Early arterial access for REBOA is related to survival outcome in trauma.

BACKGROUND Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) has been used in refractory hemorrhagic shock patients. Since the optimal timing of arterial access remains unclear, we evaluated the preocclusion status of patients, and elapsed time from the arrival to the hospital is associated with the survival outcomes in the REBOA patients. METHODS From August 2011 to December 2016, The Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology in Emergency, Critical care and Trauma-Intra-Aortic Balloon Occlusion (DIRECT-IABO) investigators registered refractory hemorrhagic shock patients undergoing REBOA from 23 hospitals in Japan. Patient characteristics, mechanism of injury, Injury Severity Score (ISS), preocclusion and postocclusion systolic blood pressure, duration of aortic occlusion, clinical time course, and survival outcome were recorded and analyzed. Binary logistic regression analysis was used with mortality and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was conducted to demonstrate the difference between early and delayed access groups. RESULTS Among the enrolled 207 cases, the following patients were excluded from the analysis: five since they were younger than 18 years, nine due to failed attempts at REBOA, 51 nontrauma patients, and 33 who received resuscitative thoracotomy plus REBOA. Thus, the remaining 109 cases were analyzed (30-day survivors, n = 60; nonsurvivors, n = 49). The preocclusion systolic blood pressure was higher, and both hospital arrival to initial arterial access and duration of occlusion were shorter in the survivors. Lower ISS (odds ratio, 0.944; 95% confidence interval, 0.907-0.982; p = 0.0039) and shorter arrival to access (odds ratio, 0.989; 95% confidence interval, 0.979-0.999; p = 0.034) were significantly associated with 30-day survival in the logistic regression analysis. The cutoff point of 21.5 minutes was used in the receiver operating characteristic analysis. The early access group showed a significantly shorter time of arrival to definitive hemostasis and also demonstrated a significantly higher survival in the Kaplan-Meier survival analysis (p = 0.014, Log-rank test). CONCLUSION The arrival to access time and ISS were significantly associated with mortality in the REBOA patients in Japan. The early access group demonstrated better survival. The proactive early access in the resuscitation phase might be related to better patient outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic/care management, level V.

[1]  H. Kondo,et al.  Non-traumatic hemorrhage is controlled with REBOA in acute phase then mortality increases gradually by non-hemorrhagic causes: DIRECT-IABO registry in Japan , 2018, European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery.

[2]  W. Teeter,et al.  Time to aortic occlusion: It’s all about access , 2017, The journal of trauma and acute care surgery.

[3]  H. Kondo,et al.  Fewer REBOA complications with smaller devices and partial occlusion: evidence from a multicentre registry in Japan , 2017, Emergency Medicine Journal.

[4]  H. Kondo,et al.  Partial occlusion, conversion from thoracotomy, undelayed but shorter occlusion: resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta strategy in Japan , 2017, European journal of emergency medicine : official journal of the European Society for Emergency Medicine.

[5]  Jeremy W. Cannon,et al.  The AAST prospective Aortic Occlusion for Resuscitation in Trauma and Acute Care Surgery (AORTA) registry: Data on contemporary utilization and outcomes of aortic occlusion and resuscitative balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) , 2016, The journal of trauma and acute care surgery.

[6]  A. Shiraishi,et al.  Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta might be dangerous in patients with severe torso trauma: A propensity score analysis , 2016, The journal of trauma and acute care surgery.

[7]  Jeremy W. Cannon,et al.  A systematic review of the use of resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta in the management of hemorrhagic shock , 2016, The journal of trauma and acute care surgery.

[8]  Y. Ichinose,et al.  Damage control interventional radiology (DCIR) in prompt and rapid endovascular strategies in trauma occasions (PRESTO): A new paradigm. , 2015, Diagnostic and interventional imaging.

[9]  T. Scalea,et al.  Basic endovascular skills for trauma course: Bridging the gap between endovascular techniques and the acute care surgeon , 2014, The journal of trauma and acute care surgery.

[10]  D. Schwartz,et al.  Are we delivering two standards of care for pelvic trauma? Availability of angioembolization after hours and on weekends increases time to therapeutic intervention , 2014, The journal of trauma and acute care surgery.

[11]  Todd E Rasmussen,et al.  Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) as an adjunct for hemorrhagic shock. , 2011, The Journal of trauma.

[12]  Huai Luo,et al.  Echocardiographic guidance for diagnostic and therapeutic percutaneous procedures. , 2011, Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy.

[13]  E. Lerner,et al.  The Golden Hour : Scientific Fact or Medical ‘ ‘ Urban Legend ’ ’ ? , 2001 .

[14]  Cowley Ra,et al.  Trauma center. A new concept for the delivery of critical care. , 1977 .

[15]  E. Bulger,et al.  The pitfalls of resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta: Risk factors and mitigation strategies , 2017, The journal of trauma and acute care surgery.

[16]  R. Tesoriero,et al.  Angiographic embolization for hemorrhage following pelvic fracture: Is it “time” for a paradigm shift? , 2017, The journal of trauma and acute care surgery.