Sculpting the Proteome with AAA+ Proteases and Disassembly Machines

[1]  T. Baker,et al.  Nucleotide-dependent substrate handoff from the SspB adaptor to the AAA+ ClpXP protease. , 2004, Molecular cell.

[2]  A. Matouschek,et al.  An unstructured initiation site is required for efficient proteasome-mediated degradation , 2004, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[3]  Robert T Sauer,et al.  SspB delivery of substrates for ClpXP proteolysis probed by the design of improved degradation tags. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  P. Schultz,et al.  Substrate recognition by the AAA+ chaperone ClpB , 2004, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[5]  Greg L. Hersch,et al.  Communication between ClpX and ClpP during substrate processing and degradation , 2004, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[6]  T. Baker,et al.  Effects of local protein stability and the geometric position of the substrate degradation tag on the efficiency of ClpXP denaturation and degradation. , 2004, Journal of structural biology.

[7]  T. Baker,et al.  Role of the processing pore of the ClpX AAA+ ATPase in the recognition and engagement of specific protein substrates. , 2004, Genes & development.

[8]  Robert T Sauer,et al.  Bivalent tethering of SspB to ClpXP is required for efficient substrate delivery: a protein-design study. , 2004, Molecular cell.

[9]  Samia M. Siddiqui.  Dissecting the steps of substrate processing by the energy-dependent protease ClpXP , 2004 .

[10]  S. Gottesman,et al.  Proteolysis in bacterial regulatory circuits. , 2003, Annual review of cell and developmental biology.

[11]  T. Baker,et al.  Distinct peptide signals in the UmuD and UmuD′ subunits of UmuD/D′ mediate tethering and substrate processing by the ClpXP protease , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  Kenji Takahashi,et al.  Determination of the cleavage sites in SulA, a cell division inhibitor, by the ATP‐dependent HslVU protease from Escherichia coli , 2003, FEBS letters.

[13]  Tania A. Baker,et al.  Linkage between ATP Consumption and Mechanical Unfolding during the Protein Processing Reactions of an AAA+ Degradation Machine , 2003, Cell.

[14]  B. Bukau,et al.  Targeted delivery of an ssrA-tagged substrate by the adaptor protein SspB to its cognate AAA+ protein ClpX. , 2003, Molecular cell.

[15]  T. Baker,et al.  Flexible linkers leash the substrate binding domain of SspB to a peptide module that stabilizes delivery complexes with the AAA+ ClpXP protease. , 2003, Molecular cell.

[16]  T. Baker,et al.  Structure of a delivery protein for an AAA+ protease in complex with a peptide degradation tag. , 2003, Molecular cell.

[17]  M. Eck,et al.  Structural basis of degradation signal recognition by SspB, a specificity-enhancing factor for the ClpXP proteolytic machine. , 2003, Molecular cell.

[18]  T. Baker,et al.  Latent ClpX-recognition signals ensure LexA destruction after DNA damage. , 2003, Genes & development.

[19]  T. Baker,et al.  Mu transpososome architecture ensures that unfolding by ClpX or proteolysis by ClpXP remodels but does not destroy the complex. , 2003, Chemistry & biology.

[20]  T. Baker,et al.  Energy‐dependent degradation: Linkage between ClpX‐catalyzed nucleotide hydrolysis and protein‐substrate processing , 2003, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[21]  T. Baker,et al.  C‐terminal domain mutations in ClpX uncouple substrate binding from an engagement step required for unfolding , 2003, Molecular microbiology.

[22]  C. Gross,et al.  Lack of a robust unfoldase activity confers a unique level of substrate specificity to the universal AAA protease FtsH. , 2003, Molecular cell.

[23]  T. Baker,et al.  Proteomic discovery of cellular substrates of the ClpXP protease reveals five classes of ClpX-recognition signals. , 2003, Molecular cell.

[24]  B. Bukau,et al.  MecA, an adaptor protein necessary for ClpC chaperone activity , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[25]  T. Baker,et al.  Characterization of a specificity factor for an AAA+ ATPase: assembly of SspB dimers with ssrA-tagged proteins and the ClpX hexamer. , 2002, Chemistry & biology.

[26]  J. Kuriyan,et al.  Motors and switches: AAA+ machines within the replisome , 2002, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[27]  A. Steven,et al.  Alternating translocation of protein substrates from both ends of ClpXP protease , 2002, The EMBO journal.

[28]  Kiyoshi Mizuuchi,et al.  ClpAP and ClpXP degrade proteins with tags located in the interior of the primary sequence , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[29]  S. Eom,et al.  The C-terminal Tails of HslU ATPase Act as a Molecular Switch for Activation of HslV Peptidase* , 2002, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[30]  R. Huber,et al.  Functional interactions of HslV (ClpQ) with the ATPase HslU (ClpY) , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[31]  D. Mckay,et al.  Crystal structure of HslUV complexed with a vinyl sulfone inhibitor: corroboration of a proposed mechanism of allosteric activation of HslV by HslU. , 2002, Journal of molecular biology.

[32]  D. Dubnau,et al.  A MecA Paralog, YpbH, Binds ClpC, Affecting both Competence and Sporulation , 2002, Journal of bacteriology.

[33]  A. Horwich,et al.  ClpS, a substrate modulator of the ClpAP machine. , 2002, Molecular cell.

[34]  T. Baker,et al.  Overlapping recognition determinants within the ssrA degradation tag allow modulation of proteolysis , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[35]  T. Baker,et al.  ClpX-mediated remodeling of mu transpososomes: selective unfolding of subunits destabilizes the entire complex. , 2001, Molecular cell.

[36]  T. Baker,et al.  Effects of protein stability and structure on substrate processing by the ClpXP unfolding and degradation machine , 2001, The EMBO journal.

[37]  A. Horwich,et al.  ClpA mediates directional translocation of substrate proteins into the ClpP protease , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[38]  S. Gottesman,et al.  The RssB response regulator directly targets sigma(S) for degradation by ClpXP. , 2001, Genes & development.

[39]  A. Matouschek,et al.  ATP-dependent proteases degrade their substrates by processively unraveling them from the degradation signal. , 2001, Molecular cell.

[40]  T. Baker,et al.  Molecular determinants of complex formation between Clp/Hsp100 ATPases and the ClpP peptidase , 2001, Nature Structural Biology.

[41]  J. Wang,et al.  Crystal structures of the HslVU peptidase-ATPase complex reveal an ATP-dependent proteolysis mechanism. , 2001, Structure.

[42]  B. Sathyanarayana,et al.  Clp ATPases and their role in protein unfolding and degradation. , 2001, Advances in protein chemistry.

[43]  J. Tkach,et al.  Crowbars and ratchets: hsp100 chaperones as tools in reversing protein aggregation. , 2001, Biochemistry and cell biology = Biochimie et biologie cellulaire.

[44]  R. Huber,et al.  Mutational studies on HslU and its docking mode with HslV. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[45]  A. Steven,et al.  Visualization of substrate binding and translocation by the ATP-dependent protease, ClpXP. , 2000, Molecular cell.

[46]  J. Hoskins,et al.  Substrate Recognition by the ClpA Chaperone Component of ClpAP Protease* , 2000, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[47]  Christine B. Trame,et al.  Crystal and Solution Structures of an HslUV Protease–Chaperone Complex , 2000, Cell.

[48]  C. Hill,et al.  Structural basis for the activation of 20S proteasomes by 11S regulators , 2000, Nature.

[49]  R. Woodgate,et al.  Subunit‐specific degradation of the UmuD/D′ heterodimer by the ClpXP protease: the role of trans recognition in UmuD′ stability , 2000, The EMBO journal.

[50]  Alexander Varshavsky,et al.  The ubiquitin system. , 1998, Annual review of biochemistry.

[51]  T. Baker,et al.  A specificity-enhancing factor for the ClpXP degradation machine. , 2000, Science.

[52]  J. Hoskins,et al.  Unfolding and internalization of proteins by the ATP-dependent proteases ClpXP and ClpAP. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[53]  T. Baker,et al.  Dynamics of substrate denaturation and translocation by the ClpXP degradation machine. , 2000, Molecular cell.

[54]  Robert Huber,et al.  The structures of HslU and the ATP-dependent protease HslU–HslV , 2000, Nature.

[55]  A. Horwich,et al.  Global unfolding of a substrate protein by the Hsp100 chaperone ClpA , 1999, Nature.

[56]  C. Georgopoulos,et al.  Recognition, Targeting, and Hydrolysis of the λ O Replication Protein by the ClpP/ClpX Protease* , 1999, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[57]  T. Elliott,et al.  Conditional Stability of the HemA Protein (Glutamyl-tRNA Reductase) Regulates Heme Biosynthesis inSalmonella typhimurium , 1999, Journal of bacteriology.

[58]  E V Koonin,et al.  AAA+: A class of chaperone-like ATPases associated with the assembly, operation, and disassembly of protein complexes. , 1999, Genome research.

[59]  D. Dubnau,et al.  Competence in Bacillus subtilis is controlled by regulated proteolysis of a transcription factor , 1998, The EMBO journal.

[60]  F P Booy,et al.  At sixes and sevens: characterization of the symmetry mismatch of the ClpAP chaperone-assisted protease. , 1998, Journal of structural biology.

[61]  R. Sauer,et al.  The ClpXP and ClpAP proteases degrade proteins with carboxy-terminal peptide tails added by the SsrA-tagging system. , 1998, Genes & development.

[62]  P. Bouloc,et al.  Degradation of carboxy-terminal-tagged cytoplasmic proteins by the Escherichia coli protease HflB (FtsH). , 1998, Genes & development.

[63]  Jimin Wang,et al.  The Structure of ClpP at 2.3 Å Resolution Suggests a Model for ATP-Dependent Proteolysis , 1997, Cell.

[64]  A. Goldberg,et al.  The heat-shock protein HslVU from Escherichia coli is a protein-activated ATPase as well as an ATP-dependent proteinase. , 1997, European journal of biochemistry.

[65]  T. Baker,et al.  ClpX and MuB interact with overlapping regions of Mu transposase: implications for control of the transposition pathway. , 1997, Genes & development.

[66]  R. Huber,et al.  Crystal structure of heat shock locus V (HslV) from Escherichia coli. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[67]  R. Huber,et al.  Structure of 20S proteasome from yeast at 2.4Å resolution , 1997, Nature.

[68]  D. Dubnau,et al.  Biochemical characterization of a molecular switch involving the heat shock protein ClpC, which controls the activity of ComK, the competence transcription factor of Bacillus subtilis. , 1997, Genes & development.

[69]  J. Seol,et al.  Poly-L-lysine activates both peptide and ATP hydrolysis by the ATP-dependent HslVU protease in Escherichia coli. , 1996, Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications - BBRC.

[70]  S. Lindquist,et al.  HSP100/Clp proteins: a common mechanism explains diverse functions. , 1996, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[71]  R. Sauer,et al.  Role of a Peptide Tagging System in Degradation of Proteins Synthesized from Damaged Messenger RNA , 1996, Science.

[72]  A. Toussaint,et al.  Bacteriophage Mu repressor as a target for the Escherichia coli ATP‐dependent Clp Protease. , 1996, The EMBO journal.

[73]  R. Huber,et al.  Crystal structure of the 20S proteasome from the archaeon T. acidophilum at 3.4 A resolution. , 1995, Science.

[74]  M. Maurizi,et al.  Processive degradation of proteins by the ATP-dependent Clp protease from Escherichia coli. Requirement for the multiple array of active sites in ClpP but not ATP hydrolysis. , 1994, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[75]  M. Maurizi,et al.  Activity and specificity of Escherichia coli ClpAP protease in cleaving model peptide substrates. , 1994, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[76]  B. Welch.  The structure , 1992 .

[77]  R. Sauer,et al.  Carboxy-terminal determinants of intracellular protein degradation. , 1990, Genes & development.

[78]  J U Bowie,et al.  Identification of C-terminal extensions that protect proteins from intracellular proteolysis. , 1989, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[79]  Susan M. Teare,et al.  At Sixes and Sevens , 1988 .