Time preference in global warming calculations: a proposal for a unified index

Abstract Many aspects of the calculation of the impacts of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and the costs and benefits of possible response options are highly sensitive to the way in which time preference is incorporated into the computations. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) used global warming potentials (GWPs) to standardize inputs of different gases with differing radiative forcings and atmospheric lifetimes; in the results emphasized by the IPCC's Second Assessment Report, a 100-year time horizon and no discounting is used, and this has been adopted by the Kyoto Protocol for use in the first commitment period (2008–2012). Here an alternative unified index is proposed that assigns explicit weights to the interests of different generations. In contrast to discounting (including the zero discount rate used by the IPCC), the generationally weighted index forces policy makers to face the moral assumptions that underlie their choices related to global warming.

[1]  Philip M. Fearnside,et al.  Global Warming and Tropical Land-Use Change: Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Biomass Burning, Decomposition and Soils in Forest Conversion, Shifting Cultivation and Secondary Vegetation , 2000 .

[2]  Colin W. Clark,et al.  Mathematical Bioeconomics: The Optimal Management of Renewable Resources. , 1993 .

[3]  Kenneth R. Richards,et al.  The time value of carbon in bottom‐up studies , 1997 .

[4]  R. Howarth,et al.  Intergenerational transfers and the social discount rate , 1993 .

[5]  G. Müller,et al.  The Scientific Basis , 1995 .

[6]  Donald J. Wuebbles,et al.  Radiative forcing of climate , 1991 .

[7]  J. Houghton.  Climate change 1994 : radiative forcing of climate change and an evaluation of the IPCC IS92 emission scenarios , 1995 .

[8]  Andrew J. Weaver.  The Science of Climate Change , 2003 .

[9]  William D. Nordhaus,et al.  Discounting In Economics and Climate Change; An Editorial Comment , 1997 .

[10]  G. Watts,et al.  Climate Change 1995 , 1998 .

[11]  Philip M. Fearnside.  The Value of Human Life in Global Warming Impacts , 1998 .

[12]  P. Fearnside.  Forest management in Amazonia: the need for new criteria in evaluating development options , 1989 .

[13]  T. Power.  For the Common Good: Redirecting the Economy toward Community, the Environment, and a Sustainable Future , 1993 .

[14]  William D. Nordhaus,et al.  Rolling the ‘DICE’: an optimal transition path for controlling greenhouse gases , 1993 .

[15]  J. Bongaarts,et al.  Climate Change: The IPCC Scientific Assessment. , 1992 .

[16]  Thomas Sterner,et al.  Discounting and Distributional Considerations in the Context of Global Warming. , 1996 .

[17]  J. Houghton,et al.  Climate change 2001 : the scientific basis , 2001 .

[18]  R. Tol.  The damage costs of climate change towards a dynamic representation , 1996 .

[19]  Keith P. Shine,et al.  Radiative Forcing of Climate Change , 2000 .

[20]  W. Cline.  Economics of Global Warming, The , 1992 .

[21]  C. Spash.  Double CO2 and beyond: benefits, costs and compensation , 1994 .

[22]  D. Lashof,et al.  Relative contributions of greenhouse gas emissions to global warming , 1990, Nature.

[23]  J. Houghton,et al.  Climate change 1992 : the supplementary report to the IPCC scientific assessment , 1992 .

[24]  Philip M. Fearnside,et al.  Global warming response options in Brazil's forest sector: Comparison of project-level costs and benefits , 1995 .

[25]  Ari Rabl,et al.  Discounting of long-term costs: What would future generations prefer us to do? , 1996 .

[26]  J. Houghton,et al.  Climate change 1995: the science of climate change. , 1996 .

[27]  J. Horowitz.  Environmental Policy Under a Non-Market Discount Rate , 1996 .

[28]  Philip M. Fearnside,et al.  Accounting for time in Mitigating Global Warming through land-use change and forestry , 2000 .

[29]  Antony Scott,et al.  Trust law, sustainability, and responsible action , 1999 .

[30]  B. Solberg,et al.  Conceptual issues related to carbon sequestration: uncertainty and time. , 1997 .

[31]  Sensitivity of direct global warming potentials to key uncertainties , 1995 .

[32]  G. Heal.  Discounting and Climate Change , 1997 .

[33]  Simon Pinnock,et al.  Radiative forcing of climate change by CFC‐11 and possible CFC replacements , 1997 .

[34]  T. Crowards.  Discounting and sustainable development: adjusting the rate, abandoning the process, or extending the approach , 1997 .

[35]  G. Heal.  Discounting and Climate Change; An Editorial Comment , 1997 .

[36]  P. Fearnside.  Greenhouse-gas emissions from Amazonian hydroelectric reservoirs: the example of Brazil's Tucuruí Dam as compared to fossil fuel alternatives , 1997, Environmental Conservation.

[37]  Why economists discount future benefits , 1996 .

[38]  K. Arrow,et al.  Is There a Role for Benefit-Cost Analysis in Environmental, Health, and Safety Regulation? , 1996, Science.

[39]  Philip M. Fearnside,et al.  Why a 100-Year Time Horizon should be used for GlobalWarming Mitigation Calculations , 2002 .

[40]  Ian H. Rowlands,et al.  Valuing climate change: the economics of the greenhouse , 1995 .

[41]  G. Daily,et al.  An exploratory model of the impact of rapid climate change on the world food situation , 1990, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[42]  Peter G. Brown,et al.  Stewardship of Climate; An Editorial Comment , 1997 .

[43]  E. Arrhenius,et al.  The greenhouse effect : implications for economic development , 1990 .

[44]  M. Weitzman.  Why the Far-Distant Future Should Be Discounted at Its Lowest Possible Rate , 1998 .