Overcoming the Multiplex Disadvantage by Using Maximum-Likelihood Inversion

A maximum-likelihood estimator, derived under quantum-noise-limited measurement conditions, is used to obtain wavenumber-or-dered spectra produced by a model Michelson interferometer. The estimator is tested on a number of synthetic interferograms, and results are compared to similar spectra obtained by using the Fourier (cosine) transform. It is found that the maximum-likelihood inversion method does not result in white noise in the spectrum estimate when the spectrum is sparse. It thus may be used to circumvent the main disadvantage in multiplexed spectrometer measurements using quantum-noise-limited detectors for emission-based measurements. It is also found that maximum-likelihood inversion methods can be used to obtain spectrum estimates with greater peak-width resolution than those found by using Fourier transforms. The methods produce optical spectrum estimates that are relatively free of artifacts associated with the Fourier transform. The method is extended to include measurements with both quantum noise and additive white noise. Results obtained by using the quantum-noise-limited and normal noise maximum-likelihood spectrum estimation methods suggest that both the multiplex-disadvantage and the Gibbs phenomenon effects may be reduced by limiting the parameter space. The main problem with the maximum-likelihood method is the relatively long times required to obtain spectrum estimates.

[1]  S. Bialkowski,et al.  Analysis of 1st‐Order Rate Constant Spectra With Regularized Least‐Squares and ExpectationMaximization: 1. Theory and Numerical Characterization , 1993 .

[2]  J. Winefordner,et al.  Hadamard spectrometer for ultraviolet-visible spectrometry , 1974 .

[3]  I. Miller Probability, Random Variables, and Stochastic Processes , 1966 .

[4]  L. Shepp,et al.  A Statistical Model for Positron Emission Tomography , 1985 .

[5]  Expectation–maximization algorithm for regression, deconvolution and smoothing of shot‐noise limited data , 1991 .

[6]  T J Holmes,et al.  Richardson-Lucy/maximum likelihood image restoration algorithm for fluorescence microscopy: further testing. , 1989, Applied optics.

[7]  James D. Winefordner,et al.  The Multiplex Disadvantage and Excess Low-Frequency Noise , 1987 .

[8]  Athanasios Papoulis,et al.  Probability, Random Variables and Stochastic Processes , 1965 .

[9]  L. Lucy An iterative technique for the rectification of observed distributions , 1974 .

[10]  Stephen E. Bialkowski Data Analysis in the Shot Noise Limit Part II: Methods for Data Regression , 1989 .

[11]  William H. Richardson,et al.  Bayesian-Based Iterative Method of Image Restoration , 1972 .

[12]  L. Shepp,et al.  Maximum Likelihood Reconstruction for Emission Tomography , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[13]  M.I. Miller,et al.  The role of likelihood and entropy in incomplete-data problems: Applications to estimating point-process intensities and toeplitz constrained covariances , 1987, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[14]  Timothy J. Holmes Maximum-likelihood image restoration adapted for noncoherent optical imaging , 1988 .