Contrasting responses of bumble bees to feeding conspecifics on their familiar and unfamiliar flowers
暂无分享,去创建一个
Yukihiko Toquenaga | Y. Toquenaga | Kazuharu Ohashi | Lina G Kawaguchi | K. Ohashi | Lina G. Kawaguchi | Kazuharu Ohashi
[1] M. Rosenzweig,et al. Competition and food selection field tests of a theory , 1985 .
[2] B. Heinrich. Ravens in Winter , 1989 .
[3] W. Maddison,et al. Behavior of bumble bee pollinators of Aralia hispida Vent. (Araliaceae) , 1982, Oecologia.
[4] Lars Chittka,et al. Facultative use of the repellent scent mark in foraging bumblebees: complex versus simple flowers , 2006, Animal Behaviour.
[5] Thomas J Valone,et al. Public information for the assessment of quality: a widespread social phenomenon. , 2002, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.
[6] B. Heinrich. Resource Partitioning Among Some Eusocial Insects: Bumblebees , 1976 .
[7] N. Waser,et al. CHAPTER 10 – The Adaptive Nature of Floral Traits: Ideas and Eviaence , 1983 .
[8] Tamiji Inoue,et al. Aggressive foraging of social bees as a mechanism of floral resource partitioning in an Asian tropical rainforest , 1997, Oecologia.
[9] Wayne C. Houtcooper,et al. Distribution and Abundance , 1974 .
[10] T. White,et al. The importance of a relative shortage of food in animal ecology , 2004, Oecologia.
[11] Elizabeth A. Sandlin,et al. Cue use affects resource subdivision among three coexisting hummingbird species , 2000 .
[12] E. A. Sandlin. Foraging information affects the nature of competitive interactions , 2000 .
[13] M. Lozada,et al. Local enhancement in the wasp Vespula germanica Are visual cues all that matter? , 2000, Insectes Sociaux.
[14] Y. Toquenaga,et al. Do bumble bees save time when choosing novel flowers by following conspecifics , 2006 .
[15] A. D. Brian. DIFFERENCES IN THE FLOWERS VISITED BY FOUR SPECIES OF BUMBLE-BEES AND THEIR CAUSES , 1957 .
[16] James D. Thomson,et al. The Natural History of Bumblebees: A Sourcebook for Investigations , 2001 .
[17] D. Papaj,et al. Flower choice copying in bumblebees , 2005, Biology Letters.
[18] S. Sakai,et al. Findings on spatial foraging patterns of bumblebees (Bombus ignitus) from a bee-tracking experiment in a net cage , 2004, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.
[19] P. Wetherwax,et al. Why do honeybees reject certain flowers? , 1986, Oecologia.
[20] S. Sakai,et al. Does interaction between bumblebees (Bombus ignitus) reduce their foraging area?: bee-removal experiments in a net cage , 2005, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.
[21] Martin Giurfa,et al. Honeybees mark with scent and reject recently visited flowers , 2004, Oecologia.
[22] H. Dreisig. Ideal free distributions of nectar foraging bumblebees , 1995 .
[23] D. Paton,et al. Peripheral Foraging by Territorial Rufous Hummingbirds: Defense by Exploitation , 1984 .
[24] D. H. Morse,et al. Crab spiders affect flower visitation by bees , 2003 .
[25] J. Biesmeijer,et al. The use of field–based social information in eusocial foragers: local enhancement among nestmates and heterospecifics in stingless bees , 2003 .
[26] Intraspecific resource partitioning in brown trout: the temporal distribution of foraging is determined by social rank , 2001 .
[27] D. Inouye. Resource Partitioning in Bumblebees: Experimental Studies of Foraging Behavior , 1978 .
[28] L. Giraldeau,et al. Food exploitation: searching for the optimal joining policy. , 1999, Trends in ecology & evolution.
[29] L. Chittka,et al. Flower Constancy, Insect Psychology, and Plant Evolution , 1999, Naturwissenschaften.
[30] J. Thomson. Field Measures of Flower Constancy in Bumblebees , 1981 .
[31] L. Chittka,et al. A new mode of information transfer in foraging bumblebees? , 2005, Current Biology.
[32] J C Stout,et al. Foraging bumblebees avoid flowers already visited by conspecifics or by other bumblebee species , 1998, Animal Behaviour.
[33] M. Rodríguez-Gironés. Resource partitioning among flower visitors: extensions of Possingham’s model , 2006 .
[34] L. Chittka,et al. Social Learning: Public Information in Insects , 2005, Current Biology.
[35] D. J. Howell. Flock Foraging in Nectar-Feeding Bats: Advantages to the Bats and to the Host Plants , 1979, The American Naturalist.
[36] W. Sutherland. From Individual Behaviour to Population Ecology , 1996 .
[37] J C Stout,et al. The influence of nectar secretion rates on the responses of bumblebees (Bombus spp.) to previously visited flowers , 2002, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.
[38] Hugh P. Possingham,et al. The Distribution and Abundance of Resources Encountered by a Forager , 1989, The American Naturalist.
[39] L. Harder,et al. Response of traplining bumble bees to competition experiments: shifts in feeding location and efficiency , 2004, Oecologia.
[40] M. Hunter,et al. 1 – Natural Variability in Plants and Animals , 1992 .
[41] M. Raveret Richter,et al. Resource choice of social wasps: influence of presence, size and species of resident wasps , 1999, Insectes Sociaux.
[42] R. Vargas,et al. Local enhancement of arrivals of Ceratitis capitata females on fruit mimics , 2000 .
[43] Sasha R. X. Dall,et al. Information and its use by animals in evolutionary ecology. , 2005, Trends in ecology & evolution.
[44] T. Valone,et al. Public Information: From Nosy Neighbors to Cultural Evolution , 2004, Science.
[45] James D. Thomson,et al. Trapline foraging by bumble bees: II. Definition and detection from sequence data , 1997 .
[46] Bernd Heinrich,et al. THE FORAGING SPECIALIZATIONS OF INDIVIDUAL BUMBLEBEES , 1976 .
[47] Bernd Heinrich,et al. "Majoring" and "Minoring" by Foraging Bumblebees, Bombus Vagans: An Experimental Analysis , 1979 .
[48] C. Barnard,et al. Individually recognizable scent marks on flowers made by a solitary bee , 2001, Animal Behaviour.
[49] T. Yahara,et al. Visit larger displays but probe proportionally fewer flowers: counterintuitive behaviour of nectar-collecting bumble bees achieves an ideal free distribution , 2002 .