Effects of tunnelling on existing support systems of perpendicularly crossing tunnels

The interactions between perpendicularly crossing tunnels in the Sydney region are investigated using a full three-dimensional (3D) finite element analysis coupled with elasto-plastic material models. Special attention is paid to the effect of subsequent tunnelling on the support system, i.e. the shotcrete lining and rock bolts, of the existing tunnel. The results of the analysis show that in a region such as Sydney, with relatively high horizontal stresses, installation of the new tunnel causes the shotcrete lining of the existing tunnel to be in tension in the side facing towards the tunnel opening and in compression at the crown and invert. The pre-stressed rock bolts are usually tensioned more in the sections closest to the tunnel opening. For this particular study, if a new tunnel is driven perpendicularly beneath an existing tunnel, significant increases are induced in the bending moments in the shotcrete lining at the lateral sides of the existing tunnel and in the axial forces at its crown and invert. The increase in side bending moments causes further tensile cracking but the crown and invert stresses remain within the thresholds for both compressive failure and tensile cracking for shotcrete lining of typical concrete quality. Moreover, the driving of the new tunnel causes the tensile forces in the existing side rock bolts to increase and those in the existing crown rock bolts to decrease. In contrast, if the new tunnel is driven perpendicularly above the existing tunnel, compressive failure of the existing shotcrete lining is induced at the crown of the deeper tunnel for concrete of typical capacity and a significant tensile force increase of the existing rock bolts around the crown. It is concluded that in order to ensure the stability of the existing tunnel, local thickening is needed at the sides of the existing shotcrete lining if the shallow tunnel is installed first and local thickening is needed at the crown if the deep tunnel is installed first.

[1]  David M. Potts,et al.  Twin Tunnel Interaction: Surface and Subsurface Effects , 2001 .

[2]  Takeshi Asano,et al.  An observational excavation control method for adjacent mountain tunnels , 2003 .

[3]  Robert J. Mair,et al.  Prediction of ground movements and assessment of risk of building damage due to bored tunnelling , 1996 .

[4]  P. Pells,et al.  Developments in the design of tunnels and caverns in the Triassic rocks of the Sydney region , 2002 .

[5]  Charles Wang Wai Ng,et al.  Three-dimensional numerical investigations of new Austrian tunnelling method (NATM) twin tunnel interactions , 2004 .

[6]  David M. Potts,et al.  Influence of Mesh Geometry on Three-Dimensional Finite-Element Analysis of Tunnel Excavation , 2005 .

[7]  Isam Shahrour,et al.  Three‐dimensional finite element analysis of the interaction between tunneling and pile foundations , 2002 .

[8]  Harry G. Poulos,et al.  Analytical Prediction for Tunneling-Induced Ground Movements in Clays , 1998 .

[9]  R. Peck.  Deep excavations and tunnelling in soft ground , 1969 .

[10]  Charles E. Augarde,et al.  Three‐dimensional finite element analysis of lined tunnels , 2001 .

[11]  Pieter A. Vermeer,et al.  On a smart use of 3D-FEM in tunnelling , 2002 .

[12]  Harvey J. Burd,et al.  Model testing and analysis of interactions between tunnels in clay , 1996 .

[13]  Isao Yamazaki,et al.  STUDY OF GROUND-TUNNEL INTERACTIONS OF FOUR SHIELD TUNNELS DRIVEN IN CLOSE PROXIMITY, IN RELATION TO DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF PARALLEL SHIELD TUNNELS , 1998 .

[14]  John P. Carter,et al.  Full 3D modelling for effects of tunnelling on existing support systems in the Sydney region , 2008 .

[15]  John P. Carter,et al.  Three-dimensional modelling for effects of tunnelling on existing support systems , 2007 .