The Technology Trap and the Role of Political and Cultural Variables: A Critical Analysis of the E-Government Policies

More than a decade after the first introduction of the e-government policies, early enthusiasms on its immediate benefits on the quality of democracy have undergone critical review. E-government implementation worldwide has proved that technology alone does not necessarily provide more access and more participation. Massive technological intervention is not enough for reinventing government online. Hence, other variables should be taken into consideration. Factors concerning political culture, cognitive frames and mentality, administrative traditions, as well as the country-specific peculiarities play a relevant role in determining if and how e-gov initiatives can succeed or fail. In this article, it will be argued that any opportunity and push for change and actual influence on administrations, governments, and societies, prompted by the new technologies, should endure important variables of political, social, and cultural nature. The political and socio-cultural variables then overcome the technological one and we can state that politics (still) determines (e-)policy. Copyright 2007 by The Policy Studies Organization.

[1]  Richard Rose,et al.  A Global Diffusion Model of e-Governance , 2005, Journal of Public Policy.

[2]  Richard Heeks Most eGovernment-for-Development Projects Fail: How Can Risks be Reduced? , 2003 .

[3]  Richard Rose,et al.  The Internet and Governance in a Global Context , 2005, Journal of Public Policy.

[4]  Perri,et al.  E-governance : styles of political judgement in the information age polity , 2004 .

[5]  Kuno Schedler,et al.  Exploring the Interrelations Between Electronic Government and the New Public Management - A Managerial Framework for Electronic Government , 2001, I3E.

[6]  T. Bovaird E-Government and e-Governance: Organisational Implications, Options and Dilemmas , 2003 .

[7]  Vishanth Weerakkody,et al.  Moving from E-Government to T-Government: A Study of Process Reengineering Challenges in a UK Local Authority Context , 2008, Int. J. Electron. Gov. Res..

[8]  M. Mcluhan Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man , 1964 .

[9]  Katarina Stanoevska-Slabeva,et al.  Towards the E-Society: E-Commerce, E-Business, and E-Government , 2013 .

[10]  Richard Heeks,et al.  eGovernment in Africa: Promise and Practice , 2002, Inf. Polity.

[11]  W. Wong,et al.  Does E‐Government Promote Accountability? A Comparative Analysis of Website Openness and Government Accountability , 2004 .

[12]  Åke Grönlund,et al.  State of the Art in E-Gov Research: Surveying Conference Publications , 2005, Int. J. Electron. Gov. Res..

[13]  J. Organ,et al.  The Coordination of e-Government in Historical Context , 2003 .

[14]  Helle Zinner Henriksen,et al.  The First Leg of E-Government Research: Domains and Application Areas 1998-2003 , 2005, Int. J. Electron. Gov. Res..

[15]  Patrick Dunleavy,et al.  Cultural Barriers to e-government , 2002 .

[16]  Subhash Bhatnagar,et al.  Building blocks of e-government: lessons from developing countries , 2004 .

[17]  Richard Heeks e-Government as a Carrier of Context , 2005, Journal of Public Policy.

[18]  E. Lau Principaux enjeux de l'administration électronique dans les pays membres de l'OCDE , 2004 .