With varying aptitudes in different occupations,individuals typically maximize income by specializing in one occupation which promises the highest income. Due to numerous labor market imperfections anduncertainties, the choice of best occupation is accomplished with only partial success. We demonstrate that an income tax that reduces after-tax income differentials across occupations tends to exacerbate the errors of choice made by individuals. Following a model proposed by Tinbergen (1951) and developed by Houthakker (1974), we use Luce’s (1959) multinomial logit approach to evaluate the magnitude of the distortions due to errors in occupational choice caused by income taxation. In an example, we show that the deadweight loss can be as high as a third of total income.
[1]
E. Sheshinski.
Wage Policy in the Public Sector and Income Distribution
,
1982
.
[2]
Eric J. Johnson,et al.
The Construction of Preference: Do Defaults Save Lives?
,
2006
.
[3]
R. Duncan Luce,et al.
Individual Choice Behavior: A Theoretical Analysis
,
1979
.
[4]
R. Luce,et al.
Individual Choice Behavior: A Theoretical Analysis.
,
1960
.
[5]
Eytan Sheshinski,et al.
Bounded Rationality and Socially Optimal Limits on Choice in a Self-Selection Model
,
2003,
SSRN Electronic Journal.
[6]
H. Houthakker.
The Size Distribution of Labour Incomes Derived from the Distribution of Aptitudes
,
1974
.