Maximal Operational Workspace of Parallel Manipulators

Parallel manipulators are an interesting alternative to serial robots given the important mechanical and kinematic advantages offered. Nevertheless, they often present more complex and smaller workspaces with internal singularities (Altuzarra et al., 2004; Gosselin & Angeles, 1990). Thus, the workspace size, shape and quality are considered some of the main design criteria of these robots (Merlet et al., 1998). These robots often present multiple solutions for both the DKP and the IKP. The workspace singularity-free region where the manipulator is initially configured, i.e., the set of postures that a manipulator can reach in the same direct and inverse configuration, has been traditionally considered its operational workspace. This is due to the fact that it is widely extended the idea that to perform a transition between different kinematic solutions, the robot must cross a singular position where the control is lost, and that must be avoided (Hunt & Primrose, 1993). This idea leads to very limited operational workspaces. In this chapter, a general methodology for obtaining the maximal operational workspace where a parallel manipulator can move in a controllable way will be presented. The basis for enlarging the operational workspace consists in superimposing all the singularity-free regions of the workspace associated with the same assembly mode for all different robot work3

[1]  Clément Gosselin,et al.  Determination of the maximal singularity-free zones in the six-dimensional workspace of the general Gough-Stewart platform , 2007 .

[2]  Charles Pinto,et al.  Transitions between Multiple Solutions of the Direct Kinematic Problem , 2008 .

[3]  Jeha Ryu,et al.  WORKSPACE ANALYSIS OF 6-PRRS PARALLEL MANIPULATORS BASED ON THE VERTEX SPACE CONCEPT , 1999 .

[4]  Charles Pinto,et al.  Workspaces associated to assembly modes of the 5R planar parallel manipulator , 2008, Robotica.

[5]  R. W. Daniel,et al.  An Explanation of Never-Special Assembly Changing Motions for 3–3 Parallel Manipulators , 1999, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[6]  S. Agrawal Workspace boundaries of in-parallel manipulator systems , 1991, Fifth International Conference on Advanced Robotics 'Robots in Unstructured Environments.

[7]  E. Amezua,et al.  Obtaining configuration space and singularity maps for parallel manipulators , 2009 .

[8]  Raffaele Di Gregorio Determination of Singularities in Delta-Like Manipulators , 2004, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[9]  Med Amine Laribi,et al.  Analysis and dimensional synthesis of the DELTA robot for a prescribed workspace , 2007 .

[10]  Xin-Jun Liu,et al.  A New Approach to the Design of a DELTA Robot with a Desired Workspace , 2004, J. Intell. Robotic Syst..

[11]  Anjan Kumar Dash,et al.  Workspace analysis and singularity representation of three-legged parallel manipulators , 2002, 7th International Conference on Control, Automation, Robotics and Vision, 2002. ICARCV 2002..

[12]  C. Innocenti,et al.  Singularity-Free Evolution From One Configuration to Another in Serial and Fully-Parallel Manipulators , 1998 .

[13]  Jian Wang,et al.  Workspace evaluation of Stewart platforms , 1994, Adv. Robotics.

[14]  M. López,et al.  Delta robot: Inverse, direct, and intermediate Jacobians , 2006 .

[15]  Clément Gosselin,et al.  Singularity analysis of closed-loop kinematic chains , 1990, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[16]  C. Gosselin Determination of the Workspace of 6-DOF Parallel Manipulators , 1990 .

[17]  K. H. Hunt,et al.  Assembly configurations of some in-parallel-actuated manipulators , 1993 .

[18]  Charles Pinto,et al.  A practical procedure to analyze singular configurations in closed kinematic chains , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.