Simplified dynamics model of planar two-joint arm movements.

A theoretical framework is presented that describes a way in which the inverse dynamics equations of motion of planar two-joint arm movements (EX-model) are reformulated in a simple form. A single point was assumed to define both the wrist and elbow joint centers, and thus the motion of two points in extrinsic space was represented by second-order differential equations to provide the variables in the reformulation (RE-) model. Through an analytical processes, it was shown that the RE-model for reproducing the shoulder joint torque consists of the linearly scaled moment per unit mass responsible for accelerating the wrist and elbow points about the shoulder joint, while that for reproducing the elbow joint torque consists of the linearly scaled moment per unit mass responsible for accelerating the wrist point about the elbow. The scaling factors for variables in the RE-model were based solely on the values for segment lengths, while in the EX-model the inertial parameter data for the segments are involved in its representation. The inertial parameter data of six-arm specimens from the cadaver experiment of Chandler et al. (1975, AMRL Technical Report, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, OH) were used to develop and verify the numeric solutions of the RE-model. The adequacy of the model varied somewhat among subjects, but minor changes of the physical parameters of the arm segments enabled perfect reformulation, regardless of the specimens. The potential abilities of the RE-model to deal with the complexities in motor control with more simple control schemes are discussed.

[1]  M Suzuki,et al.  Application of the minimum jerk model to formation of the trajectory of the centre of mass during multijoint limb movements. , 1996, Folia primatologica; international journal of primatology.

[2]  F A Mussa-Ivaldi,et al.  Adaptive representation of dynamics during learning of a motor task , 1994, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[3]  M. Suzuki,et al.  Trajectory formation of the center-of-mass of the arm during reaching movements , 1997, Neuroscience.

[4]  P. Viviani,et al.  Frames of reference and control parameters in visuomanual pointing. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[5]  M. Kawato Optimization and learning in neural networks for formation and control of coordinated movement , 1993 .

[6]  J. Wallace Nygard,et al.  Cerebral circulation prevailing during sleep and hypnosis , 1939 .

[7]  John W. Krakauer,et al.  Independent learning of internal models for kinematic and dynamic control of reaching , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[8]  D. Meyer,et al.  Attention and Performance XIV , 1973 .

[9]  C. E. Clauser,et al.  Weight, volume, and center of mass of segments of the human body , 1969 .

[10]  M. Hoy,et al.  The role of intersegmental dynamics during rapid limb oscillations. , 1986, Journal of biomechanics.

[11]  E. Bizzi,et al.  Human arm trajectory formation. , 1982, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[12]  S. Amari,et al.  Sensori-motor transformations in the brain (with a critique of the tensor theory of cerebellum). , 1985, Journal of theoretical biology.

[13]  John T. McConville,et al.  INVESTIGATION OF INERTIAL PROPERTIES OF THE HUMAN BODY , 1975 .

[14]  A. P. Georgopoulos,et al.  Neuronal population coding of movement direction. , 1986, Science.

[15]  R. Jensen,et al.  Changes in segment inertia proportions between 4 and 20 years. , 1989, Journal of biomechanics.

[16]  R. Jensen,et al.  Body segment mass, radius and radius of gyration proportions of children. , 1986, Journal of biomechanics.

[17]  T. Flash,et al.  The coordination of arm movements: an experimentally confirmed mathematical model , 1985, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.