A new ultrasound parameter for osteoporosis diagnosis: Clinical validation on normal- and under-weight women

Aim of this work was to evaluate the effectiveness of a recently introduced ultrasound (US) method for osteoporosis diagnosis, when extensively used in a clinical context to investigate adult women of variable age. A total of 384 female patients (46-65 years; body mass index <; 25 kg/m2) underwent a spinal dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and an abdominal US scan of lumbar spine, acquiring both echographic images and unprocessed radiofrequency signals. US data were analyzed through a new fully automatic algorithm, which performed a series of spectral and statistical analyses to calculate the parameter called Osteoporosis Score (O.S.). Diagnostic effectiveness of O.S. was assessed through a direct comparison with DXA measurements (assumed as the gold standard reference), quantifying the agreement between the two methods through accuracy calculation, Cohen's kappa (k) and Pearson correlation coefficient (r). The overall accuracy of O.S.-based diagnoses resulted 84.6%, ranging from a minimum of 81.7% for the oldest patients (aged in 61-65 y) to a maximum of 87.2% for the youngest patients (aged in 46-50 y). Cohen's kappa showed an analogous trend, confirming a significant agreement between DXA and US-based diagnoses along the whole considered age interval (k=0.758, p<;0.0001). A good correlation was also found between O.S.-derived BMD values and corresponding DXA measurements (r=0.72, p<;0.001). These results demonstrated that US-measured O.S. is significantly correlated with spinal BMD in normal- and under-weight adult women belonging to a wide age interval. Therefore, the routine clinical application of this innovative approach to osteoporosis diagnosis can be envisioned.

[1]  Piet P. Geusens,et al.  Osteoporosis, frailty and fracture: implications for case finding and therapy , 2012, Nature Reviews Rheumatology.

[2]  C. Cooper,et al.  Osteoporosis , 2006, The Lancet.

[3]  Jeffrey R. Curtis,et al.  Management of Osteoporosis among the Elderly with Other Chronic Medical Conditions , 2012, Drugs & Aging.

[4]  C. Cooper,et al.  Osteoporosis: trends in epidemiology, pathogenesis and treatment , 2006 .

[5]  Noriko Yoshimura,et al.  A Meta‐Analysis of the Association of Fracture Risk and Body Mass Index in Women , 2014, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[6]  Brian S Garra,et al.  Measurements of ultrasonic backscattered spectral centroid shift from spine in vivo: methodology and preliminary results. , 2009, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[7]  Johan Sundström,et al.  Prediction of fracture risk in men: A cohort study , 2011, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[8]  M. Bradburn,et al.  A European multicenter comparison of quantitative ultrasound measurement variables: The OPUS study , 2012, Osteoporosis International.

[9]  Thomas M Link,et al.  osteoporosis imaging : State of the Art and Advanced Imaging 1 , 2022 .

[10]  Paul Clopton,et al.  Intervertebral disk calcification of the spine in an elderly population: radiographic prevalence, location, and distribution and correlation with spinal degeneration. , 2004, Radiology.

[11]  E. Lewiecki,et al.  Bone Densitometry and Vertebral Fracture Assessment , 2010, Current osteoporosis reports.

[12]  Hari Sharma,et al.  Direct and Indirect Costs of Non-Vertebral Fracture Patients with Osteoporosis in the US , 2012, PharmacoEconomics.

[13]  K Engelke,et al.  Quality and performance measures in bone densitometry: part 1: errors and diagnosis. , 2006, Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA.

[14]  Jacob Cohen A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales , 1960 .

[15]  T. Schnitzer,et al.  Calcaneal Quantitative Ultrasound Compared With Hip and Femoral Neck Dual‐Energy X‐Ray Absorptiometry in People With A Spinal Cord Injury , 2012, PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation.

[16]  I. Bosaeus,et al.  High correlation between quantitative ultrasound and DXA during 7 years of follow-up. , 2010, European journal of radiology.

[17]  M Matsukawa,et al.  Trabecular and cortical bone separately assessed at radius with a new ultrasound device, in a young adult population with various physical activities. , 2010, Bone.

[18]  A. Wilson,et al.  A backscatter difference technique for ultrasonic bone assessment. , 2012, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[19]  Remus Campean,et al.  Accuracy of quantitative ultrasound parameters in the diagnosis of osteoporosis , 2010 .

[20]  J. P. Karjalainen,et al.  Multi-site bone ultrasound measurements in elderly women with and without previous hip fractures , 2012, Osteoporosis International.

[21]  X. Guo,et al.  Individual trabecula segmentation (ITS)–based morphological analysis of microscale images of human tibial trabecular bone at limited spatial resolution , 2011, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[22]  Pascal Laugier,et al.  Quantitative ultrasound of cortical bone in the femoral neck predicts femur strength: Results of a pilot study , 2013, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[23]  Anna Lipowicz,et al.  BMI, hypertension and low bone mineral density in adult men and women. , 2012, Homo : internationale Zeitschrift fur die vergleichende Forschung am Menschen.

[24]  S. Baim,et al.  Assessment of fracture risk. , 2011, Rheumatic diseases clinics of North America.

[25]  Pascal Laugier,et al.  A novel ultrasound methodology for estimating spine mineral density. , 2015, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[26]  Ingram Olkin,et al.  Meta-Analysis: Accuracy of Quantitative Ultrasound for Identifying Patients with Osteoporosis , 2006, Annals of Internal Medicine.