Binocular Rivalry Requires Visual Attention

An interocular conflict arises when different images are presented to each eye at the same spatial location. The visual system resolves this conflict through binocular rivalry: observers consciously perceive spontaneous alternations between the two images. Visual attention is generally important for resolving competition between neural representations. However, given the seemingly spontaneous and automatic nature of binocular rivalry, the role of attention in resolving interocular competition remains unclear. Here we test whether visual attention is necessary to produce rivalry. Using an EEG frequency-tagging method to track cortical representations of the conflicting images, we show that when attention was diverted away, rivalry stopped. The EEG data further suggested that the neural representations of the dichoptic images combined without attention. Thus, attention is necessary for dichoptic images to be engaged in sustained rivalry and may be generally required for resolving conflicting, potentially ambiguous input and giving a single interpretation access to consciousness.

[1]  R. Srinivasan,et al.  Nonlinear SSVEP responses are sensitive to the perceptual binding of visual hemifields during conventional ‘eye’ rivalry and interocular ‘percept’ rivalry , 2009, Brain Research.

[2]  Toshimitsu Musha,et al.  Electric Dipole Tracing in the Brain by Means of the Boundary Element Method and Its Accuracy , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[3]  Arjan Hillebrand,et al.  The temporal frequency tuning of human visual cortex investigated using synthetic aperture magnetometry , 2004, NeuroImage.

[4]  A. Norcia,et al.  A method for investigating binocular rivalry in real-time with the steady-state VEP , 1997, Vision Research.

[5]  Randolph Blake,et al.  Exogenous attention and endogenous attention influence initial dominance in binocular rivalry , 2006, Vision Research.

[6]  F. Tong,et al.  Can attention selectively bias bistable perception? Differences between binocular rivalry and ambiguous figures. , 2004, Journal of vision.

[7]  J. Serences,et al.  Spatial attention improves the quality of population codes in human visual cortex. , 2010, Journal of neurophysiology.

[8]  Zijiang J. He,et al.  Binocular Rivalry and Visual Awareness: The Role of Attention , 1999, Perception.

[9]  Timothy J Andrews,et al.  The Role of Voluntary and Involuntary Attention in Selecting Perceptual Dominance during Binocular Rivalry , 2007, Perception.

[10]  M. Clynes.  UNIDIRECTIONAL RATE SENSITIVITY: A BIOCYBERNETIC * LAW OF REFLEX AND HUMORAL SYSTEMS AS PHYSIOLOGIC CHANNELS OF CONTROL AND COMMUNICATION † , 1961, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[11]  M. Hämäläinen,et al.  Realistic conductivity geometry model of the human head for interpretation of neuromagnetic data , 1989, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[12]  A. Norcia,et al.  An adaptive filter for steady-state evoked responses. , 1995, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[13]  D. Heeger,et al.  Inter-ocular contrast normalization in human visual cortex. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[14]  Frans A. J. Verstraten,et al.  Attention Speeds Binocular Rivalry , 2006, Psychological science.

[15]  David Regan,et al.  A frequency domain technique for characterizing nonlinearities in biological systems , 1988 .

[16]  B. Hjorth.  An on-line transformation of EEG scalp potentials into orthogonal source derivations. , 1975, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[17]  D. Spinelli,et al.  Spatiotemporal analysis of the cortical sources of the steady‐state visual evoked potential , 2007, Human brain mapping.

[18]  W. Cobb,et al.  Cerebral Potentials evoked by Pattern Reversal and their Suppression in Visual Rivalry , 1967, Nature.

[19]  D. Levi,et al.  Evidence for nonlinear binocular interactions in human visual cortex , 1988, Vision Research.

[20]  S. Hillyard,et al.  Selective attention to stimulus location modulates the steady-state visual evoked potential. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[21]  J D Victor,et al.  Two-frequency analysis of interactions elicited by Vernier stimuli , 2000, Visual Neuroscience.

[22]  A Treisman,et al.  Feature binding, attention and object perception. , 1998, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[23]  Frans A. J. Verstraten,et al.  The Scope and Limits of Top-Down Attention in Unconscious Visual Processing , 2006, Current Biology.

[24]  P. Carmeliet,et al.  Object-based attention determines dominance in binocular rivalry , 2022 .

[25]  Randolph Blake,et al.  Hierarchy of cortical responses underlying binocular rivalry , 2007, Nature Neuroscience.

[26]  Matthias M. Müller,et al.  Magnetoencephalographic recording of steadystate visual evoked cortical activity , 2005, Brain Topography.

[27]  D. Carmel,et al.  Spatial Attention Can Modulate Unconscious Orientation Processing , 2008, Perception.

[28]  A. Norcia,et al.  Development of rivalry and dichoptic masking in human infants. , 1999, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[29]  A. Mizuno,et al.  A change of the leading player in flow Visualization technique , 2006, J. Vis..

[30]  R. Blake,et al.  Endogenous attention prolongs dominance durations in binocular rivalry. , 2005, Journal of vision.