transfer from the supplier to the customer firm in new product development, and the impact of knowledge transfer on product development performance. It also suggests that knowledge tacitness moderates these relationships. Based on a sample of 186 US firms, this study finds that trust, communication, supplier relationship specific adaptations, and supplier flexibility influence knowledge transfer. Knowledge transfer, in turn, has an effect on new product development performance. Mixed findings have also been reported in this paper with respect to the moderating effects of knowledge tacitness. Trust, supplier flexibility, and relationship history are more important for tacit knowledge transfer than for explicit knowledge. Knowledge tacitness does not moderate the relationship between knowledge transfer and NPD performance. However, the results show that both tacit and explicit knowledge transfer significantly affects NPD performance.

[1]  I. Nonaka,et al.  The Knowledge Creating Company , 2008 .

[2]  Gary L. Ragatz,et al.  TIMING AND EXTENT OF SUPPLIER INTEGRATION IN NEW PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT: A CONTINGENCY APPROACH , 2008 .

[3]  James C. Anderson,et al.  Some Methods for Respecifying Measurement Models to Obtain Unidimensional Construct Measurement , 1982 .

[4]  J. Covin,et al.  Knowledge Acquisition in University–Industry Alliances: An Empirical Investigation from a Learning Theory Perspective* , 2008 .

[5]  Michael Song,et al.  The role of suppliers in market intelligence gathering for radical and incremental innovation , 2009 .

[6]  Matthew C. H. Yeung,et al.  Is Guanxi (relationship) a bridge to knowledge transfer , 2006 .

[7]  G. Hult,et al.  Knowledge as a strategic resource in supply chains , 2006 .

[8]  J. Barney.  Strategic Factor Markets: Expectations, Luck, and Business Strategy , 1986 .

[9]  Gregory N. Stock,et al.  Creating Dynamic Capability: The Role of Intertemporal Integration, Knowledge Retention, and Interpretation , 2006 .

[10]  R. Calantone,et al.  The Impact of Market Knowledge Competence on New Product Advantage: Conceptualization and Empirical Examination , 1998 .

[11]  David W. Gerbing,et al.  An Updated Paradigm for Scale Development Incorporating Unidimensionality and Its Assessment , 1988 .

[12]  A. Joshi,et al.  Continuous Supplier Performance Improvement: Effects of Collaborative Communication and Control , 2009 .

[13]  Jan B. Heide,et al.  Controlling Supplier Opportunism in Industrial Relationships , 1996 .

[14]  Andrew C. Inkpen,et al.  Knowledge Management Processes and International Joint Ventures , 1998 .

[15]  A. Joshi,et al.  Customer Knowledge Development: Antecedents and Impact on New Product Performance , 2004 .

[16]  X. Martin,et al.  Knowledge transfer capacity and its implications for the theory of the multinational corporation , 2003 .

[17]  Rupak Rauniar,et al.  Organizational Integration for Product Development: The Effects on Glitches, On-Time Execution of Engineering Change Orders, and Market Success , 2010, Decis. Sci..

[18]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  Product development performance : strategy, organization, and management in the world auto industry / Kim B. Clark, Tahahiro Fujimoto , 1991 .

[19]  Shankar Ganesan.  Determinants of Long-Term Orientation in Buyer-Seller Relationships , 1994 .

[20]  I. Nonaka.  A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation , 1994 .

[21]  William H. A. Johnson.  ASSESSING ORGANIZATIONAL KNOWLEDGE CREATION THEORY IN COLLABORATIVE R&D PROJECTS , 2002 .

[22]  F. Dwyer,et al.  An Examination of Organizational Factors Influencing New Product Success in Internal and Alliance-Based Processes , 2000 .

[23]  R. Morgan,et al.  The moderating effect of organizational cohesiveness in knowledge use and new product development , 2006 .

[24]  Ronald Mascitelli.  From Experience: Harnessing Tacit Knowledge to Achieve Breakthrough Innovation , 2000 .

[25]  J. Hair.  Multivariate data analysis , 1972 .

[26]  R. Handfield,et al.  Supplier integration into new product development: coordinating product, process and supply chain design , 2005 .

[27]  Jakki J. Mohr,et al.  Collaborative Communication in Interfirm Relationships: Moderating Effects of Integration and Control , 1996 .

[28]  Richard G. Netemeyer,et al.  Assessing the Cross-National Applicability of Consumer Behavior Models: A Model of Attitude toward Advertising in General , 1993 .

[29]  James C. Anderson.  Relationships in business markets: Exchange episodes, value creation, and their empirical assessment , 1995 .

[30]  William E. Souder,et al.  New Product Development Performance and the Interaction of Cross‐Functional Integration and Knowledge Management , 2005 .

[31]  W. Starbuck.  Learning by Knowledge-Intensive Firms , 1992 .

[32]  Esther P. Y. Tang,et al.  Effects of supplier and customer integration on product innovation and performance: Empirical evidence in Hong Kong manufacturers , 2010 .

[33]  F. Wynstra,et al.  Managing supplier involvement in new product development: A multiple-case study , 2006 .

[34]  Jeffrey H. Dyer,et al.  The Relational View: Cooperative Strategy and Sources of Interorganizational Competitive Advantage , 1998 .

[35]  T. Das,et al.  Between Trust and Control: Developing Confidence in Partner Cooperation in Alliances , 1998 .

[36]  Shankar Ganesan,et al.  Does Distance Still Matter? Geographic Proximity and New Product Development , 2005 .

[37]  Dail Fields,et al.  Trust and tacit knowledge sharing and use , 2010, J. Knowl. Manag..

[38]  Daniel Z. Levin,et al.  The Strength of Weak Ties You Can Trust: The Mediating Role of Trust in Effective Knowledge Transfer , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[39]  K. Valkokari,et al.  KNOWLEDGE AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT IN CUSTOMER–SUPPLIER RELATIONSHIPS , 2010 .

[40]  Jari Salo,et al.  Applying knowledge management to project marketing in a demanding technology transfer project: Convincing the industrial customer over the knowledge gap , 2009 .

[41]  Barton A. Weitz,et al.  Determinants of Continuity in Conventional Industrial Channel Dyads , 1989 .

[42]  Martin Wetzels,et al.  In chains? An empirical study of antecedents of supplier product development activity in the automotive industry. , 2010 .

[43]  Melissa M. Appleyard,et al.  The Influence of Knowledge Accumulation on Buyer-Supplier Codevelopment Projects , 2003 .

[44]  C. Moorman,et al.  The Acquisition and Utilization of Information in New Product Alliances: A Strength-of-Ties Perspective , 2001 .

[45]  J. H. Dyer,et al.  Creating and managing a high‐performance knowledge‐sharing network: the Toyota case , 2000 .

[46]  R. Handfield,et al.  Involving Suppliers in New Product Development , 1999 .

[47]  Jeffrey H. Dyer,et al.  Using Supplier Networks to Learn Faster , 2004 .

[48]  Brian Squire,et al.  Cooperation and Knowledge Transfer within Buyer–Supplier Relationships: The Moderating Properties of Trust, Relationship Duration and Supplier Performance , 2008 .

[49]  Sabine Kuester,et al.  Determinants of Customer Benefits in Business-to-Business Markets: A Cross-Cultural Comparison , 2005 .

[50]  van Fea Ferrie Echtelt.  New product development : shifting suppliers into gear , 2004 .

[51]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT: PAST RESEARCH, PRESENT FINDINGS, AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS , 1995 .

[52]  J. Liker,et al.  Risky Business or Competitive Power? Supplier Involvement in Japanese Product Design , 1997 .

[53]  Marjorie A. Lyles,et al.  Managing Tacit and Explicit Knowledge Transfer in Ijvs: The Role of Relational Embeddedness and the Impact on Performance , 2004 .

[54]  Joseph P. Cannon,et al.  An Examination of the Nature of Trust in Buyer–Seller Relationships: , 1997 .

[55]  Morten T. Hansen,et al.  The Search-Transfer Problem: The Role of Weak Ties in Sharing Knowledge across Organization Subunits , 1999 .

[56]  Federico Frattini,et al.  New Product Development (Npd) Service Suppliers In Open Innovation Practices: Processes And Organization For Knowledge Exchange And Integration , 2011 .

[57]  Joseph P. Cannon,et al.  Buyer–Supplier Relationships and Customer Firm Costs , 2001 .

[58]  Gilbert A. Churchill.  A Paradigm for Developing Better Measures of Marketing Constructs , 1979 .

[59]  Roger J. Calantone,et al.  Tacit knowledge transfer and firm innovation capability , 2003 .

[60]  O. Williamson.  Comparative Economic Organization: The Analysis of Discrete Structural Alternatives , 1994 .

[61]  Abby Ghobadian,et al.  Knowledge Transfer: The Facilitating Attributes in Supply-Chain Partnerships , 2011, Inf. Syst. Manag..

[62]  Joseph T. Mahoney,et al.  Why firms make unilateral investments specific to other firms: the case of OEM suppliers , 2009 .

[63]  Jan B. Heide,et al.  Relationship Governance in a Supply Chain Network , 2004 .

[64]  Jina Kang,et al.  HOW DO FIRMS SOURCE EXTERNAL KNOWLEDGE FOR INNOVATION? ANALYSING EFFECTS OF DIFFERENT KNOWLEDGE SOURCING METHODS , 2009 .

[65]  Bernard L. Simonin.  Ambiguity and the process of knowledge transfer in strategic alliances , 1999 .

[66]  Gary L. Ragatz,et al.  Benefits associated with supplier integration into new product development under conditions of technology uncertainty , 2002 .

[67]  B. Byrne.  Book Review: Structural Equation Modeling with EQS and EQS/Windows: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming , 1994 .

[68]  Barton A. Weitz,et al.  The Use of Pledges to Build and Sustain Commitment in , 1992 .

[69]  Michael D. Santoro,et al.  Facilitators of Knowledge Transfer in University-Industry Collaborations: A Knowledge-Based Perspective , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[70]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[71]  John R. Nevin,et al.  Performance Outcomes of Purchasing Arrangements in Industrial Buyer-Vendor Relationships , 1990 .

[72]  M. Knudsen.  The Relative Importance of Interfirm Relationships and Knowledge Transfer for New Product Development Success , 2007 .

[73]  Philip H. Birnbaum-More,et al.  The Effect of Multiknowledge Individuals on Performance in Cross‐Functional New Product Development Teams* , 2009 .

[74]  Mohan Subramaniam,et al.  Integrating Cross-Border Knowledge for Transnational New Product Development , 2006 .

[75]  Justin J. P. Jansen,et al.  Inter- and Intra-Organizational Knowledge Transfer: A Meta-Analytic Review and Assessment of its Antecedents and Consequences , 2008 .

[76]  J. H. Davis,et al.  An Integrative Model Of Organizational Trust , 1995 .

[77]  Thomas V. Scannell,et al.  Success Factors for Integrating Suppliers into New Product Development , 1997 .

[78]  Anne S. Miner,et al.  The Impact of Organizational Memory on New Product Performance and Creativity , 1997 .

[79]  S. Hunt,et al.  The Commitment-Trust Theory of Relationship Marketing , 1994 .

[80]  R. Handfield,et al.  Knowledge Sharing in Interorganizational Product Development Teams: The Effect of Formal and Informal Socialization Mechanisms* , 2009 .