Design and Validation of MAPS for Educators: A Performance Support System to Guide Media Selection for Lesson Design

The importance of adopting technology-supported performance systems for on-the-job learning and training is well-recognized in a networked economy. In this study, we present a performance support system (PSS) designed to support technology integration for lesson design. The goal is to support educators in the development of appropriate and effective technology integration strategies for learning and training events. The system is based on the PSS design architecture created by Hung and Chao (2007) called Matrix-Aided Performance System (MAPS). MAPS was created to minimize navigational confusion and enhance users' comprehension and synthesis of information gathered from the PSS. Fifteen educators and instructional technologists were invited to evaluate the system's readiness as well as to identify potential practical constraints that might hinder its use in a real-world setting. Findings from a perception survey and focus group interviews confirm the beneficial effects of the unified interface on navigation and orientation of content materials. Feedback provided by participants to improve the system interaction and functionality are also reported to further validate the design architecture of MAPS.

[1]  Philip Barker,et al.  Building electronic performance support systems for first‐year university students , 2007 .

[2]  Pamela T. Northrup,et al.  STEPS: An EPSS Tool for Instructional Planning. , 1998 .

[3]  Gloria Gery The Future of EPSS. , 1995 .

[4]  Chi-Cheng Chang,et al.  The relationship between the performance and the perceived benefits of using an electronic performance support system (EPSS) , 2004 .

[5]  James Lockard,et al.  Using an Advance Organizer Guided Behavior Matrix to Support Teachers' Problem Solving in Classroom Behavior Management , 2007 .

[6]  Jakob Nielsen,et al.  Chapter 4 – The Usability Engineering Lifecycle , 1993 .

[7]  Douglas F. Kauffman,et al.  What makes a matrix so effective? An empirical test of the relative benefits of signaling, extraction, and localization , 2010 .

[8]  J. R. Turner New Metacognitive Model for Human Performance Technology. , 2011 .

[9]  James D. Klein,et al.  The effect of performance support and training as performance interventions , 2008 .

[10]  Wei‐Chen Hung,et al.  Integrating advance organizers and multidimensional information display in electronic performance support systems , 2007 .

[11]  Ching-Hsiang Liu,et al.  The Role of Electronic Performance Systems in Improving Learning and Performance: A Managerial Perspective , 2006 .

[12]  Elizabeth K. Wilson,et al.  From Preservice to Inservice Teaching , 2005 .

[13]  Rafi Nachmias,et al.  Online Learning and Performance Support in Organizational Environments Using Performance Support Platforms. , 2011 .

[14]  Min Kyu Kim Technology-Enhanced Learning Environments to Solve Performance Problems: A Case of a Korean Company , 2011 .

[15]  George R. Maughan Electronic Performance Support Systems and Technological Literacy. , 2005 .

[16]  Hasan Altalib ROI calculations for electronic performance support systems , 2002 .