Stemming the Tide of Light Pollution Encroaching into Marine Protected Areas

Many marine ecosystems are shaped by regimes of natural light guiding the behavior of their constituent species. As evidenced from terrestrial systems, the global introduction of nighttime lighting is likely influencing these behaviors, restructuring marine ecosystems, and compromising the services they provide. Yet the extent to which marine habitats are exposed to artificial light at night is unknown. We quantified nighttime artificial light across the world's network of marine protected areas (MPAs). Artificial light is widespread and increasing in a large percentage of MPAs. While increases are more common among MPAs associated with human activity, artificial light is encroaching into a large proportion of even those marine habitats protected with the strongest legislative designations. Given the current lack of statutory tools, we propose that allocating “Marine Dark Sky Park” status to MPAs will help incentivize responsible authorities to hold back the advance of artificial light.

[1]  G. Thorson.  Light as an ecological factor in the dispersal and settlement of larvae of marine bottom invertebrates , 1964 .

[2]  K. D. Frank,et al.  Impact of outdoor lighting on moths: an assessment , 1988 .

[3]  K. Bjorndal,et al.  Influences of artificial lighting on the seaward orientation of hatchling loggerhead turtles Caretta caretta , 1991 .

[4]  K. Frank.  Impact of Outdoor Lighting on Moths , 1991 .

[5]  C. Mundy,et al.  Role of light intensity and spectral quality in coral settlement: implications for depth-dependent settlement? , 1998 .

[6]  M. Moore,et al.  Urban light pollution alters the diel vertical migration of Daphnia , 2000 .

[7]  E. Naylor.  Marine Animal Behaviour In Relation To Lunar Phase , 2001 .

[8]  Benjamin S. Halpern,et al.  Marine reserves have rapid and lasting effects , 2002 .

[9]  R. Nicholls,et al.  A global analysis of human settlement in coastal zones , 2003 .

[10]  S. Saitoh,et al.  Use of nighttime visible images to detect Japanese common squid Todarodes pacificus fishing areas and potential migration routes in the Sea of Japan , 2004 .

[11]  Travis Longcore,et al.  Ecological light pollution , 2004 .

[12]  J. Tanner.  Seasonality and lunar periodicity in the reproduction of Pocilloporid corals , 1996, Coral Reefs.

[13]  E. H. Erwin,et al.  A global inventory of coral reef stressors based on satellite observed nighttime lights , 2008 .

[14]  Jonathan H. Cohen,et al.  ZOOPLANKTON DIEL VERTICAL MIGRATION — A REVIEW OF PROXIMATE CONTROL , 2009 .

[15]  S. Harris,et al.  Street Lighting Disturbs Commuting Bats , 2009, Current Biology.

[16]  B. Halpern,et al.  Biological Effects Within No-Take Marine Reserves: A global Synthesis , 2009 .

[17]  C. Elvidge,et al.  Development of a 2009 Stable Lights Product using DMSP-OLS data , 2010 .

[18]  Christian Wolter,et al.  Light pollution as a biodiversity threat. , 2010, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[19]  B. Kempenaers,et al.  Artificial Night Lighting Affects Dawn Song, Extra-Pair Siring Success, and Lay Date in Songbirds , 2010, Current Biology.

[20]  J. Granadeiro,et al.  Effects of artificial illumination on the nocturnal foraging of waders , 2010 .

[21]  C. Elvidge,et al.  Limiting the impact of light pollution on human health, environment and stellar visibility. , 2011, Journal of environmental management.

[22]  K. Johansen,et al.  Light-induced bird strikes on vessels in Southwest Greenland. , 2011, Marine pollution bulletin.

[23]  C. Limpus,et al.  Coastal light pollution and marine turtles: assessing the magnitude of the problem , 2012 .

[24]  K. Gaston,et al.  Street lighting changes the composition of invertebrate communities , 2012, Biology Letters.

[25]  Kevin J. Gaston,et al.  REVIEW: Reducing the ecological consequences of night‐time light pollution: options and developments , 2012, The Journal of applied ecology.

[26]  D. Dominoni,et al.  Artificial light at night advances avian reproductive physiology , 2013, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[27]  A. Whitfield,et al.  Potential effects of artificial light associated with anthropogenic infrastructure on the abundance and foraging behaviour of estuary‐associated fishes , 2013 .

[28]  N. Kingston,et al.  World Database on Protected Areas (WDPA) , 2013 .

[29]  J. Lyytimäki.  Nature's nocturnal services: Light pollution as a non-recognised challenge for ecosystem services research and management , 2013 .

[30]  Hugh P. Possingham,et al.  Can satellite-based night lights be used for conservation? The case of nesting sea turtles in the Mediterranean , 2013 .

[31]  Kevin J. Gaston,et al.  The nature, extent, and ecological implications of marine light pollution , 2014 .

[32]  K. Gaston,et al.  Contrasting trends in light pollution across Europe based on satellite observed night time lights , 2014, Scientific Reports.

[33]  Stephen G. Sutton,et al.  Balancing artificial light at night with turtle conservation? Coastal community engagement with light-glow reduction , 2014, Environmental Conservation.

[34]  C. Limpus,et al.  Temporal changes in artificial light exposure of marine turtle nesting areas , 2014, Global change biology.

[35]  C. Voigt,et al.  Artificial light puts ecosystem services of frugivorous bats at risk , 2014 .

[36]  Deidre M. Peroff,et al.  The Sky and Sustainable Tourism Development: A Case Study of a Dark Sky Reserve Implementation in Alqueva , 2015 .

[37]  K. Gaston,et al.  Quantifying the erosion of natural darkness in the global protected area system , 2015, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[38]  S. Jenkins,et al.  Night-time lighting alters the composition of marine epifaunal communities , 2015, Biology Letters.

[39]  Richard Inger,et al.  Worldwide variations in artificial skyglow , 2015, Scientific Reports.