Perceived Contrast Explains Asymmetries in Visual-Search Tasks with Shaded Stimuli

Shaded stimuli have traditionally been used in the context of three-dimensional (3-D) shape perception. Many studies have shown a persistent asymmetry in that a circle filled with a shaded gradient that is dark at the top and bright at the bottom (top-dark circle) is much easier to locate among top-bright circles than in the opposite arrangement (a top-bright circle among top-dark circles). The immediate 3-D interpretation of top-dark and top-bright circles as hollows and protuberances, respectively, and the asymmetry just described have been explained in terms of 3-D percepts. The work described here challenges this view: the results of the first experiment show that top-dark circles are perceived as having 10% higher contrast than top-bright circles of the same physical contrast. Experiment 2 replicates classical visual-search experiments but adding a new condition where target and distractors were subjectively equated in contrast. For five of six subjects, the ubiquitous asymmetry disappears in this condition.

[1]  V. S. Ramachandran,et al.  Perception of shape from shading , 1988, Nature.

[2]  William Curran,et al.  The effect of Illuminant position on perceived curvature , 1996, Vision Research.

[3]  M A García-Pérez,et al.  Yes-No Staircases with Fixed Step Sizes: Psychometric Properties and Optimal Setup , 2001, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[4]  A Johnston,et al.  Shape from Shading. I: Surface Curvature and Orientation , 1994, Perception.

[5]  D. Todd,et al.  The Sun , 1870, Nature.

[6]  Ronald A. Rensink,et al.  Influence of scene-based properties on visual search. , 1990, Science.

[7]  P. Mamassian,et al.  Prior knowledge on the illumination position , 2001, Cognition.

[8]  Pietro Perona,et al.  Early computation of shape and reflectance in the visual system , 1996, Nature.

[9]  E. Mingolla,et al.  Perception of solid shape from shading , 1989, Biological Cybernetics.

[10]  V. Ramachandran,et al.  On the perception of shape from shading , 1988, Nature.

[11]  A Johnston,et al.  Shape from Shading. II. Geodesic Bisection and Alignment , 1994, Perception.

[12]  E. Mingolla,et al.  Perception of surface curvature and direction of illumination from patterns of shading. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[13]  V S Ramachandran,et al.  Perceiving shape from shading. , 1988, Scientific American.

[14]  Lawrence A. Symons,et al.  Orientation tuning of shapefrom shading , 2000 .

[15]  Ronald A. Rensink,et al.  Sensitivity To Three-Dimensional Orientation in Visual Search , 1990 .

[16]  J T Todd,et al.  Perceived depth inversion of smoothly curved surfaces due to image orientation. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[17]  Deborah J. Aks,et al.  Visual search for direction of shading is influenced by apparent depth , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.

[18]  L. A. Symons,et al.  Orientation tuning of shape from shading. , 2000, Perception & psychophysics.

[19]  J Sun,et al.  Shading and Stereo in Early Perception of Shape and Reflectance , 1997, Perception.

[20]  J. Braun Shape-from-shading is independent of visual attention and may be a 'texton'. , 1993, Spatial vision.

[21]  P. Perona,et al.  Preattentive Perception of Elementary Three-dimensional Shapes , 1996, Vision Research.

[22]  Melvyn A. Goodale,et al.  A neurological dissociation between shape from shading and shape from edges , 1996, Behavioural Brain Research.