Evaluating geo-social influence in location-based social networks

The emerging location-based social network (LBSN) services not only allow people to maintain cyber links with their friends, but also enable them to share the events happening on them at different locations. The geo-social correlations among event participants make it possible to quantify mutual user influence for various events. Such a quantification of influence could benefit a wide spectrum of real-life applications such as targeted advertising and viral marketing. In this paper, we perform an in-depth analysis of the geo-social correlations among LBSN users at event level, based on which we address two problems: user influence evaluation and influential events discovery. To capture the geo-social closeness between LBSN users, we propose a unified influence metric. This metric combines a novel social proximity measure named penalized hitting time, with a geographical weight function modeled by power law distribution. We propose two approximate algorithms, namely global iteration (GI) and dynamic neighborhood expansion (DNE), to efficiently evaluate user influence with tight theoretical error bounds. We then adopt the sampling technique and the threshold algorithm to support efficient retrieval of top-K influential events. Extensive experiments on both real-life and synthetic LBSN data sets confirm that the proposed algorithms are effective, efficient, and scalable.

[1]  Moni Naor,et al.  Optimal aggregation algorithms for middleware , 2001, PODS '01.

[2]  Jennifer Neville,et al.  Randomization tests for distinguishing social influence and homophily effects , 2010, WWW '10.

[3]  Philip S. Yu,et al.  Identifying the influential bloggers in a community , 2008, WSDM '08.

[4]  Ravi Kumar,et al.  Influence and correlation in social networks , 2008, KDD.

[5]  Jimeng Sun,et al.  Social influence analysis in large-scale networks , 2009, KDD.

[6]  Mo Chen,et al.  Clustering via Random Walk Hitting Time on Directed Graphs , 2008, AAAI.

[7]  Jon M. Kleinberg,et al.  The link-prediction problem for social networks , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[8]  Kenneth Ward Church,et al.  Query suggestion using hitting time , 2008, CIKM '08.

[9]  Qing Zhang,et al.  Assessing and ranking structural correlations in graphs , 2011, SIGMOD '11.

[10]  Cecilia Mascolo,et al.  Exploiting place features in link prediction on location-based social networks , 2011, KDD.

[11]  Albert-László Barabási,et al.  Understanding individual human mobility patterns , 2008, Nature.

[12]  Purnamrita Sarkar,et al.  A Tractable Approach to Finding Closest Truncated-commute-time Neighbors in Large Graphs , 2007, UAI.

[13]  Matthew Brand,et al.  A Random Walks Perspective on Maximizing Satisfaction and Profit , 2005, SDM.

[14]  Jennifer Widom,et al.  Scaling personalized web search , 2003, WWW '03.

[15]  Matthew Richardson,et al.  Yes, there is a correlation: - from social networks to personal behavior on the web , 2008, WWW.

[16]  Mark E. J. Newman,et al.  Power-Law Distributions in Empirical Data , 2007, SIAM Rev..

[17]  Purnamrita Sarkar,et al.  Fast incremental proximity search in large graphs , 2008, ICML '08.

[18]  Sergey Brin,et al.  The Anatomy of a Large-Scale Hypertextual Web Search Engine , 1998, Comput. Networks.

[19]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Everyone's an influencer: quantifying influence on twitter , 2011, WSDM '11.

[20]  Jure Leskovec,et al.  Friendship and mobility: user movement in location-based social networks , 2011, KDD.

[21]  Mao Ye,et al.  Exploiting geographical influence for collaborative point-of-interest recommendation , 2011, SIGIR.

[22]  Leo Katz,et al.  A new status index derived from sociometric analysis , 1953 .