Do U.S. medical licensure examination step 1 scores correlate with council on resident education in obstetrics and gynecology in-training examination scores and American board of obstetrics and gynecology written examination performance?

OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to assess the possible association between scores of >200 on U.S. Medical Licensure Examination (USMLE) step 1 and the Council on Resident Education in Obstetrics and Gynecology (CREOG) in-training examinations and the pass rate on the American Board of Obstetrics and Gynecology (ABOG) written examination. METHODS The USMLE step 1 and postgraduate year 1 to 4 CREOG in-training examination scores for the graduating chief residents in eight accredited obstetrics and gynecology residency programs were obtained. Performance on USMLE step 1 was correlated with ABOG examination performance and CREOG in-training examination scores. The correlations between USMLE step 1 and CREOG in-training examination scores and ABOG examination performance were analyzed by using the Spearman correlation coefficient. RESULTS USMLE step 1 scores were significantly correlated with CREOG in-training examination scores (p < 0.000). None of the residents who scored >200 on USMLE step 1 and a mean of >200 on the CREOG in-training examinations failed the ABOG written examination. CONCLUSION Program directors have used USMLE step 1 to identify trainees who are likely to perform well on the CREOG in-training examination. The CREOG in-training examination has been used to identify residents who are likely to pass the ABOG written examination. The results of this study document the strength of these associations.

[1]  J. Bell,et al.  Selection of obstetrics and gynecology residents on the basis of medical school performance. , 2002, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[2]  M. Roberson,et al.  The dishonest dean's letter: an analysis of 532 dean's letters from 99 U.S. medical schools. , 1999, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[3]  W. Haffner,et al.  PREDICTORS OF PERFORMANCE ON THE NATIONAL BOARD OF MEDICAL EXAMINERS OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY SUBJECT EXAMINATION , 1998, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[4]  H. Mayhew,et al.  The process of resident selection: a view from the residency director's desk. , 1995, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[5]  C. Elam,et al.  Using preadmission and medical school performances to predict scores on the USMLE step 2 examination , 1994, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[6]  J. Woolliscroft,et al.  Effect of an ambulatory care rotation on third‐year students' diagnostic problem‐solving skills , 1994, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[7]  C. Maclaren,et al.  Characteristics of dean's letters in 1981 and 1992 , 1993, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[8]  O'Donnell Mj,et al.  Background essential to the proper use of results of step 1 and step 2 of the USMLE. , 1993 .

[9]  K. Hoffman The USMLE, the NBME subject examinations, and assessment of individual academic achievement , 1993, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[10]  Visscher Hc Validity and purpose of in-training examination in obstetrics and gynecology, 1979-1982. , 1984 .