A novel probabilistic approach to generating PTV with partial voxel contributions

Abstract Radiotherapy treatment planning for use with high-energy photon beams currently employs a binary approach in defining the planning target volume (PTV). We propose a margin concept that takes the beam directions into account, generating beam-dependent PTVs (bdPTVs) on a beam-by-beam basis. The resulting degree of overlaps between the bdPTVs are used within the optimisation process; the optimiser effectively considers the same voxel to be both target and organ at risk (OAR) with fractional contributions. We investigate the impact of this novel approach when applied to prostate radiotherapy treatments, and compare treatment plans generated using beam dependent margins to conventional margins. Five prostate patients were used in this planning study, and plans using beam dependent margins improved the sparing of high doses to target-surrounding OARs, though a trade-off in delivering additional low dose to the OARs can be observed. Plans using beam dependent margins are observed to have a slightly reduced target coverage. Nevertheless, all plans are able to satisfy 90% population coverage with the target receiving at least 95% of the prescribed dose to \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{upgreek} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document} }{}$D_{98\%}$ \end{document}D98%.

[1]  J. Battista,et al.  Limitations of a convolution method for modeling geometric uncertainties in radiation therapy. I. The effect of shift invariance. , 2003, Medical physics.

[2]  S. Hanvey,et al.  The influence of MRI scan position on patients with oropharyngeal cancer undergoing radical radiotherapy , 2013, Radiation Oncology.

[3]  J. Siebers,et al.  Coverage-based treatment planning: optimizing the IMRT PTV to meet a CTV coverage criterion. , 2009, Medical physics.

[4]  S Nill,et al.  Assessment of MLC tracking performance during hypofractionated prostate radiotherapy using real-time dose reconstruction , 2016, Physics in medicine and biology.

[5]  Uwe Oelfke,et al.  Online correction for respiratory motion: evaluation of two different imaging geometries , 2005, Physics in medicine and biology.

[6]  Peter Ziegenhein,et al.  Interactive dose shaping part 2: proof of concept study for six prostate patients , 2016, Physics in medicine and biology.

[7]  Jeffrey V Siebers,et al.  Coverage-based treatment planning to accommodate deformable organ variations in prostate cancer treatment. , 2014, Medical physics.

[8]  N Hodapp,et al.  [The ICRU Report 83: prescribing, recording and reporting photon-beam intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT)]. , 2012, Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al].

[9]  Rasmus Bokrantz,et al.  The scenario-based generalization of radiation therapy margins , 2015, Physics in medicine and biology.

[10]  P. Evans,et al.  A comparison of the use of bony anatomy and internal markers for offline verification and an evaluation of the potential benefit of online and offline verification protocols for prostate radiotherapy. , 2008, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[11]  Jake Van Dyk,et al.  Limitations of a convolution method for modeling geometric uncertainties in radiation therapy: the radiobiological dose-per-fraction effect. , 2004, Medical physics.

[12]  M Alber,et al.  Robust optimization based upon statistical theory. , 2010, Medical physics.

[13]  Paul J Keall,et al.  Multileaf Collimator Tracking Improves Dose Delivery for Prostate Cancer Radiation Therapy: Results of the First Clinical Trial. , 2015, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[14]  E Weiss,et al.  Coverage optimized planning: probabilistic treatment planning based on dose coverage histogram criteria. , 2010, Medical physics.

[15]  A comparison of three optimization algorithms for intensity modulated radiation therapy. , 2008, Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik.

[16]  Paul Keall,et al.  A method of dose reconstruction for moving targets compatible with dynamic treatments. , 2012, Medical physics.

[17]  J. Unkelbach,et al.  Inclusion of organ movements in IMRT treatment planning via inverse planning based on probability distributions. , 2004, Physics in medicine and biology.

[18]  Uwe Oelfke,et al.  Noncoplanar VMAT for nasopharyngeal tumors: Plan quality versus treatment time. , 2015, Medical physics.

[19]  M. V. van Herk,et al.  The probability of correct target dosage: dose-population histograms for deriving treatment margins in radiotherapy. , 2000, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[20]  V S Khoo,et al.  New developments in MRI for target volume delineation in radiotherapy. , 2006, The British journal of radiology.

[21]  Peter Ziegenhein,et al.  Performance-optimized clinical IMRT planning on modern CPUs , 2013, Physics in medicine and biology.

[22]  M. V. van Herk,et al.  PlanJury: probabilistic plan evaluation revisited , 2014 .

[23]  M McJury,et al.  The influence of MRI scan position on image registration accuracy, target delineation and calculated dose in prostatic radiotherapy. , 2012, The British journal of radiology.

[24]  Martin F Fast,et al.  Dynamic tumor tracking using the Elekta Agility MLC. , 2014, Medical physics.