The consequences of neural degeneration regarding optimal cochlear implant position in scala tympani: A model approach
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Norbert Dillier,et al. A Simple Two-Component Model of the Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potential in the Human Cochlea , 2000, Audiology and Neurotology.
[2] P. Stypulkowski,et al. Physiological properties of the electrically stimulated auditory nerve. I. Compound action potential recordings , 1984, Hearing Research.
[3] G. M. Clark,et al. Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve: The effect of electrode position on neural excitation , 1993, Hearing Research.
[4] Jeroen J. Briaire,et al. Initial Evaluation of the Clarion CII Cochlear Implant: Speech Perception and Neural Response Imaging , 2002, Ear and hearing.
[5] Summerfield Aq,et al. Preoperative predictors of outcomes from cochlear implantation in adults: performance and quality of life. , 1995 .
[6] W. Parkinson,et al. Residual speech recognition and cochlear implant performance: effects of implantation criteria. , 1999, The American journal of otology.
[7] J. Niparko,et al. Choice of Ear for Cochlear Implantation: The Effect of History and Residual Hearing on Predicted Postoperative Performance , 2003, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.
[8] Wolfgang Gaggl,et al. Electrically Evoked Auditory Brain Stem Responses for Lateral and Medial Placement of the Clarion HiFocus Electrode , 2003, Ear and hearing.
[9] A. Bacciu,et al. The Nucleus Contour Electrode Array: An Electrophysiological Study , 2002, The Laryngoscope.
[10] J. Holsheimer,et al. A model of the electrical behaviour of myelinated sensory nerve fibres based on human data , 1999, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.
[11] F B van der Beek,et al. Clinical Evaluation of the Clarion CII HiFocus 1 with and Without Positioner , 2005, Ear and hearing.
[12] P J Abbas,et al. Multivariate Predictors of Audiological Success with Multichannel Cochlear Implants , 1993, The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology.
[13] R. Cowan,et al. Spatial spread of neural excitation in cochlear implant recipients: comparison of improved ECAP method and psychophysical forward masking , 2003, Hearing Research.
[14] Harold F. Schuknecht,et al. Pathology of the Ear , 1974 .
[15] J. Nadol. Degeneration of cochlear neurons as seen in the spiral ganglion of man , 1990, Hearing Research.
[16] Elaine Saunders,et al. Psychophysics of a prototype peri-modiolar cochlear implant electrode array , 2001, Hearing Research.
[17] J. Firszt,et al. Electrophysiologic Effects of Placing Cochlear Implant Electrodes in a Perimodiolar Position in Young Children , 2004, The Laryngoscope.
[18] J. J. Grote,et al. The Importance of Human Cochlear Anatomy for the Results of Modiolus-Hugging Multichannel Cochlear Implants , 2001, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.
[19] Michael Tykocinski,et al. Threshold, Comfortable Level and Impedance Changes as a Function of Electrode-Modiolar Distance , 2002, Ear and hearing.
[20] Frank Rattay,et al. A model of the electrically excited human cochlear neuron I. Contribution of neural substructures to the generation and propagation of spikes , 2001, Hearing Research.
[21] R. Schoonhoven,et al. Potential distributions and neural excitation patterns in a rotationally symmetric model of the electrically stimulated cochlea , 1995, Hearing Research.
[22] Johan H. M. Frijns,et al. 3D mesh generation to solve the electrical volume conduction problem in the implanted inner ear , 2000, Simul. Pract. Theory.
[23] Johan H. M. Frijns,et al. Unraveling the electrically evoked compound action potential , 2005, Hearing Research.
[24] Marco Pelizzone,et al. Forward masking in different cochlear implant systems. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[25] T Lenarz,et al. A silastic positioner for a modiolus-hugging position of intracochlear electrodes: electrophysiologic effects. , 2000, The American journal of otology.
[26] G M Clark,et al. The Contour Electrode Array: Safety Study and Initial Patient Trials of a New Perimodiolar Design , 2001, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.
[27] J Thomas Roland,et al. Surgical technique for the Nucleus Contour cochlear implant. , 2002, Ear and hearing.
[28] John W. Clark,et al. A distributed-parameter model of the myelinated nerve fiber. , 1991 .
[29] Bruce J. Gantz,et al. Residual Speech Perception and Cochlear Implant Performance in Postlingually Deafened Adults , 2003, Ear and hearing.
[30] Johan H. M. Frijns,et al. Integrated use of volume conduction and neural models to simulate the response to cochlear implants , 2000, Simul. Pract. Theory.
[31] Paul J. Abbas,et al. Intracochlear and extracochlear ECAPs suggest antidromic action potentials , 2004, Hearing Research.
[32] S. Waltzman,et al. Predictors of postoperative performance with cochlear implants. , 1995, The Annals of otology, rhinology & laryngology. Supplement.
[33] J. Frijns,et al. Spatial selectivity in a rotationally symmetric model of the electrically stimulated cochlea , 1996, Hearing Research.