Modelling and Assessment of the Effectiveness of Government Information Technologies Value Space Approach with a Public Sector Case Study in Turkey

In the context of evaluating effectiveness of information systems, the public sector requires a specific approach for measuring indirect benefits such as strategic / political value. There is not yet a holistic approach and no unified adaptive and time‐variant model addressing the problem. A model for assessing both initiatives and ex‐post benefits is needed. In this paper, we describe the Strategic Management Model, developed and partially applied at the Ministry of Finance, Turkey. The model merges public value, strategic goals, service delivery value chain, performance indicators, continuous monitoring and evaluation, and asset management concepts in the Public Financial Management Value Space. This is compliant with Government Finance Statistics, which is the basis for our Public Financial Management Value Space, with dimensions, in which every node and path is defined as an object within this value space. This adaptive model will allow multi‐dimensional assessment, enabling backward traceability, establishing the necessary links between the performance, goals and budget.

[1]  Stephen N. Luko,et al.  Risk Management Principles and Guidelines , 2013 .

[2]  A. Nusret Güçlü,et al.  Ontology Driven Government Services Inventory and Business Process Management , 2010, BMMDS/EMMSAD.

[3]  Semih Bilgen,et al.  Process based public value and effectiveness of government information systems , 2010, 2010 Fourth International Conference on Research Challenges in Information Science (RCIS).

[4]  Gul Tokdemir.  AN ASSESSMENT MODEL FOR WEB-BASED INFORMATION SYSTEM EFFECTIVENESS: SEWISS , 2010 .

[5]  Theresa A. Pardo,et al.  Digital Government Implementation: A Comparative Study in USA and Russia , 2010, AMCIS.

[6]  William Golden,et al.  Understanding Net Benefits: A Citizen-Based Perspective on eGovernment Success , 2009, ICIS.

[7]  Lan Cao,et al.  Validating the is-Impact Model: Two Exploratory Case Studies in China and Malaysia , 2009, PACIS.

[8]  Darshana Sedera,et al.  Re-conceptualizing Information System Success: The IS-Impact Measurement Model , 2008, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[9]  Sevgi Özkan,et al.  A Maturity Based Qualitative Information Systems Effectiveness Evaluation of a Public Organization in Turkey , 2008, J. Cases Inf. Technol..

[10]  Ephraim R. McLean,et al.  Measuring information systems success: models, dimensions, measures, and interrelationships , 2008, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[11]  Peter E.D. Love,et al.  Evaluating Information Systems: Public and Private Sector , 2008 .

[12]  Peter B. Seddon,et al.  IT project evaluation: Why more formal evaluation is not necessarily better , 2008 .

[13]  Tom Ralser.  ROI For Nonprofits: The New Key to Sustainability , 2007 .

[14]  Sevgi Özkan,et al.  Process based information systems evaluation: towards the attributes of "PRISE" , 2007, J. Enterp. Inf. Manag..

[15]  James Guthrie,et al.  A Framework for Identifying the Intangible Capital Value of ICT Investments , 2007, PACIS.

[16]  Richard Collins.  The BBC and public value , 2007 .

[17]  Rob McLean,et al.  Alignment: Using the Balanced Scorecard to Create Corporate Synergies , 2006 .

[18]  Martin I. Cole,et al.  Unlocking Public Value: A New Model For Achieving High Performance In Public Service Organizations , 2006 .

[19]  Yong Hu,et al.  A research on the appraisal framework of e-government project success , 2005, ICEC '05.

[20]  N. Bhushan,et al.  Strategic Decision Making: Applying the Analytic Hierarchy Process , 2004 .

[21]  A. Cresswell.  Return on Investment In Information Technology: A Guide for Managers , 2004 .

[22]  Darshana Sedera,et al.  A Factor and Structural Equation analysis of the Enterprise Systems Success Measurement Model , 2004, AMCIS.

[23]  Daniel Andriessen,et al.  Making Sense of Intellectual Capital: Designing a Method for the Valuation of Intangibles , 2003 .

[24]  Paul R. Niven.  Balanced Scorecard Step-by-Step for Government and Nonprofit Agencies , 2003 .

[25]  Joseph M. Firestone,et al.  Key Issues in the New Knowledge Management , 2003 .

[26]  Ephraim R. McLean,et al.  The DeLone and McLean Model of Information Systems Success: A Ten-Year Update , 2003, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[27]  V. Allee.  The future of knowledge : increasing prosperity through value networks , 2003 .

[28]  Ephraim R. McLean,et al.  Information systems success revisited , 2002, Proceedings of the 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[29]  B. Lev.  Intangibles: Management, Measurement, and Reporting , 2001 .

[30]  R. Boulton,et al.  Cracking the Value Code: How Successful Businesses are Creating Wealth in the New Economy , 2000 .

[31]  P. H. Sullivan.  Value Driven Intellectual Capital: How to Convert Intangible Corporate Assets Into Market Value , 2000 .

[32]  D. Sandy Staples,et al.  Dimensions of Information Systems Success , 1999, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[33]  August-Wilhelm Scheer,et al.  ARIS - Business Process Modeling , 1998 .

[34]  Peter B. Seddon.  A Respecification and Extension of the DeLone and McLean Model of IS Success , 1997, Inf. Syst. Res..

[35]  W. V. Grembergen.  Millennium conversion & COBIT , 1997 .

[36]  R. Kaplan,et al.  Using the balanced scorecard as a strategic management system , 1996 .

[37]  M. Moore.  Creating public value : strategic management in government , 1995 .

[38]  Ephraim R. McLean,et al.  Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable , 1992, Inf. Syst. Res..

[39]  W. Edwards Deming,et al.  Out of the Crisis , 1982 .